Cargando…

Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement

OBJECTIVE: Facial anthropometric data is important for the design of respirators. Two-dimensional (2D) photogrammetry has replaced direct anthropometric method, but the reliability and accuracy of 2D photogrammetry has not been quantified. This study aimed to assess inter-rater reliability of 2D pho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Yin Cheng, Abdul Shakor, Ameerah Su'ad, Shaharudin, Rafiza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155360
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.813058
_version_ 1784647355384987648
author Lim, Yin Cheng
Abdul Shakor, Ameerah Su'ad
Shaharudin, Rafiza
author_facet Lim, Yin Cheng
Abdul Shakor, Ameerah Su'ad
Shaharudin, Rafiza
author_sort Lim, Yin Cheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Facial anthropometric data is important for the design of respirators. Two-dimensional (2D) photogrammetry has replaced direct anthropometric method, but the reliability and accuracy of 2D photogrammetry has not been quantified. This study aimed to assess inter-rater reliability of 2D photogrammetry and to examine the reliability and accuracy of 2D photogrammetry with direct measurement. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Malaysia. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of 96 participants aged 18 and above. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Ten facial dimensions were measured using direct measurement and 2D photogrammetry. An assessment of inter-rater reliability was performed using intra-class correlation (ICC) of the 2D images. In addition, ICC and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess the reliability and agreement of 2D photogrammetry with direct measurement. RESULTS: Except for head breadth and bigonial breadth, which were also found to have low inter-rater reliability, there was no significant difference in the inter-rater mean value of the 2D photogrammetry. The mean measurements derived from direct measurement and 2D photogrammetry were mostly similar. However, statistical differences were noted for two facial dimensions, i.e., bizygomatic breadth and bigonial breadth, and clinically the magnitude of difference was also significant. There were no statistical differences in respect to the remaining eight facial dimensions, where the smallest mean difference was 0.3 mm and biggest mean difference was 1.0 mm. The ICC showed head breadth had poor reliability, whilst Bland-Altman analyses showed seven out of 10 facial dimensions using 2D photogrammetry were accurate, as compared to direct measurement. CONCLUSION: Only certain facial measurements can be reliably and accurately measured using 2D photogrammetry, thus it is important to conduct a reliability and validation study before the use of any measurement methods in anthropometric studies. The results of this study also suggest that 2D photogrammetry can be used to supplement direct measurement for certain facial dimensions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8826070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88260702022-02-10 Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement Lim, Yin Cheng Abdul Shakor, Ameerah Su'ad Shaharudin, Rafiza Front Public Health Public Health OBJECTIVE: Facial anthropometric data is important for the design of respirators. Two-dimensional (2D) photogrammetry has replaced direct anthropometric method, but the reliability and accuracy of 2D photogrammetry has not been quantified. This study aimed to assess inter-rater reliability of 2D photogrammetry and to examine the reliability and accuracy of 2D photogrammetry with direct measurement. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Malaysia. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of 96 participants aged 18 and above. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Ten facial dimensions were measured using direct measurement and 2D photogrammetry. An assessment of inter-rater reliability was performed using intra-class correlation (ICC) of the 2D images. In addition, ICC and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess the reliability and agreement of 2D photogrammetry with direct measurement. RESULTS: Except for head breadth and bigonial breadth, which were also found to have low inter-rater reliability, there was no significant difference in the inter-rater mean value of the 2D photogrammetry. The mean measurements derived from direct measurement and 2D photogrammetry were mostly similar. However, statistical differences were noted for two facial dimensions, i.e., bizygomatic breadth and bigonial breadth, and clinically the magnitude of difference was also significant. There were no statistical differences in respect to the remaining eight facial dimensions, where the smallest mean difference was 0.3 mm and biggest mean difference was 1.0 mm. The ICC showed head breadth had poor reliability, whilst Bland-Altman analyses showed seven out of 10 facial dimensions using 2D photogrammetry were accurate, as compared to direct measurement. CONCLUSION: Only certain facial measurements can be reliably and accurately measured using 2D photogrammetry, thus it is important to conduct a reliability and validation study before the use of any measurement methods in anthropometric studies. The results of this study also suggest that 2D photogrammetry can be used to supplement direct measurement for certain facial dimensions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8826070/ /pubmed/35155360 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.813058 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lim, Abdul Shakor and Shaharudin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Lim, Yin Cheng
Abdul Shakor, Ameerah Su'ad
Shaharudin, Rafiza
Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement
title Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement
title_full Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement
title_fullStr Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement
title_short Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement
title_sort reliability and accuracy of 2d photogrammetry: a comparison with direct measurement
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155360
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.813058
work_keys_str_mv AT limyincheng reliabilityandaccuracyof2dphotogrammetryacomparisonwithdirectmeasurement
AT abdulshakorameerahsuad reliabilityandaccuracyof2dphotogrammetryacomparisonwithdirectmeasurement
AT shaharudinrafiza reliabilityandaccuracyof2dphotogrammetryacomparisonwithdirectmeasurement