Cargando…

82003 Network Evaluation of a Community-Campus Partnership: Applying a Systems Science Lens to Evaluating Collaboration and Translation

ABSTRACT IMPACT: Using network analysis and a systems science lens, UTMB’s Institute for Translational Sciences is able to quantify the evolution of REACH (its Community-Campus Partnership) as measured by the creation of new partnerships among member entities, promoting the translation and sharing o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prochaska, John D., Croisant, Sharon, Sommer, Lesley C., Treble, Neil, Bohn, Krista, Wiseman, Lori, Singleton, Chantele, Hallberg, Lance
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827874/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.612
_version_ 1784647734666461184
author Prochaska, John D.
Croisant, Sharon
Sommer, Lesley C.
Treble, Neil
Bohn, Krista
Wiseman, Lori
Singleton, Chantele
Hallberg, Lance
author_facet Prochaska, John D.
Croisant, Sharon
Sommer, Lesley C.
Treble, Neil
Bohn, Krista
Wiseman, Lori
Singleton, Chantele
Hallberg, Lance
author_sort Prochaska, John D.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT IMPACT: Using network analysis and a systems science lens, UTMB’s Institute for Translational Sciences is able to quantify the evolution of REACH (its Community-Campus Partnership) as measured by the creation of new partnerships among member entities, promoting the translation and sharing of ideas and resources, and formalization of relationships among members. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: o Present how network analysis and systems science can inform evaluation of community-campus partnerships o Describe results from our experience with evaluating the REACH coalition o Summarize lessons-learned and likely improvements we are considering for our methodology METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In 2016, we administered a network survey to core members of the Research, Education, and Community Health (REACH) coalition. The survey captured attributes about each organization, including size, populations served, etc. The survey also captured data on the relationships among these organizations, including joint meeting attendance, joint event planning, shared tangible resources, shared information, and formal legal agreements between organizations. These data were analyzed using network analysis methods. The survey was again repeated in 2018, and comparisons were made to evaluate how the network structure had evolved from 2016 to 2018. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Joint meeting attendance was high in both 2016 and 2018; however, there was evidence of increased sharing of information and tangible resources in 2018. We also observed an increase in joint event planning among partnering agencies. Most strikingly, we observed that the number of formalized agreements (in the form of Memoranda of Understanding or more formalized contracts) between agencies more than doubled between 2016 and 2018. By measuring the evolution of our network of partners, we are able to document the evolution of a community-campus partnership over time. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Over the course of 2 years, the coalition signaled an increase in deeper collaborations beyond simply meeting together. The use of network analysis demonstrated utility and provided another dimension for evaluating the development of teams, partnerships, and coalitions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8827874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88278742022-03-04 82003 Network Evaluation of a Community-Campus Partnership: Applying a Systems Science Lens to Evaluating Collaboration and Translation Prochaska, John D. Croisant, Sharon Sommer, Lesley C. Treble, Neil Bohn, Krista Wiseman, Lori Singleton, Chantele Hallberg, Lance J Clin Transl Sci Health Equity & Community Engagement ABSTRACT IMPACT: Using network analysis and a systems science lens, UTMB’s Institute for Translational Sciences is able to quantify the evolution of REACH (its Community-Campus Partnership) as measured by the creation of new partnerships among member entities, promoting the translation and sharing of ideas and resources, and formalization of relationships among members. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: o Present how network analysis and systems science can inform evaluation of community-campus partnerships o Describe results from our experience with evaluating the REACH coalition o Summarize lessons-learned and likely improvements we are considering for our methodology METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In 2016, we administered a network survey to core members of the Research, Education, and Community Health (REACH) coalition. The survey captured attributes about each organization, including size, populations served, etc. The survey also captured data on the relationships among these organizations, including joint meeting attendance, joint event planning, shared tangible resources, shared information, and formal legal agreements between organizations. These data were analyzed using network analysis methods. The survey was again repeated in 2018, and comparisons were made to evaluate how the network structure had evolved from 2016 to 2018. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Joint meeting attendance was high in both 2016 and 2018; however, there was evidence of increased sharing of information and tangible resources in 2018. We also observed an increase in joint event planning among partnering agencies. Most strikingly, we observed that the number of formalized agreements (in the form of Memoranda of Understanding or more formalized contracts) between agencies more than doubled between 2016 and 2018. By measuring the evolution of our network of partners, we are able to document the evolution of a community-campus partnership over time. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Over the course of 2 years, the coalition signaled an increase in deeper collaborations beyond simply meeting together. The use of network analysis demonstrated utility and provided another dimension for evaluating the development of teams, partnerships, and coalitions. Cambridge University Press 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8827874/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.612 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Health Equity & Community Engagement
Prochaska, John D.
Croisant, Sharon
Sommer, Lesley C.
Treble, Neil
Bohn, Krista
Wiseman, Lori
Singleton, Chantele
Hallberg, Lance
82003 Network Evaluation of a Community-Campus Partnership: Applying a Systems Science Lens to Evaluating Collaboration and Translation
title 82003 Network Evaluation of a Community-Campus Partnership: Applying a Systems Science Lens to Evaluating Collaboration and Translation
title_full 82003 Network Evaluation of a Community-Campus Partnership: Applying a Systems Science Lens to Evaluating Collaboration and Translation
title_fullStr 82003 Network Evaluation of a Community-Campus Partnership: Applying a Systems Science Lens to Evaluating Collaboration and Translation
title_full_unstemmed 82003 Network Evaluation of a Community-Campus Partnership: Applying a Systems Science Lens to Evaluating Collaboration and Translation
title_short 82003 Network Evaluation of a Community-Campus Partnership: Applying a Systems Science Lens to Evaluating Collaboration and Translation
title_sort 82003 network evaluation of a community-campus partnership: applying a systems science lens to evaluating collaboration and translation
topic Health Equity & Community Engagement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827874/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.612
work_keys_str_mv AT prochaskajohnd 82003networkevaluationofacommunitycampuspartnershipapplyingasystemssciencelenstoevaluatingcollaborationandtranslation
AT croisantsharon 82003networkevaluationofacommunitycampuspartnershipapplyingasystemssciencelenstoevaluatingcollaborationandtranslation
AT sommerlesleyc 82003networkevaluationofacommunitycampuspartnershipapplyingasystemssciencelenstoevaluatingcollaborationandtranslation
AT trebleneil 82003networkevaluationofacommunitycampuspartnershipapplyingasystemssciencelenstoevaluatingcollaborationandtranslation
AT bohnkrista 82003networkevaluationofacommunitycampuspartnershipapplyingasystemssciencelenstoevaluatingcollaborationandtranslation
AT wisemanlori 82003networkevaluationofacommunitycampuspartnershipapplyingasystemssciencelenstoevaluatingcollaborationandtranslation
AT singletonchantele 82003networkevaluationofacommunitycampuspartnershipapplyingasystemssciencelenstoevaluatingcollaborationandtranslation
AT hallberglance 82003networkevaluationofacommunitycampuspartnershipapplyingasystemssciencelenstoevaluatingcollaborationandtranslation