Cargando…

Identifying the Candidates Who Will Benefit From Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients With Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE: The therapeutic effect of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is still controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the PCa patients who may benefit from extended PLND based on the 2012 Briganti nomogram. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PCa patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Guanjie, Xie, Jun, Guo, Yadong, Yuan, Jing, Wang, Ruiliang, Guo, Changcheng, Peng, Bo, Yao, Xudong, Yang, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.790183
_version_ 1784647355613577216
author Yang, Guanjie
Xie, Jun
Guo, Yadong
Yuan, Jing
Wang, Ruiliang
Guo, Changcheng
Peng, Bo
Yao, Xudong
Yang, Bin
author_facet Yang, Guanjie
Xie, Jun
Guo, Yadong
Yuan, Jing
Wang, Ruiliang
Guo, Changcheng
Peng, Bo
Yao, Xudong
Yang, Bin
author_sort Yang, Guanjie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The therapeutic effect of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is still controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the PCa patients who may benefit from extended PLND based on the 2012 Briganti nomogram. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) plus PLND between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The probability of lymph node invasion (LNI), determined using the 2012 Briganti nomogram, was used to stratify the patients. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for potential differences between patients with and without extended PLND. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze the association between the number of removed nodes (NRN) and survival. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to estimate OS and CSS. Extended PLND was defined as NRN >75th percentile. RESULTS: A total of 27,690 patients were included in the study. NRN was not an independent predictor of OS (p = 0.564). However, in patients with probability of LNI ≥37, multivariable analyses showed that increased NRN was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.963; p = 0.002). The 5-y OS rate was significantly higher for patients with NRN ≥12 than those with NRN <12 (94.9% vs. 91.9%, respectively; p = 0.015). In the PSM cohort, among patients with probability of LNI ≥37, multivariable analyses showed that increased NRN was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.961; p = 0.004). In addition, the 5-y OS rate was significantly higher for patients with NRN ≥12 than those with NRN <12 (94.9% vs. 89.8%, respectively; p = 0.002). However, NRN was not an independent predictor of CSS in any LNI risk subgroup (all p >0.05). CONCLUSION: Extensive PLND might be associated with improved survival in PCa patients with a high risk of LNI, which supports the use of extended PLND in highly selected PCa patients. The results need to be validated in prospective studies with long-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8826072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88260722022-02-10 Identifying the Candidates Who Will Benefit From Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients With Prostate Cancer Yang, Guanjie Xie, Jun Guo, Yadong Yuan, Jing Wang, Ruiliang Guo, Changcheng Peng, Bo Yao, Xudong Yang, Bin Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: The therapeutic effect of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients is still controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the PCa patients who may benefit from extended PLND based on the 2012 Briganti nomogram. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) plus PLND between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The probability of lymph node invasion (LNI), determined using the 2012 Briganti nomogram, was used to stratify the patients. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for potential differences between patients with and without extended PLND. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze the association between the number of removed nodes (NRN) and survival. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to estimate OS and CSS. Extended PLND was defined as NRN >75th percentile. RESULTS: A total of 27,690 patients were included in the study. NRN was not an independent predictor of OS (p = 0.564). However, in patients with probability of LNI ≥37, multivariable analyses showed that increased NRN was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.963; p = 0.002). The 5-y OS rate was significantly higher for patients with NRN ≥12 than those with NRN <12 (94.9% vs. 91.9%, respectively; p = 0.015). In the PSM cohort, among patients with probability of LNI ≥37, multivariable analyses showed that increased NRN was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.961; p = 0.004). In addition, the 5-y OS rate was significantly higher for patients with NRN ≥12 than those with NRN <12 (94.9% vs. 89.8%, respectively; p = 0.002). However, NRN was not an independent predictor of CSS in any LNI risk subgroup (all p >0.05). CONCLUSION: Extensive PLND might be associated with improved survival in PCa patients with a high risk of LNI, which supports the use of extended PLND in highly selected PCa patients. The results need to be validated in prospective studies with long-term follow-up. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8826072/ /pubmed/35155191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.790183 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yang, Xie, Guo, Yuan, Wang, Guo, Peng, Yao and Yang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Yang, Guanjie
Xie, Jun
Guo, Yadong
Yuan, Jing
Wang, Ruiliang
Guo, Changcheng
Peng, Bo
Yao, Xudong
Yang, Bin
Identifying the Candidates Who Will Benefit From Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients With Prostate Cancer
title Identifying the Candidates Who Will Benefit From Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients With Prostate Cancer
title_full Identifying the Candidates Who Will Benefit From Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients With Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Identifying the Candidates Who Will Benefit From Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients With Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Identifying the Candidates Who Will Benefit From Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients With Prostate Cancer
title_short Identifying the Candidates Who Will Benefit From Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients With Prostate Cancer
title_sort identifying the candidates who will benefit from extended pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy among patients with prostate cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.790183
work_keys_str_mv AT yangguanjie identifyingthecandidateswhowillbenefitfromextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyamongpatientswithprostatecancer
AT xiejun identifyingthecandidateswhowillbenefitfromextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyamongpatientswithprostatecancer
AT guoyadong identifyingthecandidateswhowillbenefitfromextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyamongpatientswithprostatecancer
AT yuanjing identifyingthecandidateswhowillbenefitfromextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyamongpatientswithprostatecancer
AT wangruiliang identifyingthecandidateswhowillbenefitfromextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyamongpatientswithprostatecancer
AT guochangcheng identifyingthecandidateswhowillbenefitfromextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyamongpatientswithprostatecancer
AT pengbo identifyingthecandidateswhowillbenefitfromextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyamongpatientswithprostatecancer
AT yaoxudong identifyingthecandidateswhowillbenefitfromextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyamongpatientswithprostatecancer
AT yangbin identifyingthecandidateswhowillbenefitfromextendedpelviclymphnodedissectionatradicalprostatectomyamongpatientswithprostatecancer