Cargando…

27646 Spinal Control Impairments During Two Clinical Tests of Lower Limb Movement in People with and without Low Back Pain

ABSTRACT IMPACT: Our work may be able to impact the examination and clinical decision making of a clinician to identify and target movement impairments to treat people with low back pain. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Test if the magnitude of spinal control impairments is different in two clinical tests of lowe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Stacey, Hooker, Quenten, Lanier, Vanessa, Van Dillen, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827930/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.702
_version_ 1784647748626153472
author Chen, Stacey
Hooker, Quenten
Lanier, Vanessa
Van Dillen, Linda
author_facet Chen, Stacey
Hooker, Quenten
Lanier, Vanessa
Van Dillen, Linda
author_sort Chen, Stacey
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT IMPACT: Our work may be able to impact the examination and clinical decision making of a clinician to identify and target movement impairments to treat people with low back pain. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Test if the magnitude of spinal control impairments is different in two clinical tests of lower limb movement in people with and without low back pain (LBP). The impairment is defined as the time difference between the start of limb to lumbopelvic motion. Also, test if the magnitude of impairments across tests is associated with LBP intensity and function. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 18 controls and 21 people with LBP (51.6% F, 34.5 ±11.5 yrs) participated in a cross-sectional, laboratory-based study. Subjects completed the modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (LBP-related functional limitation measure; 0-100%) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (LBP intensity; average pain prior 7 days; 0-10) self-report surveys and clinical tests of hip medial and lateral rotation performed in prone. A three-dimensional motion capture system was used to capture angular lumbopelvic and hip motion across time. A 2x2 mixed model ANOVA will be used to examine the effects of group, hip rotation test, and group x hip rotation test. Separate bivariate correlations will be used to quantify the association of magnitude of the impairment to (1) average LBP intensity and (2) LBP-related functional limitation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We hypothesize that, compared to healthy controls, people with LBP will display a greater magnitude of impairment across the hip medial and lateral rotation tests. In addition, we hypothesize that the magnitude of the difference in impairment between people with LBP vs controls will be larger during the hip lateral rotation test compared to the hip medial rotation test. Finally, we hypothesize that in people with LBP the magnitude of the impairments across tests will be associated with LBP intensity and LBP-related functional limitation. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: If our hypotheses are supported, the hip rotation tests would further be recognized as a key part of a clinician’s examination and an important target for treatment of LBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8827930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88279302022-02-28 27646 Spinal Control Impairments During Two Clinical Tests of Lower Limb Movement in People with and without Low Back Pain Chen, Stacey Hooker, Quenten Lanier, Vanessa Van Dillen, Linda J Clin Transl Sci Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science ABSTRACT IMPACT: Our work may be able to impact the examination and clinical decision making of a clinician to identify and target movement impairments to treat people with low back pain. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Test if the magnitude of spinal control impairments is different in two clinical tests of lower limb movement in people with and without low back pain (LBP). The impairment is defined as the time difference between the start of limb to lumbopelvic motion. Also, test if the magnitude of impairments across tests is associated with LBP intensity and function. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: 18 controls and 21 people with LBP (51.6% F, 34.5 ±11.5 yrs) participated in a cross-sectional, laboratory-based study. Subjects completed the modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (LBP-related functional limitation measure; 0-100%) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (LBP intensity; average pain prior 7 days; 0-10) self-report surveys and clinical tests of hip medial and lateral rotation performed in prone. A three-dimensional motion capture system was used to capture angular lumbopelvic and hip motion across time. A 2x2 mixed model ANOVA will be used to examine the effects of group, hip rotation test, and group x hip rotation test. Separate bivariate correlations will be used to quantify the association of magnitude of the impairment to (1) average LBP intensity and (2) LBP-related functional limitation. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We hypothesize that, compared to healthy controls, people with LBP will display a greater magnitude of impairment across the hip medial and lateral rotation tests. In addition, we hypothesize that the magnitude of the difference in impairment between people with LBP vs controls will be larger during the hip lateral rotation test compared to the hip medial rotation test. Finally, we hypothesize that in people with LBP the magnitude of the impairments across tests will be associated with LBP intensity and LBP-related functional limitation. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: If our hypotheses are supported, the hip rotation tests would further be recognized as a key part of a clinician’s examination and an important target for treatment of LBP. Cambridge University Press 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8827930/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.702 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science
Chen, Stacey
Hooker, Quenten
Lanier, Vanessa
Van Dillen, Linda
27646 Spinal Control Impairments During Two Clinical Tests of Lower Limb Movement in People with and without Low Back Pain
title 27646 Spinal Control Impairments During Two Clinical Tests of Lower Limb Movement in People with and without Low Back Pain
title_full 27646 Spinal Control Impairments During Two Clinical Tests of Lower Limb Movement in People with and without Low Back Pain
title_fullStr 27646 Spinal Control Impairments During Two Clinical Tests of Lower Limb Movement in People with and without Low Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed 27646 Spinal Control Impairments During Two Clinical Tests of Lower Limb Movement in People with and without Low Back Pain
title_short 27646 Spinal Control Impairments During Two Clinical Tests of Lower Limb Movement in People with and without Low Back Pain
title_sort 27646 spinal control impairments during two clinical tests of lower limb movement in people with and without low back pain
topic Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827930/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.702
work_keys_str_mv AT chenstacey 27646spinalcontrolimpairmentsduringtwoclinicaltestsoflowerlimbmovementinpeoplewithandwithoutlowbackpain
AT hookerquenten 27646spinalcontrolimpairmentsduringtwoclinicaltestsoflowerlimbmovementinpeoplewithandwithoutlowbackpain
AT laniervanessa 27646spinalcontrolimpairmentsduringtwoclinicaltestsoflowerlimbmovementinpeoplewithandwithoutlowbackpain
AT vandillenlinda 27646spinalcontrolimpairmentsduringtwoclinicaltestsoflowerlimbmovementinpeoplewithandwithoutlowbackpain