Cargando…

Humility in medical practice: a qualitative study of peer-nominated excellent clinicians

BACKGROUND: Humility has recently been conceptualized as a positive, multifaceted attribute in fields outside of medicine, such as psychology and philosophy. In medicine, there has been limited study into the nature of humility and its role in clinical practice. We sought to develop a deeper underst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wadhwa, Anupma, Mahant, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03146-8
_version_ 1784647470585741312
author Wadhwa, Anupma
Mahant, Sanjay
author_facet Wadhwa, Anupma
Mahant, Sanjay
author_sort Wadhwa, Anupma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Humility has recently been conceptualized as a positive, multifaceted attribute in fields outside of medicine, such as psychology and philosophy. In medicine, there has been limited study into the nature of humility and its role in clinical practice. We sought to develop a deeper understanding of humility in medical practice through the lived-experiences of peer-nominated excellent clinicians. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with secondary analysis of transcripts from individual open ended, semi-structured interviews of 13 peer nominated physicians [7 (54%) female] at an academic centre. Using constant comparative analysis, the transcripts were analyzed for instances where humility was discussed as it related to clinical practice. RESULTS: Participants perceived humility to be an important driver for excellence in clinical practice. This was further explained using two overarching themes: an inward, intellectual perspective and an outward, social perspective. The physician’s inward perspective was their view of their abilities and limits, their self-confidence, and their intellectual openness and adaptability to the limitations and evolving nature of knowledge in medicine. Their outward perspective was an understanding and appreciation for the larger system in which they worked, an openness to others, and valuing patients’ experience. Through these perspectives, humility positively influenced clinical care, learning and curiosity, motivation in the care of others, and relationships with team members and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Humility in medicine is a rich, multifaceted construct that was perceived to be a driver for excellence in medical practice by peer-nominated excellent clinicians. Humility was seen as an active force in formulating and calibrating a clinician’s perspective of self and of others, and as such, positively influencing clinical practice. These findings will help inform a discourse in medical education and faculty development about the important role of humility in medical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03146-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8826652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88266522022-02-10 Humility in medical practice: a qualitative study of peer-nominated excellent clinicians Wadhwa, Anupma Mahant, Sanjay BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Humility has recently been conceptualized as a positive, multifaceted attribute in fields outside of medicine, such as psychology and philosophy. In medicine, there has been limited study into the nature of humility and its role in clinical practice. We sought to develop a deeper understanding of humility in medical practice through the lived-experiences of peer-nominated excellent clinicians. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with secondary analysis of transcripts from individual open ended, semi-structured interviews of 13 peer nominated physicians [7 (54%) female] at an academic centre. Using constant comparative analysis, the transcripts were analyzed for instances where humility was discussed as it related to clinical practice. RESULTS: Participants perceived humility to be an important driver for excellence in clinical practice. This was further explained using two overarching themes: an inward, intellectual perspective and an outward, social perspective. The physician’s inward perspective was their view of their abilities and limits, their self-confidence, and their intellectual openness and adaptability to the limitations and evolving nature of knowledge in medicine. Their outward perspective was an understanding and appreciation for the larger system in which they worked, an openness to others, and valuing patients’ experience. Through these perspectives, humility positively influenced clinical care, learning and curiosity, motivation in the care of others, and relationships with team members and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Humility in medicine is a rich, multifaceted construct that was perceived to be a driver for excellence in medical practice by peer-nominated excellent clinicians. Humility was seen as an active force in formulating and calibrating a clinician’s perspective of self and of others, and as such, positively influencing clinical practice. These findings will help inform a discourse in medical education and faculty development about the important role of humility in medical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03146-8. BioMed Central 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8826652/ /pubmed/35139833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03146-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wadhwa, Anupma
Mahant, Sanjay
Humility in medical practice: a qualitative study of peer-nominated excellent clinicians
title Humility in medical practice: a qualitative study of peer-nominated excellent clinicians
title_full Humility in medical practice: a qualitative study of peer-nominated excellent clinicians
title_fullStr Humility in medical practice: a qualitative study of peer-nominated excellent clinicians
title_full_unstemmed Humility in medical practice: a qualitative study of peer-nominated excellent clinicians
title_short Humility in medical practice: a qualitative study of peer-nominated excellent clinicians
title_sort humility in medical practice: a qualitative study of peer-nominated excellent clinicians
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03146-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wadhwaanupma humilityinmedicalpracticeaqualitativestudyofpeernominatedexcellentclinicians
AT mahantsanjay humilityinmedicalpracticeaqualitativestudyofpeernominatedexcellentclinicians