Cargando…
A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle
Dehorning is a common practice in the dairy industry, but raises animal welfare concerns. A naturally occurring genetic mutation (P(C) allele) comprised of a 212 bp duplicated DNA sequence replacing a 10-bp sequence at the polled locus is associated with the hornless phenotype (polled) in cattle. To...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35136148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06118-6 |
_version_ | 1784647322661027840 |
---|---|
author | Hennig, Sadie L. Owen, Joseph R. Lin, Jason C. McNabb, Bret R. Van Eenennaam, Alison L. Murray, James D. |
author_facet | Hennig, Sadie L. Owen, Joseph R. Lin, Jason C. McNabb, Bret R. Van Eenennaam, Alison L. Murray, James D. |
author_sort | Hennig, Sadie L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dehorning is a common practice in the dairy industry, but raises animal welfare concerns. A naturally occurring genetic mutation (P(C) allele) comprised of a 212 bp duplicated DNA sequence replacing a 10-bp sequence at the polled locus is associated with the hornless phenotype (polled) in cattle. To test the hypothesis that the 10 bp deletion alone is sufficient to result in polled, a CRISPR-Cas9 dual guide RNA approach was optimized to delete a 133 bp region including the 10 bp sequence. Timing of ribonucleoprotein complex injections at various hours post insemination (hpi) (6, 8, and 18 hpi) as well as in vitro transcribed (IVT) vs synthetic gRNAs were compared. Embryos injected 6 hpi had a significantly higher deletion rate (53%) compared to those injected 8 (12%) and 18 hpi (7%), and synthetic gRNAs had a significantly higher deletion rate (84%) compared to IVT gRNAs (53%). Embryo transfers were performed, and bovine fetuses were harvested between 3 and 5 months of gestation. All fetuses had mutations at the target site, with two of the seven having biallelic deletions, and yet they displayed horn bud development indicating that the 10 bp deletion alone is not sufficient to result in the polled phenotype. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8825853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88258532022-02-09 A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle Hennig, Sadie L. Owen, Joseph R. Lin, Jason C. McNabb, Bret R. Van Eenennaam, Alison L. Murray, James D. Sci Rep Article Dehorning is a common practice in the dairy industry, but raises animal welfare concerns. A naturally occurring genetic mutation (P(C) allele) comprised of a 212 bp duplicated DNA sequence replacing a 10-bp sequence at the polled locus is associated with the hornless phenotype (polled) in cattle. To test the hypothesis that the 10 bp deletion alone is sufficient to result in polled, a CRISPR-Cas9 dual guide RNA approach was optimized to delete a 133 bp region including the 10 bp sequence. Timing of ribonucleoprotein complex injections at various hours post insemination (hpi) (6, 8, and 18 hpi) as well as in vitro transcribed (IVT) vs synthetic gRNAs were compared. Embryos injected 6 hpi had a significantly higher deletion rate (53%) compared to those injected 8 (12%) and 18 hpi (7%), and synthetic gRNAs had a significantly higher deletion rate (84%) compared to IVT gRNAs (53%). Embryo transfers were performed, and bovine fetuses were harvested between 3 and 5 months of gestation. All fetuses had mutations at the target site, with two of the seven having biallelic deletions, and yet they displayed horn bud development indicating that the 10 bp deletion alone is not sufficient to result in the polled phenotype. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8825853/ /pubmed/35136148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06118-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hennig, Sadie L. Owen, Joseph R. Lin, Jason C. McNabb, Bret R. Van Eenennaam, Alison L. Murray, James D. A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle |
title | A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle |
title_full | A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle |
title_fullStr | A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle |
title_short | A deletion at the polled P(C) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle |
title_sort | deletion at the polled p(c) locus alone is not sufficient to cause a polled phenotype in cattle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35136148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06118-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hennigsadiel adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT owenjosephr adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT linjasonc adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT mcnabbbretr adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT vaneenennaamalisonl adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT murrayjamesd adeletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT hennigsadiel deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT owenjosephr deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT linjasonc deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT mcnabbbretr deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT vaneenennaamalisonl deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle AT murrayjamesd deletionatthepolledpclocusaloneisnotsufficienttocauseapolledphenotypeincattle |