Cargando…
Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality
BACKGROUND: Access to reliable information is critical to women’s experience and wellbeing during pregnancy and childbirth. In our information-rich society, women are exposed to a wide range of information sources. The primary objective of this study was to explore women’s use of information sources...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04422-7 |
_version_ | 1784647596456804352 |
---|---|
author | Vogels-Broeke, Maaike Daemers, Darie Budé, Luc de Vries, Raymond Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne |
author_facet | Vogels-Broeke, Maaike Daemers, Darie Budé, Luc de Vries, Raymond Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne |
author_sort | Vogels-Broeke, Maaike |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Access to reliable information is critical to women’s experience and wellbeing during pregnancy and childbirth. In our information-rich society, women are exposed to a wide range of information sources. The primary objective of this study was to explore women’s use of information sources during pregnancy and to examine the perceived usefulness and trustworthiness of these sources. METHOD: A quantitative cross-sectional study of Dutch women's experiences with various information sources during pregnancy, including professional (e.g. healthcare system), and informal sources, divided into conventional (e.g. family or peers) and digital sources (e.g. websites or apps). Exploratory backward stepwise multiple regression was performed to identify associations between the perceived quality of information sources and personal characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 1922 pregnant women were included in this study. The most commonly used information sources were midwives (91.5%), family or friends (79.3%), websites (77.9%), and apps (61%). More than 80% of women found professional information sources trustworthy and useful, while digital sources were perceived as less trustworthy and useful. Personal factors explain only a small part of the variation in the perceived quality of information sources. CONCLUSION: Even though digital sources are perceived as less trustworthy and useful than professional and conventional sources, they are among the most commonly used sources of information for pregnant women. To meet the information needs of the contemporary generation of pregnant women it is essential that professionals help in the development of digital information sources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8827281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88272812022-02-10 Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality Vogels-Broeke, Maaike Daemers, Darie Budé, Luc de Vries, Raymond Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Access to reliable information is critical to women’s experience and wellbeing during pregnancy and childbirth. In our information-rich society, women are exposed to a wide range of information sources. The primary objective of this study was to explore women’s use of information sources during pregnancy and to examine the perceived usefulness and trustworthiness of these sources. METHOD: A quantitative cross-sectional study of Dutch women's experiences with various information sources during pregnancy, including professional (e.g. healthcare system), and informal sources, divided into conventional (e.g. family or peers) and digital sources (e.g. websites or apps). Exploratory backward stepwise multiple regression was performed to identify associations between the perceived quality of information sources and personal characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 1922 pregnant women were included in this study. The most commonly used information sources were midwives (91.5%), family or friends (79.3%), websites (77.9%), and apps (61%). More than 80% of women found professional information sources trustworthy and useful, while digital sources were perceived as less trustworthy and useful. Personal factors explain only a small part of the variation in the perceived quality of information sources. CONCLUSION: Even though digital sources are perceived as less trustworthy and useful than professional and conventional sources, they are among the most commonly used sources of information for pregnant women. To meet the information needs of the contemporary generation of pregnant women it is essential that professionals help in the development of digital information sources. BioMed Central 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8827281/ /pubmed/35135487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04422-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Vogels-Broeke, Maaike Daemers, Darie Budé, Luc de Vries, Raymond Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality |
title | Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality |
title_full | Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality |
title_fullStr | Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality |
title_short | Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality |
title_sort | sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04422-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vogelsbroekemaaike sourcesofinformationusedbywomenduringpregnancyandtheperceivedquality AT daemersdarie sourcesofinformationusedbywomenduringpregnancyandtheperceivedquality AT budeluc sourcesofinformationusedbywomenduringpregnancyandtheperceivedquality AT devriesraymond sourcesofinformationusedbywomenduringpregnancyandtheperceivedquality AT nieuwenhuijzemarianne sourcesofinformationusedbywomenduringpregnancyandtheperceivedquality |