Cargando…
91756 A participatory approach to develop regional health priorities for clinical and translational research
ABSTRACT IMPACT: Regional health issues can be best addressed at the population-level and input from the communities is vital for prioritization of health issues. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Great Plains IDeA-CTR (GP IDeA-CTR) was developed to increase clinical and translational research (CTR) that can ad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827908/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.749 |
_version_ | 1784647742872616960 |
---|---|
author | Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu Estabrooks, Paul Palm, David Navarrette, Sean Keeler, Heidi King, Keyonna Frankel, Emily |
author_facet | Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu Estabrooks, Paul Palm, David Navarrette, Sean Keeler, Heidi King, Keyonna Frankel, Emily |
author_sort | Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT IMPACT: Regional health issues can be best addressed at the population-level and input from the communities is vital for prioritization of health issues. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Great Plains IDeA-CTR (GP IDeA-CTR) was developed to increase clinical and translational research (CTR) that can address regional health priorities. Here we describe a collaborative process used to identify regional health priorities using existing surveillance data and community input. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We used a participatory approach that included a partnership between the GP IDeA CTR Community-Engagement and Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design Cores to ensure priorities were data driven and also aligned with community-based perceptions of need. First, aggregated surveillance data across Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota was presented to the GP IDeA CTR Community Advisory Board (CAB). Second, CAB members formed small groups and considered the information and generated priority health area lists. Third, small group lists were considered and discussed by the full CAB to finalize priority areas. Finally, the CAB reviewed the priorities annually thereafter. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We identified priority areas for CTR that included (1) behavioral health, (2) injury prevention, (3) obesity, (4) technology to improve health care access, (5) connecting clinical/community services, and (5) addressing health disparities. These priorities align with population-based surveillance data that show lack of mental health care access, high prevalence of obesity, higher incidence of accidents, and existing racial, ethnic, and geographic health disparities. The CAB highlighted that research was also needed to improve how people can access the health innovations developed through CTR to address the other priority health issues with a goal to have an impact on population health. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: By integrating data- and community-driven approaches we identified regional health priority areas that if addressed, can have significant impact in the GP IDeA CTR region. The priorities are listed on all GP IDeA-CTR funding announcements to encourage CTR in these areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8827908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88279082022-02-28 91756 A participatory approach to develop regional health priorities for clinical and translational research Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu Estabrooks, Paul Palm, David Navarrette, Sean Keeler, Heidi King, Keyonna Frankel, Emily J Clin Transl Sci Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science ABSTRACT IMPACT: Regional health issues can be best addressed at the population-level and input from the communities is vital for prioritization of health issues. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The Great Plains IDeA-CTR (GP IDeA-CTR) was developed to increase clinical and translational research (CTR) that can address regional health priorities. Here we describe a collaborative process used to identify regional health priorities using existing surveillance data and community input. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We used a participatory approach that included a partnership between the GP IDeA CTR Community-Engagement and Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design Cores to ensure priorities were data driven and also aligned with community-based perceptions of need. First, aggregated surveillance data across Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota was presented to the GP IDeA CTR Community Advisory Board (CAB). Second, CAB members formed small groups and considered the information and generated priority health area lists. Third, small group lists were considered and discussed by the full CAB to finalize priority areas. Finally, the CAB reviewed the priorities annually thereafter. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We identified priority areas for CTR that included (1) behavioral health, (2) injury prevention, (3) obesity, (4) technology to improve health care access, (5) connecting clinical/community services, and (5) addressing health disparities. These priorities align with population-based surveillance data that show lack of mental health care access, high prevalence of obesity, higher incidence of accidents, and existing racial, ethnic, and geographic health disparities. The CAB highlighted that research was also needed to improve how people can access the health innovations developed through CTR to address the other priority health issues with a goal to have an impact on population health. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: By integrating data- and community-driven approaches we identified regional health priority areas that if addressed, can have significant impact in the GP IDeA CTR region. The priorities are listed on all GP IDeA-CTR funding announcements to encourage CTR in these areas. Cambridge University Press 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8827908/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.749 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu Estabrooks, Paul Palm, David Navarrette, Sean Keeler, Heidi King, Keyonna Frankel, Emily 91756 A participatory approach to develop regional health priorities for clinical and translational research |
title | 91756 A participatory approach to develop regional health priorities for clinical and translational research |
title_full | 91756 A participatory approach to develop regional health priorities for clinical and translational research |
title_fullStr | 91756 A participatory approach to develop regional health priorities for clinical and translational research |
title_full_unstemmed | 91756 A participatory approach to develop regional health priorities for clinical and translational research |
title_short | 91756 A participatory approach to develop regional health priorities for clinical and translational research |
title_sort | 91756 a participatory approach to develop regional health priorities for clinical and translational research |
topic | Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827908/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.749 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watanabegallowayshinobu 91756aparticipatoryapproachtodevelopregionalhealthprioritiesforclinicalandtranslationalresearch AT estabrookspaul 91756aparticipatoryapproachtodevelopregionalhealthprioritiesforclinicalandtranslationalresearch AT palmdavid 91756aparticipatoryapproachtodevelopregionalhealthprioritiesforclinicalandtranslationalresearch AT navarrettesean 91756aparticipatoryapproachtodevelopregionalhealthprioritiesforclinicalandtranslationalresearch AT keelerheidi 91756aparticipatoryapproachtodevelopregionalhealthprioritiesforclinicalandtranslationalresearch AT kingkeyonna 91756aparticipatoryapproachtodevelopregionalhealthprioritiesforclinicalandtranslationalresearch AT frankelemily 91756aparticipatoryapproachtodevelopregionalhealthprioritiesforclinicalandtranslationalresearch |