Cargando…

64385 Patient Reports of New Diagnosis Compared to Electronic Medical Record Documentation following Emergency Department Visit

ABSTRACT IMPACT: We conducted a study to understand how a patient’s report of a new diagnosis compares with what was documented in the electronic medical record, since it is critical to the diagnostic process that the patient both understands and agrees with a new diagnosis. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We sou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gleason, Kelly, Peterson, Susan, Himmelfarb, Cheryl, Newman-Toker, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828022/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.735
_version_ 1784647772035612672
author Gleason, Kelly
Peterson, Susan
Himmelfarb, Cheryl
Newman-Toker, David
author_facet Gleason, Kelly
Peterson, Susan
Himmelfarb, Cheryl
Newman-Toker, David
author_sort Gleason, Kelly
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT IMPACT: We conducted a study to understand how a patient’s report of a new diagnosis compares with what was documented in the electronic medical record, since it is critical to the diagnostic process that the patient both understands and agrees with a new diagnosis. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We sought feedback on patient’s understanding of their diagnosis and health status follow Emergency Department discharge. We compared patient report of a new diagnosis to documentation in the electronic medical record. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To compare patient reported diagnoses to documented diagnoses, we employed a longitudinal cohort study design at 3 of emergency departments in an academic health system in the Mid-Atlantic. Patients consented to complete questionnaires regarding their understanding of their diagnosis and/or follow-up steps and their health status at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months following emergency department discharge. Inclusion criteria: adult ED patients aged 18 and older seen within the last 7 days with one or more of the following common chief complaints: chest pain, upper back pain, abdominal pain, shortness of breath/cough, dizziness, and headache. We compared patient report of a new diagnosis following discharge to documentation in the electronic medical record. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of the sample recruited (n=137), the majority were women (66%, n=91), the average age was 42 (SD 16). A third (n=45) were black and 56% (n=76) were white. The majority of participants (84%, n=115) reported that they either understood the diagnosis they received on ED discharge, or were not given a diagnosis but they understood follow-up steps. At two weeks following discharge, 25% of participants (n=36) had a new diagnosis identified after discharge and 33% (n=45) reported that their health status stayed the same or worsened. There was 85% agreement (kappa 0.49) between patient report of a new diagnosis and a new diagnosis identified in the electronic medical record. Only one of the participants who reported a new diagnosis also reported seeking healthcare outside of the health system. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Patient report of a new diagnosis following emergency department discharge had moderate agreement with new diagnoses identified in the electronic medical record, and differences in agreement were not explained by outside healthcare visits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8828022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88280222022-03-04 64385 Patient Reports of New Diagnosis Compared to Electronic Medical Record Documentation following Emergency Department Visit Gleason, Kelly Peterson, Susan Himmelfarb, Cheryl Newman-Toker, David J Clin Transl Sci Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science ABSTRACT IMPACT: We conducted a study to understand how a patient’s report of a new diagnosis compares with what was documented in the electronic medical record, since it is critical to the diagnostic process that the patient both understands and agrees with a new diagnosis. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We sought feedback on patient’s understanding of their diagnosis and health status follow Emergency Department discharge. We compared patient report of a new diagnosis to documentation in the electronic medical record. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: To compare patient reported diagnoses to documented diagnoses, we employed a longitudinal cohort study design at 3 of emergency departments in an academic health system in the Mid-Atlantic. Patients consented to complete questionnaires regarding their understanding of their diagnosis and/or follow-up steps and their health status at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months following emergency department discharge. Inclusion criteria: adult ED patients aged 18 and older seen within the last 7 days with one or more of the following common chief complaints: chest pain, upper back pain, abdominal pain, shortness of breath/cough, dizziness, and headache. We compared patient report of a new diagnosis following discharge to documentation in the electronic medical record. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Of the sample recruited (n=137), the majority were women (66%, n=91), the average age was 42 (SD 16). A third (n=45) were black and 56% (n=76) were white. The majority of participants (84%, n=115) reported that they either understood the diagnosis they received on ED discharge, or were not given a diagnosis but they understood follow-up steps. At two weeks following discharge, 25% of participants (n=36) had a new diagnosis identified after discharge and 33% (n=45) reported that their health status stayed the same or worsened. There was 85% agreement (kappa 0.49) between patient report of a new diagnosis and a new diagnosis identified in the electronic medical record. Only one of the participants who reported a new diagnosis also reported seeking healthcare outside of the health system. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Patient report of a new diagnosis following emergency department discharge had moderate agreement with new diagnoses identified in the electronic medical record, and differences in agreement were not explained by outside healthcare visits. Cambridge University Press 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8828022/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.735 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science
Gleason, Kelly
Peterson, Susan
Himmelfarb, Cheryl
Newman-Toker, David
64385 Patient Reports of New Diagnosis Compared to Electronic Medical Record Documentation following Emergency Department Visit
title 64385 Patient Reports of New Diagnosis Compared to Electronic Medical Record Documentation following Emergency Department Visit
title_full 64385 Patient Reports of New Diagnosis Compared to Electronic Medical Record Documentation following Emergency Department Visit
title_fullStr 64385 Patient Reports of New Diagnosis Compared to Electronic Medical Record Documentation following Emergency Department Visit
title_full_unstemmed 64385 Patient Reports of New Diagnosis Compared to Electronic Medical Record Documentation following Emergency Department Visit
title_short 64385 Patient Reports of New Diagnosis Compared to Electronic Medical Record Documentation following Emergency Department Visit
title_sort 64385 patient reports of new diagnosis compared to electronic medical record documentation following emergency department visit
topic Translational Science, Policy, & Health Outcomes Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828022/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.735
work_keys_str_mv AT gleasonkelly 64385patientreportsofnewdiagnosiscomparedtoelectronicmedicalrecorddocumentationfollowingemergencydepartmentvisit
AT petersonsusan 64385patientreportsofnewdiagnosiscomparedtoelectronicmedicalrecorddocumentationfollowingemergencydepartmentvisit
AT himmelfarbcheryl 64385patientreportsofnewdiagnosiscomparedtoelectronicmedicalrecorddocumentationfollowingemergencydepartmentvisit
AT newmantokerdavid 64385patientreportsofnewdiagnosiscomparedtoelectronicmedicalrecorddocumentationfollowingemergencydepartmentvisit