Cargando…

95347 Examining the Impact of the BPCA: Promoting Pediatric Inclusion in Clinical Trials and Pediatric-Specific Drug Information

ABSTRACT IMPACT: It provides insight in the relationship between pediatrics and clinical research and how pediatric participation in CT translates to clinical significance in form of drug labels, which inform clinicians on how to prescribe pediatric medications. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Assessing the exten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ly, Annie, Church, Terry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827931/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.673
_version_ 1784647748877811712
author Ly, Annie
Church, Terry
author_facet Ly, Annie
Church, Terry
author_sort Ly, Annie
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT IMPACT: It provides insight in the relationship between pediatrics and clinical research and how pediatric participation in CT translates to clinical significance in form of drug labels, which inform clinicians on how to prescribe pediatric medications. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Assessing the extent that the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) advances pediatric inclusion in clinical trials (CTs) and the availability of pediatric-specific drug information METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The BPCA provides the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority to solicit sponsors whose drugs may benefit pediatric populations. Participation is voluntary and provides additional market exclusivity and pediatric information. CTs that received marketing exclusivity from 2016-2018 under BPCA were reviewed using Clinicaltrials.gov to access the legislation’s impact. CTs were categorized according to eligibility: (1) pediatric and adult groups, (2) pediatrics, and (3) pediatric sub-groups. Studies were excluded for ambiguous age data. Studies open to both groups were evaluated for pediatric participation. Each drug was searched in DailyMed.com for published pediatric indications. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Between 2016 - 2018, 22 drugs received marketing exclusivity under BPCA. Of the 196 CTs conducted for these drugs, 135 were available to adults and pediatrics, 10 were available to the entire pediatric population, and 51 were available to specific pediatric sub-populations. Exclusion criteria permitted only 118 of the CTs for assessment where eligibility included both pediatric and adult populations, of which 65 of these had less than 1% pediatric representation. Of the 22 drugs, 20 have pediatric indications. Over this three-year period, the number of CTs where adults and pediatrics were eligible were greater than CTs for pediatric only or pediatric subpopulations. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: It is prevalent for BPCA compliant CTs to include both; 65% of drugs (13/20) with pediatric indications had more studies involving both groups than only pediatrics. Adequate pediatric CT representation is necessary for developing pediatric drug labeling with meaningful data for clinical indications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8827931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88279312022-02-28 95347 Examining the Impact of the BPCA: Promoting Pediatric Inclusion in Clinical Trials and Pediatric-Specific Drug Information Ly, Annie Church, Terry J Clin Transl Sci Regulatory Science ABSTRACT IMPACT: It provides insight in the relationship between pediatrics and clinical research and how pediatric participation in CT translates to clinical significance in form of drug labels, which inform clinicians on how to prescribe pediatric medications. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Assessing the extent that the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) advances pediatric inclusion in clinical trials (CTs) and the availability of pediatric-specific drug information METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The BPCA provides the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority to solicit sponsors whose drugs may benefit pediatric populations. Participation is voluntary and provides additional market exclusivity and pediatric information. CTs that received marketing exclusivity from 2016-2018 under BPCA were reviewed using Clinicaltrials.gov to access the legislation’s impact. CTs were categorized according to eligibility: (1) pediatric and adult groups, (2) pediatrics, and (3) pediatric sub-groups. Studies were excluded for ambiguous age data. Studies open to both groups were evaluated for pediatric participation. Each drug was searched in DailyMed.com for published pediatric indications. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Between 2016 - 2018, 22 drugs received marketing exclusivity under BPCA. Of the 196 CTs conducted for these drugs, 135 were available to adults and pediatrics, 10 were available to the entire pediatric population, and 51 were available to specific pediatric sub-populations. Exclusion criteria permitted only 118 of the CTs for assessment where eligibility included both pediatric and adult populations, of which 65 of these had less than 1% pediatric representation. Of the 22 drugs, 20 have pediatric indications. Over this three-year period, the number of CTs where adults and pediatrics were eligible were greater than CTs for pediatric only or pediatric subpopulations. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: It is prevalent for BPCA compliant CTs to include both; 65% of drugs (13/20) with pediatric indications had more studies involving both groups than only pediatrics. Adequate pediatric CT representation is necessary for developing pediatric drug labeling with meaningful data for clinical indications. Cambridge University Press 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8827931/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.673 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Regulatory Science
Ly, Annie
Church, Terry
95347 Examining the Impact of the BPCA: Promoting Pediatric Inclusion in Clinical Trials and Pediatric-Specific Drug Information
title 95347 Examining the Impact of the BPCA: Promoting Pediatric Inclusion in Clinical Trials and Pediatric-Specific Drug Information
title_full 95347 Examining the Impact of the BPCA: Promoting Pediatric Inclusion in Clinical Trials and Pediatric-Specific Drug Information
title_fullStr 95347 Examining the Impact of the BPCA: Promoting Pediatric Inclusion in Clinical Trials and Pediatric-Specific Drug Information
title_full_unstemmed 95347 Examining the Impact of the BPCA: Promoting Pediatric Inclusion in Clinical Trials and Pediatric-Specific Drug Information
title_short 95347 Examining the Impact of the BPCA: Promoting Pediatric Inclusion in Clinical Trials and Pediatric-Specific Drug Information
title_sort 95347 examining the impact of the bpca: promoting pediatric inclusion in clinical trials and pediatric-specific drug information
topic Regulatory Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827931/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.673
work_keys_str_mv AT lyannie 95347examiningtheimpactofthebpcapromotingpediatricinclusioninclinicaltrialsandpediatricspecificdruginformation
AT churchterry 95347examiningtheimpactofthebpcapromotingpediatricinclusioninclinicaltrialsandpediatricspecificdruginformation