Cargando…

Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality

BACKGROUND: Access to reliable information is critical to women’s experience and wellbeing during pregnancy and childbirth. In our information-rich society, women are exposed to a wide range of information sources. The primary objective of this study was to explore women’s use of information sources...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogels-Broeke, Maaike, Daemers, Darie, Budé, Luc, de Vries, Raymond, Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04422-7
_version_ 1784647596456804352
author Vogels-Broeke, Maaike
Daemers, Darie
Budé, Luc
de Vries, Raymond
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
author_facet Vogels-Broeke, Maaike
Daemers, Darie
Budé, Luc
de Vries, Raymond
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
author_sort Vogels-Broeke, Maaike
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Access to reliable information is critical to women’s experience and wellbeing during pregnancy and childbirth. In our information-rich society, women are exposed to a wide range of information sources. The primary objective of this study was to explore women’s use of information sources during pregnancy and to examine the perceived usefulness and trustworthiness of these sources. METHOD: A quantitative cross-sectional study of Dutch women's experiences with various information sources during pregnancy, including professional (e.g. healthcare system), and informal sources, divided into conventional (e.g. family or peers) and digital sources (e.g. websites or apps). Exploratory backward stepwise multiple regression was performed to identify associations between the perceived quality of information sources and personal characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 1922 pregnant women were included in this study. The most commonly used information sources were midwives (91.5%), family or friends (79.3%), websites (77.9%), and apps (61%). More than 80% of women found professional information sources trustworthy and useful, while digital sources were perceived as less trustworthy and useful. Personal factors explain only a small part of the variation in the perceived quality of information sources. CONCLUSION: Even though digital sources are perceived as less trustworthy and useful than professional and conventional sources, they are among the most commonly used sources of information for pregnant women. To meet the information needs of the contemporary generation of pregnant women it is essential that professionals help in the development of digital information sources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8827281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88272812022-02-10 Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality Vogels-Broeke, Maaike Daemers, Darie Budé, Luc de Vries, Raymond Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Access to reliable information is critical to women’s experience and wellbeing during pregnancy and childbirth. In our information-rich society, women are exposed to a wide range of information sources. The primary objective of this study was to explore women’s use of information sources during pregnancy and to examine the perceived usefulness and trustworthiness of these sources. METHOD: A quantitative cross-sectional study of Dutch women's experiences with various information sources during pregnancy, including professional (e.g. healthcare system), and informal sources, divided into conventional (e.g. family or peers) and digital sources (e.g. websites or apps). Exploratory backward stepwise multiple regression was performed to identify associations between the perceived quality of information sources and personal characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 1922 pregnant women were included in this study. The most commonly used information sources were midwives (91.5%), family or friends (79.3%), websites (77.9%), and apps (61%). More than 80% of women found professional information sources trustworthy and useful, while digital sources were perceived as less trustworthy and useful. Personal factors explain only a small part of the variation in the perceived quality of information sources. CONCLUSION: Even though digital sources are perceived as less trustworthy and useful than professional and conventional sources, they are among the most commonly used sources of information for pregnant women. To meet the information needs of the contemporary generation of pregnant women it is essential that professionals help in the development of digital information sources. BioMed Central 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8827281/ /pubmed/35135487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04422-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Vogels-Broeke, Maaike
Daemers, Darie
Budé, Luc
de Vries, Raymond
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality
title Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality
title_full Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality
title_fullStr Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality
title_full_unstemmed Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality
title_short Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality
title_sort sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04422-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vogelsbroekemaaike sourcesofinformationusedbywomenduringpregnancyandtheperceivedquality
AT daemersdarie sourcesofinformationusedbywomenduringpregnancyandtheperceivedquality
AT budeluc sourcesofinformationusedbywomenduringpregnancyandtheperceivedquality
AT devriesraymond sourcesofinformationusedbywomenduringpregnancyandtheperceivedquality
AT nieuwenhuijzemarianne sourcesofinformationusedbywomenduringpregnancyandtheperceivedquality