Cargando…

Effect of Bayesian penalty likelihood algorithm on 18F-FDG PET/CT image of lymphoma

Recently, a new Bayesian penalty likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm has been applied in PET, which is expected to provide better image resolution than the widely used ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM). The purpose of this study is to compare the differences between these two algo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yongtao, Lin, Lejun, Quan, Wei, Li, Jinyu, Li, Weilong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34864809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001516
_version_ 1784647462899679232
author Wang, Yongtao
Lin, Lejun
Quan, Wei
Li, Jinyu
Li, Weilong
author_facet Wang, Yongtao
Lin, Lejun
Quan, Wei
Li, Jinyu
Li, Weilong
author_sort Wang, Yongtao
collection PubMed
description Recently, a new Bayesian penalty likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm has been applied in PET, which is expected to provide better image resolution than the widely used ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM). The purpose of this study is to compare the differences between these two algorithms in terms of image quality and effects on clinical diagnostics and quantification of lymphoma. METHODS: A total of 246 FDG-positive lesions in 70 patients with lymphoma were retrospectively analyzed by using BPL and OSEM + time-of-flight + point spread function algorithms. Visual analysis was used to evaluate the effects of different reconstruction algorithms on clinical image quality and diagnostic certainty. Quantitative analysis was used to compare the differences between pathology and lesion size. RESULTS: There were significant differences in lesion-related SUVmax, total-lesion-glycolysis (TLG), and signal-to-background ratio (SBR) (P < 0.01). The variation Δ SUVmax% and Δ SBR% caused by the two reconstruction algorithms were negatively correlated with tumor diameter, while Δ MTV% and Δ TLG% were positively correlated with tumor diameter. In the grouped analysis based on pathology, there were significant differences in lesion SUVmax, lesion SUVmean, and SBR. In non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (diffuse large B cells and follicular lymphoma), diversities were significantly found in SUVmax, SUVmean, SBR, and TLG of the lesions (P < 0.05). According to the grouped analysis based on lesion size, for lesions smaller than 1 cm and 2 cm, there was a significant difference in SUVmean, SUVmax, SBR, and MTV, but not in lesions larger than or equal to 2 cm (P > 0.05), and the liver background SUVmean (P > 0.05) remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: BPL reconstruction algorithm could effectively improve clinical image quality and diagnostic certainty. In quantitative analysis, there were no significant differences among different pathological groups, but there were significant diversities in lesion sizes. Especially for small lesions, lesion SUVmax increased and SBR was significantly improved, which may better assist in the diagnosis of small lesions of lymphoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8826614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88266142022-02-17 Effect of Bayesian penalty likelihood algorithm on 18F-FDG PET/CT image of lymphoma Wang, Yongtao Lin, Lejun Quan, Wei Li, Jinyu Li, Weilong Nucl Med Commun Original Articles Recently, a new Bayesian penalty likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithm has been applied in PET, which is expected to provide better image resolution than the widely used ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM). The purpose of this study is to compare the differences between these two algorithms in terms of image quality and effects on clinical diagnostics and quantification of lymphoma. METHODS: A total of 246 FDG-positive lesions in 70 patients with lymphoma were retrospectively analyzed by using BPL and OSEM + time-of-flight + point spread function algorithms. Visual analysis was used to evaluate the effects of different reconstruction algorithms on clinical image quality and diagnostic certainty. Quantitative analysis was used to compare the differences between pathology and lesion size. RESULTS: There were significant differences in lesion-related SUVmax, total-lesion-glycolysis (TLG), and signal-to-background ratio (SBR) (P < 0.01). The variation Δ SUVmax% and Δ SBR% caused by the two reconstruction algorithms were negatively correlated with tumor diameter, while Δ MTV% and Δ TLG% were positively correlated with tumor diameter. In the grouped analysis based on pathology, there were significant differences in lesion SUVmax, lesion SUVmean, and SBR. In non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (diffuse large B cells and follicular lymphoma), diversities were significantly found in SUVmax, SUVmean, SBR, and TLG of the lesions (P < 0.05). According to the grouped analysis based on lesion size, for lesions smaller than 1 cm and 2 cm, there was a significant difference in SUVmean, SUVmax, SBR, and MTV, but not in lesions larger than or equal to 2 cm (P > 0.05), and the liver background SUVmean (P > 0.05) remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: BPL reconstruction algorithm could effectively improve clinical image quality and diagnostic certainty. In quantitative analysis, there were no significant differences among different pathological groups, but there were significant diversities in lesion sizes. Especially for small lesions, lesion SUVmax increased and SBR was significantly improved, which may better assist in the diagnosis of small lesions of lymphoma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-12-13 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8826614/ /pubmed/34864809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001516 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wang, Yongtao
Lin, Lejun
Quan, Wei
Li, Jinyu
Li, Weilong
Effect of Bayesian penalty likelihood algorithm on 18F-FDG PET/CT image of lymphoma
title Effect of Bayesian penalty likelihood algorithm on 18F-FDG PET/CT image of lymphoma
title_full Effect of Bayesian penalty likelihood algorithm on 18F-FDG PET/CT image of lymphoma
title_fullStr Effect of Bayesian penalty likelihood algorithm on 18F-FDG PET/CT image of lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Bayesian penalty likelihood algorithm on 18F-FDG PET/CT image of lymphoma
title_short Effect of Bayesian penalty likelihood algorithm on 18F-FDG PET/CT image of lymphoma
title_sort effect of bayesian penalty likelihood algorithm on 18f-fdg pet/ct image of lymphoma
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34864809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001516
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyongtao effectofbayesianpenaltylikelihoodalgorithmon18ffdgpetctimageoflymphoma
AT linlejun effectofbayesianpenaltylikelihoodalgorithmon18ffdgpetctimageoflymphoma
AT quanwei effectofbayesianpenaltylikelihoodalgorithmon18ffdgpetctimageoflymphoma
AT lijinyu effectofbayesianpenaltylikelihoodalgorithmon18ffdgpetctimageoflymphoma
AT liweilong effectofbayesianpenaltylikelihoodalgorithmon18ffdgpetctimageoflymphoma