Cargando…

A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function

It is known that resistance exercise using one limb can affect motor function of both the exercised limb and the unexercised contralateral limb, a phenomenon termed cross-education. It has been suggested that cross-education has clinical implications, e.g. in rehabilitation for orthopaedic condition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Shi, Zhang, Shuang-Shuang, Crowley-McHattan, Zachary J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263662
_version_ 1784647628251725824
author Zhou, Shi
Zhang, Shuang-Shuang
Crowley-McHattan, Zachary J.
author_facet Zhou, Shi
Zhang, Shuang-Shuang
Crowley-McHattan, Zachary J.
author_sort Zhou, Shi
collection PubMed
description It is known that resistance exercise using one limb can affect motor function of both the exercised limb and the unexercised contralateral limb, a phenomenon termed cross-education. It has been suggested that cross-education has clinical implications, e.g. in rehabilitation for orthopaedic conditions or post-stroke paresis. Much of the research on the contralateral effect of unilateral intervention on motor output is based on voluntary exercise. This scoping review aimed to map the characteristics of current literature on the cross-education caused by three most frequently utilised peripheral neuromuscular stimulation modalities in this context: electrical stimulation, mechanical vibration and percutaneous needling, that may direct future research and translate to clinical practice. A systematic search of relevant databases (Ebsco, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) through to the end of 2020 was conducted following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review. Empirical studies on human participants that applied a unilateral peripheral neuromuscular stimulation and assessed neuromuscular function of the stimulated and/or the unstimulated side were selected. By reading the full text, the demographic characteristics, context, design, methods and major findings of the studies were synthesised. The results found that 83 studies were eligible for the review, with the majority (53) utilised electrical stimulation whilst those applied vibration (18) or needling (12) were emerging. Although the contralateral effects appeared to be robust, only 31 studies claimed to be in the context of cross-education, and 25 investigated on clinical patients. The underlying mechanism for the contralateral effects induced by unilateral peripheral stimulation remains unclear. The findings suggest a need to enhance the awareness of cross-education caused by peripheral stimulation, to help improve the translation of theoretical concepts to clinical practice, and aid in developing well-designed clinical trials to determine the efficacy of cross-education therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8827438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88274382022-02-10 A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function Zhou, Shi Zhang, Shuang-Shuang Crowley-McHattan, Zachary J. PLoS One Research Article It is known that resistance exercise using one limb can affect motor function of both the exercised limb and the unexercised contralateral limb, a phenomenon termed cross-education. It has been suggested that cross-education has clinical implications, e.g. in rehabilitation for orthopaedic conditions or post-stroke paresis. Much of the research on the contralateral effect of unilateral intervention on motor output is based on voluntary exercise. This scoping review aimed to map the characteristics of current literature on the cross-education caused by three most frequently utilised peripheral neuromuscular stimulation modalities in this context: electrical stimulation, mechanical vibration and percutaneous needling, that may direct future research and translate to clinical practice. A systematic search of relevant databases (Ebsco, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) through to the end of 2020 was conducted following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review. Empirical studies on human participants that applied a unilateral peripheral neuromuscular stimulation and assessed neuromuscular function of the stimulated and/or the unstimulated side were selected. By reading the full text, the demographic characteristics, context, design, methods and major findings of the studies were synthesised. The results found that 83 studies were eligible for the review, with the majority (53) utilised electrical stimulation whilst those applied vibration (18) or needling (12) were emerging. Although the contralateral effects appeared to be robust, only 31 studies claimed to be in the context of cross-education, and 25 investigated on clinical patients. The underlying mechanism for the contralateral effects induced by unilateral peripheral stimulation remains unclear. The findings suggest a need to enhance the awareness of cross-education caused by peripheral stimulation, to help improve the translation of theoretical concepts to clinical practice, and aid in developing well-designed clinical trials to determine the efficacy of cross-education therapies. Public Library of Science 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8827438/ /pubmed/35139128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263662 Text en © 2022 Zhou et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Shi
Zhang, Shuang-Shuang
Crowley-McHattan, Zachary J.
A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function
title A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function
title_full A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function
title_fullStr A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function
title_short A scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function
title_sort scoping review of the contralateral effects of unilateral peripheral stimulation on neuromuscular function
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263662
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoushi ascopingreviewofthecontralateraleffectsofunilateralperipheralstimulationonneuromuscularfunction
AT zhangshuangshuang ascopingreviewofthecontralateraleffectsofunilateralperipheralstimulationonneuromuscularfunction
AT crowleymchattanzacharyj ascopingreviewofthecontralateraleffectsofunilateralperipheralstimulationonneuromuscularfunction
AT zhoushi scopingreviewofthecontralateraleffectsofunilateralperipheralstimulationonneuromuscularfunction
AT zhangshuangshuang scopingreviewofthecontralateraleffectsofunilateralperipheralstimulationonneuromuscularfunction
AT crowleymchattanzacharyj scopingreviewofthecontralateraleffectsofunilateralperipheralstimulationonneuromuscularfunction