Cargando…

97448 Biopsychosocial Determinants of Pain Assessment and Management - Medical and Surgical Trainees’ Perspective

ABSTRACT IMPACT: Better understanding how clinicians make decisions about pain management, particularly since our prior research has demonstrated that opioids prescribed at discharge is the strongest predictor of opioids taken, is critical to decrease high-risk medication prescribing while preservin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villwock, Jennifer A, Polivka, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827981/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.730
_version_ 1784647761926291456
author Villwock, Jennifer A
Polivka, Barbara
author_facet Villwock, Jennifer A
Polivka, Barbara
author_sort Villwock, Jennifer A
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT IMPACT: Better understanding how clinicians make decisions about pain management, particularly since our prior research has demonstrated that opioids prescribed at discharge is the strongest predictor of opioids taken, is critical to decrease high-risk medication prescribing while preserving high-quality care. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: (1) Identify major biological, psychological, and social determinants of medical and surgical residents’ pain management decisions; (2) Determine salient themes regarding the experience of residents in the management of acute and chronic pain METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Focus groups of internal medicine and general surgery residents at an academic, tertiary care training hospital located in an urban setting were conducted. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all focus groups were conducted virtually and occurred during required didactic sessions to facilitate participation. All interviews were recorded and transcribed. Two reviewers independently reviewed and coded the data following the principles of constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 42 residents participated in ten focus groups ranging in size from two to five individuals. Six themes emerged demonstrating salient BPS factors in pain management decisions: (1) patient and clinician expectations determine what is considered normal/acceptable; (2) inability of pain scales to reliably capture patient pain; (3) desire for more objective methods of pain assessment, while simultaneously recognizing that pain is an inherently subjective experience; (4) difficulty in determine when pain is 'real’ or 'legitimate'; (5) lack of education and protocols regarding pain management; (6) the importance of engaging other services such as acute pain service or nurse educators in complicated situations. Junior residents often expressed doubt in the appropriateness of their approaches and decisions. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Surgical and medical trainees routinely treat pain and may struggle, particularly in the early phases of training, to determine if pain levels are appropriate. There is also a lack of education and/or best practices for assessing and managing pain. These areas represent high-value, clinician-focused targets for future interventions to improve care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8827981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88279812022-02-28 97448 Biopsychosocial Determinants of Pain Assessment and Management - Medical and Surgical Trainees’ Perspective Villwock, Jennifer A Polivka, Barbara J Clin Transl Sci Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science ABSTRACT IMPACT: Better understanding how clinicians make decisions about pain management, particularly since our prior research has demonstrated that opioids prescribed at discharge is the strongest predictor of opioids taken, is critical to decrease high-risk medication prescribing while preserving high-quality care. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: (1) Identify major biological, psychological, and social determinants of medical and surgical residents’ pain management decisions; (2) Determine salient themes regarding the experience of residents in the management of acute and chronic pain METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Focus groups of internal medicine and general surgery residents at an academic, tertiary care training hospital located in an urban setting were conducted. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all focus groups were conducted virtually and occurred during required didactic sessions to facilitate participation. All interviews were recorded and transcribed. Two reviewers independently reviewed and coded the data following the principles of constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: 42 residents participated in ten focus groups ranging in size from two to five individuals. Six themes emerged demonstrating salient BPS factors in pain management decisions: (1) patient and clinician expectations determine what is considered normal/acceptable; (2) inability of pain scales to reliably capture patient pain; (3) desire for more objective methods of pain assessment, while simultaneously recognizing that pain is an inherently subjective experience; (4) difficulty in determine when pain is 'real’ or 'legitimate'; (5) lack of education and protocols regarding pain management; (6) the importance of engaging other services such as acute pain service or nurse educators in complicated situations. Junior residents often expressed doubt in the appropriateness of their approaches and decisions. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Surgical and medical trainees routinely treat pain and may struggle, particularly in the early phases of training, to determine if pain levels are appropriate. There is also a lack of education and/or best practices for assessing and managing pain. These areas represent high-value, clinician-focused targets for future interventions to improve care. Cambridge University Press 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8827981/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.730 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science
Villwock, Jennifer A
Polivka, Barbara
97448 Biopsychosocial Determinants of Pain Assessment and Management - Medical and Surgical Trainees’ Perspective
title 97448 Biopsychosocial Determinants of Pain Assessment and Management - Medical and Surgical Trainees’ Perspective
title_full 97448 Biopsychosocial Determinants of Pain Assessment and Management - Medical and Surgical Trainees’ Perspective
title_fullStr 97448 Biopsychosocial Determinants of Pain Assessment and Management - Medical and Surgical Trainees’ Perspective
title_full_unstemmed 97448 Biopsychosocial Determinants of Pain Assessment and Management - Medical and Surgical Trainees’ Perspective
title_short 97448 Biopsychosocial Determinants of Pain Assessment and Management - Medical and Surgical Trainees’ Perspective
title_sort 97448 biopsychosocial determinants of pain assessment and management - medical and surgical trainees’ perspective
topic Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8827981/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.730
work_keys_str_mv AT villwockjennifera 97448biopsychosocialdeterminantsofpainassessmentandmanagementmedicalandsurgicaltraineesperspective
AT polivkabarbara 97448biopsychosocialdeterminantsofpainassessmentandmanagementmedicalandsurgicaltraineesperspective