Cargando…

Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird

1. The availability and investment of energy among successive life‐history stages is a key feature of carryover effects. In migratory organisms, examining how both winter and spring experiences carryover to affect breeding activity is difficult due to the challenges in tracking individuals through t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steenweg, Rolanda J., Crossin, Glenn T., Hennin, Holly L., Gilchrist, H. Grant, Love, Oliver P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8588
_version_ 1784647354330120192
author Steenweg, Rolanda J.
Crossin, Glenn T.
Hennin, Holly L.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Love, Oliver P.
author_facet Steenweg, Rolanda J.
Crossin, Glenn T.
Hennin, Holly L.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Love, Oliver P.
author_sort Steenweg, Rolanda J.
collection PubMed
description 1. The availability and investment of energy among successive life‐history stages is a key feature of carryover effects. In migratory organisms, examining how both winter and spring experiences carryover to affect breeding activity is difficult due to the challenges in tracking individuals through these periods without impacting their behavior, thereby biasing results. 2. Using common eiders Somateria mollissima, we examined whether spring conditions at an Arctic breeding colony (East Bay Island, Nunavut, Canada) can buffer the impacts of winter temperatures on body mass and breeding decisions in birds that winter at different locations (Nuuk and Disko Bay, Greenland, and Newfoundland, Canada; assessed by analyzing stable isotopes of 13‐carbon in winter‐grown claw samples). Specifically, we used path analysis to examine how wintering and spring environmental conditions interact to affect breeding propensity (a key reproductive decision influencing lifetime fitness in female eiders) within the contexts of the timing of colony arrival, pre‐breeding body mass (body condition), and a physiological proxy for foraging effort (baseline corticosterone). 3. We demonstrate that warmer winter temperatures predicted lower body mass at arrival to the nesting colony, whereas warmer spring temperatures predicted earlier arrival dates and higher arrival body mass. Both higher body mass and earlier arrival dates of eider hens increased the probability that birds would initiate laying (i.e., higher breeding propensity). However, variation in baseline corticosterone was not linked to either winter or spring temperatures, and it had no additional downstream effects on breeding propensity. 4. Overall, we demonstrate that favorable pre‐breeding conditions in Arctic‐breeding common eiders can compensate for the impact that unfavorable wintering conditions can have on breeding investment, perhaps due to greater access to foraging areas prior to laying.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8826066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88260662022-02-11 Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird Steenweg, Rolanda J. Crossin, Glenn T. Hennin, Holly L. Gilchrist, H. Grant Love, Oliver P. Ecol Evol Research Articles 1. The availability and investment of energy among successive life‐history stages is a key feature of carryover effects. In migratory organisms, examining how both winter and spring experiences carryover to affect breeding activity is difficult due to the challenges in tracking individuals through these periods without impacting their behavior, thereby biasing results. 2. Using common eiders Somateria mollissima, we examined whether spring conditions at an Arctic breeding colony (East Bay Island, Nunavut, Canada) can buffer the impacts of winter temperatures on body mass and breeding decisions in birds that winter at different locations (Nuuk and Disko Bay, Greenland, and Newfoundland, Canada; assessed by analyzing stable isotopes of 13‐carbon in winter‐grown claw samples). Specifically, we used path analysis to examine how wintering and spring environmental conditions interact to affect breeding propensity (a key reproductive decision influencing lifetime fitness in female eiders) within the contexts of the timing of colony arrival, pre‐breeding body mass (body condition), and a physiological proxy for foraging effort (baseline corticosterone). 3. We demonstrate that warmer winter temperatures predicted lower body mass at arrival to the nesting colony, whereas warmer spring temperatures predicted earlier arrival dates and higher arrival body mass. Both higher body mass and earlier arrival dates of eider hens increased the probability that birds would initiate laying (i.e., higher breeding propensity). However, variation in baseline corticosterone was not linked to either winter or spring temperatures, and it had no additional downstream effects on breeding propensity. 4. Overall, we demonstrate that favorable pre‐breeding conditions in Arctic‐breeding common eiders can compensate for the impact that unfavorable wintering conditions can have on breeding investment, perhaps due to greater access to foraging areas prior to laying. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8826066/ /pubmed/35154656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8588 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Steenweg, Rolanda J.
Crossin, Glenn T.
Hennin, Holly L.
Gilchrist, H. Grant
Love, Oliver P.
Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title_full Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title_fullStr Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title_full_unstemmed Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title_short Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic‐breeding seabird
title_sort favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an arctic‐breeding seabird
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8588
work_keys_str_mv AT steenwegrolandaj favorablespringconditionscanbuffertheimpactofwintercarryovereffectsonakeybreedingdecisioninanarcticbreedingseabird
AT crossinglennt favorablespringconditionscanbuffertheimpactofwintercarryovereffectsonakeybreedingdecisioninanarcticbreedingseabird
AT henninhollyl favorablespringconditionscanbuffertheimpactofwintercarryovereffectsonakeybreedingdecisioninanarcticbreedingseabird
AT gilchristhgrant favorablespringconditionscanbuffertheimpactofwintercarryovereffectsonakeybreedingdecisioninanarcticbreedingseabird
AT loveoliverp favorablespringconditionscanbuffertheimpactofwintercarryovereffectsonakeybreedingdecisioninanarcticbreedingseabird