Cargando…

Direct comparison of the next-generation sequencing and iTERT PCR methods for the diagnosis of TERT hotspot mutations in advanced solid cancers

BACKGROUND: Mutations in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter region have been proposed as novel mechanisms for the transcriptional activation of telomerase. Two recurrent mutations in the TERT promoter, C228T and C250T, are prognostic biomarkers. Herein, we directly compared the com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, So Young, Kim, Deok Geun, Kim, Hyunjin, Cho, Yoon Ah, Ha, Sang Yun, Kwon, Ghee Young, Jang, Kee-Taek, Kim, Kyoung-Mee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01175-2
_version_ 1784647595016060928
author Kang, So Young
Kim, Deok Geun
Kim, Hyunjin
Cho, Yoon Ah
Ha, Sang Yun
Kwon, Ghee Young
Jang, Kee-Taek
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
author_facet Kang, So Young
Kim, Deok Geun
Kim, Hyunjin
Cho, Yoon Ah
Ha, Sang Yun
Kwon, Ghee Young
Jang, Kee-Taek
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
author_sort Kang, So Young
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mutations in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter region have been proposed as novel mechanisms for the transcriptional activation of telomerase. Two recurrent mutations in the TERT promoter, C228T and C250T, are prognostic biomarkers. Herein, we directly compared the commercially available iTERT PCR kit with NGS-based deep sequencing to validate the NGS results and determine the analytical sensitivity of the PCR kit. METHODS: Of the 2032 advanced solid tumors diagnosed using the TruSight Oncology 500 NGS test, mutations in the TERT promoter region were detected in 103 cases, with 79 cases of C228T, 22 cases of C250T, and 2 cases of C228A hotspot mutations. TERT promoter mutations were detected from 31 urinary bladder, 19 pancreato-biliary, 22 hepatic, 12 malignant melanoma, and 12 other tumor samples. RESULTS: In all 103 TERT-mutated cases detected using NGS, the same DNA samples were also tested with the iTERT PCR/Sanger sequencing. PCR successfully verified the presence of the same mutations in all cases with 100% agreement. The average read depth of the TERT promoter region was 320.4, which was significantly lower than that of the other genes (mean, 743.5). Interestingly, NGS read depth was significantly higher at C250 compared to C228 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The NGS test results were validated by a PCR test and iTERT PCR/Sanger sequencing is sensitive for the identification of the TERT promoter mutations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8827275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88272752022-02-10 Direct comparison of the next-generation sequencing and iTERT PCR methods for the diagnosis of TERT hotspot mutations in advanced solid cancers Kang, So Young Kim, Deok Geun Kim, Hyunjin Cho, Yoon Ah Ha, Sang Yun Kwon, Ghee Young Jang, Kee-Taek Kim, Kyoung-Mee BMC Med Genomics Research BACKGROUND: Mutations in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter region have been proposed as novel mechanisms for the transcriptional activation of telomerase. Two recurrent mutations in the TERT promoter, C228T and C250T, are prognostic biomarkers. Herein, we directly compared the commercially available iTERT PCR kit with NGS-based deep sequencing to validate the NGS results and determine the analytical sensitivity of the PCR kit. METHODS: Of the 2032 advanced solid tumors diagnosed using the TruSight Oncology 500 NGS test, mutations in the TERT promoter region were detected in 103 cases, with 79 cases of C228T, 22 cases of C250T, and 2 cases of C228A hotspot mutations. TERT promoter mutations were detected from 31 urinary bladder, 19 pancreato-biliary, 22 hepatic, 12 malignant melanoma, and 12 other tumor samples. RESULTS: In all 103 TERT-mutated cases detected using NGS, the same DNA samples were also tested with the iTERT PCR/Sanger sequencing. PCR successfully verified the presence of the same mutations in all cases with 100% agreement. The average read depth of the TERT promoter region was 320.4, which was significantly lower than that of the other genes (mean, 743.5). Interestingly, NGS read depth was significantly higher at C250 compared to C228 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The NGS test results were validated by a PCR test and iTERT PCR/Sanger sequencing is sensitive for the identification of the TERT promoter mutations. BioMed Central 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8827275/ /pubmed/35135543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01175-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kang, So Young
Kim, Deok Geun
Kim, Hyunjin
Cho, Yoon Ah
Ha, Sang Yun
Kwon, Ghee Young
Jang, Kee-Taek
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
Direct comparison of the next-generation sequencing and iTERT PCR methods for the diagnosis of TERT hotspot mutations in advanced solid cancers
title Direct comparison of the next-generation sequencing and iTERT PCR methods for the diagnosis of TERT hotspot mutations in advanced solid cancers
title_full Direct comparison of the next-generation sequencing and iTERT PCR methods for the diagnosis of TERT hotspot mutations in advanced solid cancers
title_fullStr Direct comparison of the next-generation sequencing and iTERT PCR methods for the diagnosis of TERT hotspot mutations in advanced solid cancers
title_full_unstemmed Direct comparison of the next-generation sequencing and iTERT PCR methods for the diagnosis of TERT hotspot mutations in advanced solid cancers
title_short Direct comparison of the next-generation sequencing and iTERT PCR methods for the diagnosis of TERT hotspot mutations in advanced solid cancers
title_sort direct comparison of the next-generation sequencing and itert pcr methods for the diagnosis of tert hotspot mutations in advanced solid cancers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01175-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kangsoyoung directcomparisonofthenextgenerationsequencinganditertpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofterthotspotmutationsinadvancedsolidcancers
AT kimdeokgeun directcomparisonofthenextgenerationsequencinganditertpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofterthotspotmutationsinadvancedsolidcancers
AT kimhyunjin directcomparisonofthenextgenerationsequencinganditertpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofterthotspotmutationsinadvancedsolidcancers
AT choyoonah directcomparisonofthenextgenerationsequencinganditertpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofterthotspotmutationsinadvancedsolidcancers
AT hasangyun directcomparisonofthenextgenerationsequencinganditertpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofterthotspotmutationsinadvancedsolidcancers
AT kwongheeyoung directcomparisonofthenextgenerationsequencinganditertpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofterthotspotmutationsinadvancedsolidcancers
AT jangkeetaek directcomparisonofthenextgenerationsequencinganditertpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofterthotspotmutationsinadvancedsolidcancers
AT kimkyoungmee directcomparisonofthenextgenerationsequencinganditertpcrmethodsforthediagnosisofterthotspotmutationsinadvancedsolidcancers