Cargando…
Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia can occur during gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether oxygenation using a nasal mask can reduce the incidence of hypoxemia during gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia compared with a traditional nasal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkin
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34878412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005828 |
_version_ | 1784647462123732992 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Dong Xu Yang, Hui Wu, Xi Ping Niu, Wang Ding, Lin Zeng, Huo Lin Li, Qian |
author_facet | Chen, Dong Xu Yang, Hui Wu, Xi Ping Niu, Wang Ding, Lin Zeng, Huo Lin Li, Qian |
author_sort | Chen, Dong Xu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia can occur during gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether oxygenation using a nasal mask can reduce the incidence of hypoxemia during gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia compared with a traditional nasal cannula. METHODS: A total of 574 patients scheduled for gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either a nasal mask or a traditional nasal cannula for oxygenation. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe hypoxemia, duration of hypoxemia, minimum oxygen saturation, the proportion of emergency airway management, length of procedure, recovery time, and the satisfaction of the anesthetist and gastroenterologists as well as other adverse events (including cough, hiccups, nausea and vomiting, reflux, aspiration, and laryngospasm). RESULTS: A total of 565 patients were included in the analysis: 282 patients in the nasal cannula group and 283 patients in the nasal mask group. The incidence of hypoxemia was lower in the nasal mask group (18.0%) than in the nasal cannula group (27.7%; relative risk [RR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48–0.89; P = .006), and the hypoxemia lasted a median of 18.0 seconds (interquartile range, 10.0–38.8) in the nasal mask group and 32.5 seconds (20.0–53.5) in the nasal cannula group (median difference –14.50; 95% CI, −22.82 to −1.34; P = .047). The proportion of patients requiring emergency airway management was significantly lower in the nasal mask group (8.8%) than in the nasal cannula group (19.1%; RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30–0.73; P < .001). No difference was found in the overall incidence of other adverse events between the 2 groups (nasal mask 20.8%; nasal cannula 17.0%; RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.87–1.73; P = .25). Satisfaction was higher with the nasal mask than with the nasal cannula from the perspective of anesthetists (96.1% for nasal mask versus 84.4% for nasal cannula; RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08–1.20; P < .001) and gastroenterologists (95.4% for mask versus 81.9% for cannula; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10–1.24; P < .001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of severe hypoxemia, minimum oxygen saturation, length of procedure, or recovery time between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal mask oxygenation reduced the incidence of hypoxemia during anesthesia for gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8826611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88266112022-02-17 Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial Chen, Dong Xu Yang, Hui Wu, Xi Ping Niu, Wang Ding, Lin Zeng, Huo Lin Li, Qian Anesth Analg Original Research Reports BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia can occur during gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether oxygenation using a nasal mask can reduce the incidence of hypoxemia during gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia compared with a traditional nasal cannula. METHODS: A total of 574 patients scheduled for gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either a nasal mask or a traditional nasal cannula for oxygenation. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe hypoxemia, duration of hypoxemia, minimum oxygen saturation, the proportion of emergency airway management, length of procedure, recovery time, and the satisfaction of the anesthetist and gastroenterologists as well as other adverse events (including cough, hiccups, nausea and vomiting, reflux, aspiration, and laryngospasm). RESULTS: A total of 565 patients were included in the analysis: 282 patients in the nasal cannula group and 283 patients in the nasal mask group. The incidence of hypoxemia was lower in the nasal mask group (18.0%) than in the nasal cannula group (27.7%; relative risk [RR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48–0.89; P = .006), and the hypoxemia lasted a median of 18.0 seconds (interquartile range, 10.0–38.8) in the nasal mask group and 32.5 seconds (20.0–53.5) in the nasal cannula group (median difference –14.50; 95% CI, −22.82 to −1.34; P = .047). The proportion of patients requiring emergency airway management was significantly lower in the nasal mask group (8.8%) than in the nasal cannula group (19.1%; RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30–0.73; P < .001). No difference was found in the overall incidence of other adverse events between the 2 groups (nasal mask 20.8%; nasal cannula 17.0%; RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.87–1.73; P = .25). Satisfaction was higher with the nasal mask than with the nasal cannula from the perspective of anesthetists (96.1% for nasal mask versus 84.4% for nasal cannula; RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08–1.20; P < .001) and gastroenterologists (95.4% for mask versus 81.9% for cannula; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10–1.24; P < .001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of severe hypoxemia, minimum oxygen saturation, length of procedure, or recovery time between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal mask oxygenation reduced the incidence of hypoxemia during anesthesia for gastroscopy under intravenous anesthesia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkin 2021-12-08 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8826611/ /pubmed/34878412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005828 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Anesthesia Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Reports Chen, Dong Xu Yang, Hui Wu, Xi Ping Niu, Wang Ding, Lin Zeng, Huo Lin Li, Qian Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Comparison of a Nasal Mask and Traditional Nasal Cannula During Intravenous Anesthesia for Gastroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | comparison of a nasal mask and traditional nasal cannula during intravenous anesthesia for gastroscopy procedures: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34878412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005828 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chendongxu comparisonofanasalmaskandtraditionalnasalcannuladuringintravenousanesthesiaforgastroscopyproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yanghui comparisonofanasalmaskandtraditionalnasalcannuladuringintravenousanesthesiaforgastroscopyproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wuxiping comparisonofanasalmaskandtraditionalnasalcannuladuringintravenousanesthesiaforgastroscopyproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT niuwang comparisonofanasalmaskandtraditionalnasalcannuladuringintravenousanesthesiaforgastroscopyproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dinglin comparisonofanasalmaskandtraditionalnasalcannuladuringintravenousanesthesiaforgastroscopyproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zenghuolin comparisonofanasalmaskandtraditionalnasalcannuladuringintravenousanesthesiaforgastroscopyproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liqian comparisonofanasalmaskandtraditionalnasalcannuladuringintravenousanesthesiaforgastroscopyproceduresarandomizedcontrolledtrial |