Cargando…

Validity and reliability of sleep promotion questionnaire and predictors of quality of care

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is common among hospitalized patients. However, sleep promotion is not a high priority for most healthcare providers, which potentially impacts quality of care. Due to a paucity of validated tools to assess sleep promotion, little is known about the relationship between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Son Chae, Pedersen, Chase, Yi, Cassia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312118794595
_version_ 1784647361199341568
author Kim, Son Chae
Pedersen, Chase
Yi, Cassia
author_facet Kim, Son Chae
Pedersen, Chase
Yi, Cassia
author_sort Kim, Son Chae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is common among hospitalized patients. However, sleep promotion is not a high priority for most healthcare providers, which potentially impacts quality of care. Due to a paucity of validated tools to assess sleep promotion, little is known about the relationship between sleep promotion and quality of care. This study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of a newly-developed instrument, the Sleep Promotion Questionnaire, and to examine sleep promotion as a predictor of quality of care. The Sleep Promotion Questionnaire includes dimensions of attitude, control, unit norms, intention, and behavior that are associated with sleep promotion. METHODS: A total of 302 nurses participated in an online survey. The survey included the initial 36-item Sleep Promotion Questionnaire, a quality of care question, Caring Behavior Inventory, and Professional Quality of Life scale. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to determine the factor structure of the Sleep Promotion Questionnaire. The internal consistency reliability as well as the convergent and divergent validities was assessed. Pearson’s correlations and hierarchical multiple regression procedures were performed to explore the predictors of perceived quality of care. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis of the Sleep Promotion Questionnaire yielded 28 items in five subscales, comprising Attitude, Control, Unit Norms, Sleep-aid Intention, and Behavior. Convergent and divergent validities were supported (r = 0.37; r = −0.38, respectively). The Cronbach’s alphas of internal consistency reliabilities of the Sleep Promotion Questionnaire subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.89. Regression models showed that sleep-promoting Unit Norms was the only significant predictor of perceived quality of care among both ICU and non-ICU nurses (β = 0.40; β = 0.28, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Sleep Promotion Questionnaire appears to be a reliable and valid instrument with satisfactory psychometric properties for assessing sleep promotion, and it seems that having unit norms conducive to sleep promotion may positively impact the quality of care. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8826097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88260972022-02-10 Validity and reliability of sleep promotion questionnaire and predictors of quality of care Kim, Son Chae Pedersen, Chase Yi, Cassia SAGE Open Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is common among hospitalized patients. However, sleep promotion is not a high priority for most healthcare providers, which potentially impacts quality of care. Due to a paucity of validated tools to assess sleep promotion, little is known about the relationship between sleep promotion and quality of care. This study was conducted to assess the validity and reliability of a newly-developed instrument, the Sleep Promotion Questionnaire, and to examine sleep promotion as a predictor of quality of care. The Sleep Promotion Questionnaire includes dimensions of attitude, control, unit norms, intention, and behavior that are associated with sleep promotion. METHODS: A total of 302 nurses participated in an online survey. The survey included the initial 36-item Sleep Promotion Questionnaire, a quality of care question, Caring Behavior Inventory, and Professional Quality of Life scale. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to determine the factor structure of the Sleep Promotion Questionnaire. The internal consistency reliability as well as the convergent and divergent validities was assessed. Pearson’s correlations and hierarchical multiple regression procedures were performed to explore the predictors of perceived quality of care. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis of the Sleep Promotion Questionnaire yielded 28 items in five subscales, comprising Attitude, Control, Unit Norms, Sleep-aid Intention, and Behavior. Convergent and divergent validities were supported (r = 0.37; r = −0.38, respectively). The Cronbach’s alphas of internal consistency reliabilities of the Sleep Promotion Questionnaire subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.89. Regression models showed that sleep-promoting Unit Norms was the only significant predictor of perceived quality of care among both ICU and non-ICU nurses (β = 0.40; β = 0.28, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Sleep Promotion Questionnaire appears to be a reliable and valid instrument with satisfactory psychometric properties for assessing sleep promotion, and it seems that having unit norms conducive to sleep promotion may positively impact the quality of care. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results. SAGE Publications 2018-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8826097/ /pubmed/35154749 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312118794595 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Son Chae
Pedersen, Chase
Yi, Cassia
Validity and reliability of sleep promotion questionnaire and predictors of quality of care
title Validity and reliability of sleep promotion questionnaire and predictors of quality of care
title_full Validity and reliability of sleep promotion questionnaire and predictors of quality of care
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of sleep promotion questionnaire and predictors of quality of care
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of sleep promotion questionnaire and predictors of quality of care
title_short Validity and reliability of sleep promotion questionnaire and predictors of quality of care
title_sort validity and reliability of sleep promotion questionnaire and predictors of quality of care
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154749
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312118794595
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsonchae validityandreliabilityofsleeppromotionquestionnaireandpredictorsofqualityofcare
AT pedersenchase validityandreliabilityofsleeppromotionquestionnaireandpredictorsofqualityofcare
AT yicassia validityandreliabilityofsleeppromotionquestionnaireandpredictorsofqualityofcare