Cargando…

Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline Versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection

BACKGROUND: Observational data suggest ceftaroline may be effective for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI), but comparative data with standard of care are limited. This analysis compares the outcomes of MRSA BSI treated with ceftaroline or daptomycin. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zasowski, Evan J, Trinh, Trang D, Claeys, Kimberly C, Lagnf, Abdalhamid M, Bhatia, Sahil, Klinker, Kenneth P, Veve, Michael P, Estrada, Sandy J, Johns, Scott T, Sawyer, Adam J, Huang, Vanthida, LaFrance, Brandi, Levine, Donald P, Kaye, Keith S, Davis, Susan L, Rybak, Michael J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab606
_version_ 1784647285994422272
author Zasowski, Evan J
Trinh, Trang D
Claeys, Kimberly C
Lagnf, Abdalhamid M
Bhatia, Sahil
Klinker, Kenneth P
Veve, Michael P
Estrada, Sandy J
Johns, Scott T
Sawyer, Adam J
Huang, Vanthida
LaFrance, Brandi
Levine, Donald P
Kaye, Keith S
Davis, Susan L
Rybak, Michael J
author_facet Zasowski, Evan J
Trinh, Trang D
Claeys, Kimberly C
Lagnf, Abdalhamid M
Bhatia, Sahil
Klinker, Kenneth P
Veve, Michael P
Estrada, Sandy J
Johns, Scott T
Sawyer, Adam J
Huang, Vanthida
LaFrance, Brandi
Levine, Donald P
Kaye, Keith S
Davis, Susan L
Rybak, Michael J
author_sort Zasowski, Evan J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Observational data suggest ceftaroline may be effective for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI), but comparative data with standard of care are limited. This analysis compares the outcomes of MRSA BSI treated with ceftaroline or daptomycin. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients with MRSA BSI from 2010 to 2017. Patients treated with ≥72 hours of ceftaroline or daptomycin were included. Those clearing BSI before study drug and those with a pneumonia source were excluded. The primary outcome was composite treatment failure, defined as 30-day mortality, BSI duration ≥7 days on study drug, and 60-day MRSA BSI recurrence. Inverse probability of treatment weighted risk difference in composite failure between daptomycin and ceftaroline groups was computed and 15% noninferiority margin applied. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy patients were included; 83 ceftaroline and 187 daptomycin. Ceftaroline was noninferior to daptomycin with respect to composite failure (39% daptomycin, 32.5% ceftaroline; weighted risk difference, 7.0% [95% confidence interval, –5.0% to 19.0%]). No differences between treatment groups was observed for 30-day mortality or other secondary efficacy outcomes. Creatine phosphokinase elevation was significantly more common among daptomycin patients (5.3% vs 0%, P = .034). Rash was significantly more common among ceftaroline patients (10.8 vs 1.1%, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in treatment failure or mortality was observed between MRSA BSI treated with ceftaroline or daptomycin. These data support future study of ceftaroline as a primary MRSA BSI treatment and current use of ceftaroline when an alternative to vancomycin and daptomycin is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8825758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88257582022-02-09 Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline Versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection Zasowski, Evan J Trinh, Trang D Claeys, Kimberly C Lagnf, Abdalhamid M Bhatia, Sahil Klinker, Kenneth P Veve, Michael P Estrada, Sandy J Johns, Scott T Sawyer, Adam J Huang, Vanthida LaFrance, Brandi Levine, Donald P Kaye, Keith S Davis, Susan L Rybak, Michael J Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Observational data suggest ceftaroline may be effective for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI), but comparative data with standard of care are limited. This analysis compares the outcomes of MRSA BSI treated with ceftaroline or daptomycin. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients with MRSA BSI from 2010 to 2017. Patients treated with ≥72 hours of ceftaroline or daptomycin were included. Those clearing BSI before study drug and those with a pneumonia source were excluded. The primary outcome was composite treatment failure, defined as 30-day mortality, BSI duration ≥7 days on study drug, and 60-day MRSA BSI recurrence. Inverse probability of treatment weighted risk difference in composite failure between daptomycin and ceftaroline groups was computed and 15% noninferiority margin applied. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy patients were included; 83 ceftaroline and 187 daptomycin. Ceftaroline was noninferior to daptomycin with respect to composite failure (39% daptomycin, 32.5% ceftaroline; weighted risk difference, 7.0% [95% confidence interval, –5.0% to 19.0%]). No differences between treatment groups was observed for 30-day mortality or other secondary efficacy outcomes. Creatine phosphokinase elevation was significantly more common among daptomycin patients (5.3% vs 0%, P = .034). Rash was significantly more common among ceftaroline patients (10.8 vs 1.1%, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: No difference in treatment failure or mortality was observed between MRSA BSI treated with ceftaroline or daptomycin. These data support future study of ceftaroline as a primary MRSA BSI treatment and current use of ceftaroline when an alternative to vancomycin and daptomycin is required. Oxford University Press 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8825758/ /pubmed/35146040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab606 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Zasowski, Evan J
Trinh, Trang D
Claeys, Kimberly C
Lagnf, Abdalhamid M
Bhatia, Sahil
Klinker, Kenneth P
Veve, Michael P
Estrada, Sandy J
Johns, Scott T
Sawyer, Adam J
Huang, Vanthida
LaFrance, Brandi
Levine, Donald P
Kaye, Keith S
Davis, Susan L
Rybak, Michael J
Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline Versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection
title Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline Versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection
title_full Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline Versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection
title_fullStr Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline Versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection
title_full_unstemmed Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline Versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection
title_short Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline Versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection
title_sort multicenter cohort study of ceftaroline versus daptomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab606
work_keys_str_mv AT zasowskievanj multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT trinhtrangd multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT claeyskimberlyc multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT lagnfabdalhamidm multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT bhatiasahil multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT klinkerkennethp multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT vevemichaelp multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT estradasandyj multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT johnsscottt multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT sawyeradamj multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT huangvanthida multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT lafrancebrandi multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT levinedonaldp multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT kayekeiths multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT davissusanl multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection
AT rybakmichaelj multicentercohortstudyofceftarolineversusdaptomycinfortreatmentofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbloodstreaminfection