Cargando…

A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle

Dehorning is a common practice in the dairy industry, but raises animal welfare concerns. A naturally occurring genetic mutation (P(C) allele) comprised of a 212 bp duplicated DNA sequence replacing a 10-bp sequence at the polled locus is associated with the hornless phenotype (polled) in cattle. To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hennig, Sadie L., Owen, Joseph R., Lin, Jason C., McNabb, Bret R., Van Eenennaam, Alison L., Murray, James D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35136148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06118-6
_version_ 1784647322661027840
author Hennig, Sadie L.
Owen, Joseph R.
Lin, Jason C.
McNabb, Bret R.
Van Eenennaam, Alison L.
Murray, James D.
author_facet Hennig, Sadie L.
Owen, Joseph R.
Lin, Jason C.
McNabb, Bret R.
Van Eenennaam, Alison L.
Murray, James D.
author_sort Hennig, Sadie L.
collection PubMed
description Dehorning is a common practice in the dairy industry, but raises animal welfare concerns. A naturally occurring genetic mutation (P(C) allele) comprised of a 212 bp duplicated DNA sequence replacing a 10-bp sequence at the polled locus is associated with the hornless phenotype (polled) in cattle. To test the hypothesis that the 10 bp deletion alone is sufficient to result in polled, a CRISPR-Cas9 dual guide RNA approach was optimized to delete a 133 bp region including the 10 bp sequence. Timing of ribonucleoprotein complex injections at various hours post insemination (hpi) (6, 8, and 18 hpi) as well as in vitro transcribed (IVT) vs synthetic gRNAs were compared. Embryos injected 6 hpi had a significantly higher deletion rate (53%) compared to those injected 8 (12%) and 18 hpi (7%), and synthetic gRNAs had a significantly higher deletion rate (84%) compared to IVT gRNAs (53%). Embryo transfers were performed, and bovine fetuses were harvested between 3 and 5 months of gestation. All fetuses had mutations at the target site, with two of the seven having biallelic deletions, and yet they displayed horn bud development indicating that the 10 bp deletion alone is not sufficient to result in the polled phenotype.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8825853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88258532022-02-09 A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle Hennig, Sadie L. Owen, Joseph R. Lin, Jason C. McNabb, Bret R. Van Eenennaam, Alison L. Murray, James D. Sci Rep Article Dehorning is a common practice in the dairy industry, but raises animal welfare concerns. A naturally occurring genetic mutation (P(C) allele) comprised of a 212 bp duplicated DNA sequence replacing a 10-bp sequence at the polled locus is associated with the hornless phenotype (polled) in cattle. To test the hypothesis that the 10 bp deletion alone is sufficient to result in polled, a CRISPR-Cas9 dual guide RNA approach was optimized to delete a 133 bp region including the 10 bp sequence. Timing of ribonucleoprotein complex injections at various hours post insemination (hpi) (6, 8, and 18 hpi) as well as in vitro transcribed (IVT) vs synthetic gRNAs were compared. Embryos injected 6 hpi had a significantly higher deletion rate (53%) compared to those injected 8 (12%) and 18 hpi (7%), and synthetic gRNAs had a significantly higher deletion rate (84%) compared to IVT gRNAs (53%). Embryo transfers were performed, and bovine fetuses were harvested between 3 and 5 months of gestation. All fetuses had mutations at the target site, with two of the seven having biallelic deletions, and yet they displayed horn bud development indicating that the 10 bp deletion alone is not sufficient to result in the polled phenotype. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8825853/ /pubmed/35136148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06118-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hennig, Sadie L.
Owen, Joseph R.
Lin, Jason C.
McNabb, Bret R.
Van Eenennaam, Alison L.
Murray, James D.
A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle
title A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle
title_full A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle
title_fullStr A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle
title_full_unstemmed A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle
title_short A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle
title_sort deletion at the polled p(c) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35136148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06118-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hennigsadiel adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT owenjosephr adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT linjasonc adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT mcnabbbretr adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT vaneenennaamalisonl adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT murrayjamesd adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT hennigsadiel deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT owenjosephr deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT linjasonc deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT mcnabbbretr deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT vaneenennaamalisonl deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle
AT murrayjamesd deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle