Cargando…
Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation using a stent with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system: Comparison to a conventional procedure with fistula dilation
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS‐CDS) without fistula dilation using a novel self‐expandable metal stent (SEMS). METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients who underwent EUS‐CDS for malignant distal biliary obstru...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35310726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.56 |
_version_ | 1784647787485331456 |
---|---|
author | Koga, Takehiko Hijioka, Susumu Nagashio, Yosikuni Ohba, Akihiro Maruki, Yuta Yoshinari, Motohiro Hisada, Yuya Harai, Shota Kitamura, Hidetoshi Maehara, Kosuke Murashima, Yumi Kawasaki, Yuki Kawahara, Shun Takeshita, Kotaro Yamada, Natsumi Satake, Tomoyuki Kondo, Shunsuke Morizane, Chigusa Ueno, Hideki Okusaka, Takuji Saito, Yutaka |
author_facet | Koga, Takehiko Hijioka, Susumu Nagashio, Yosikuni Ohba, Akihiro Maruki, Yuta Yoshinari, Motohiro Hisada, Yuya Harai, Shota Kitamura, Hidetoshi Maehara, Kosuke Murashima, Yumi Kawasaki, Yuki Kawahara, Shun Takeshita, Kotaro Yamada, Natsumi Satake, Tomoyuki Kondo, Shunsuke Morizane, Chigusa Ueno, Hideki Okusaka, Takuji Saito, Yutaka |
author_sort | Koga, Takehiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS‐CDS) without fistula dilation using a novel self‐expandable metal stent (SEMS). METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients who underwent EUS‐CDS for malignant distal biliary obstruction between October 2017 and May 2021 at the National Cancer Center, Japan. The primary outcome was a technical success without fistula dilation. Secondary outcomes were the overall technical success, clinical success, adverse events (AEs), procedure time, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and time to RBO (TRBO). RESULTS: Forty‐one patients were enrolled; 31 patients underwent EUS‐CDS with fistula dilation using a conventional SEMS with 7.5–8.5‐Fr delivery system (conventional SEMS group), and 10 patients underwent EUS‐CDS without fistula dilation using the novel SEMS with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system (novel SEMS group). In the novel SEMS group, the rate of technical success without fistula dilation was 90%. There were no differences in overall technical success (100% vs. 97%, p = 1.00), clinical success (80% vs. 90%, p = 0.58), and overall AEs (10% vs. 23%, p = 0.65) rates between the novel and conventional SEMS groups. In the novel SEMS group, no early AEs were observed and no bile leakage into the abdominal cavity was observed on the computed tomography scan after the procedure. The median procedure time was significantly shorter in the novel SEMS group (17 min vs. 24 min, p = 0.03). RBO and median TRBO did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: EUS‐CDS without fistula dilation using the novel SEMS with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system is technically feasible, straightforward, quick, and safe. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8828169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88281692022-03-17 Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation using a stent with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system: Comparison to a conventional procedure with fistula dilation Koga, Takehiko Hijioka, Susumu Nagashio, Yosikuni Ohba, Akihiro Maruki, Yuta Yoshinari, Motohiro Hisada, Yuya Harai, Shota Kitamura, Hidetoshi Maehara, Kosuke Murashima, Yumi Kawasaki, Yuki Kawahara, Shun Takeshita, Kotaro Yamada, Natsumi Satake, Tomoyuki Kondo, Shunsuke Morizane, Chigusa Ueno, Hideki Okusaka, Takuji Saito, Yutaka DEN Open Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS‐CDS) without fistula dilation using a novel self‐expandable metal stent (SEMS). METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients who underwent EUS‐CDS for malignant distal biliary obstruction between October 2017 and May 2021 at the National Cancer Center, Japan. The primary outcome was a technical success without fistula dilation. Secondary outcomes were the overall technical success, clinical success, adverse events (AEs), procedure time, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and time to RBO (TRBO). RESULTS: Forty‐one patients were enrolled; 31 patients underwent EUS‐CDS with fistula dilation using a conventional SEMS with 7.5–8.5‐Fr delivery system (conventional SEMS group), and 10 patients underwent EUS‐CDS without fistula dilation using the novel SEMS with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system (novel SEMS group). In the novel SEMS group, the rate of technical success without fistula dilation was 90%. There were no differences in overall technical success (100% vs. 97%, p = 1.00), clinical success (80% vs. 90%, p = 0.58), and overall AEs (10% vs. 23%, p = 0.65) rates between the novel and conventional SEMS groups. In the novel SEMS group, no early AEs were observed and no bile leakage into the abdominal cavity was observed on the computed tomography scan after the procedure. The median procedure time was significantly shorter in the novel SEMS group (17 min vs. 24 min, p = 0.03). RBO and median TRBO did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: EUS‐CDS without fistula dilation using the novel SEMS with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system is technically feasible, straightforward, quick, and safe. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8828169/ /pubmed/35310726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.56 Text en © 2021 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Koga, Takehiko Hijioka, Susumu Nagashio, Yosikuni Ohba, Akihiro Maruki, Yuta Yoshinari, Motohiro Hisada, Yuya Harai, Shota Kitamura, Hidetoshi Maehara, Kosuke Murashima, Yumi Kawasaki, Yuki Kawahara, Shun Takeshita, Kotaro Yamada, Natsumi Satake, Tomoyuki Kondo, Shunsuke Morizane, Chigusa Ueno, Hideki Okusaka, Takuji Saito, Yutaka Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation using a stent with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system: Comparison to a conventional procedure with fistula dilation |
title | Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation using a stent with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system: Comparison to a conventional procedure with fistula dilation |
title_full | Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation using a stent with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system: Comparison to a conventional procedure with fistula dilation |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation using a stent with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system: Comparison to a conventional procedure with fistula dilation |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation using a stent with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system: Comparison to a conventional procedure with fistula dilation |
title_short | Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation using a stent with a 5.9‐Fr delivery system: Comparison to a conventional procedure with fistula dilation |
title_sort | endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy without fistula dilation using a stent with a 5.9‐fr delivery system: comparison to a conventional procedure with fistula dilation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35310726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.56 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kogatakehiko endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT hijiokasusumu endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT nagashioyosikuni endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT ohbaakihiro endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT marukiyuta endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT yoshinarimotohiro endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT hisadayuya endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT haraishota endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT kitamurahidetoshi endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT maeharakosuke endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT murashimayumi endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT kawasakiyuki endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT kawaharashun endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT takeshitakotaro endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT yamadanatsumi endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT sataketomoyuki endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT kondoshunsuke endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT morizanechigusa endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT uenohideki endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT okusakatakuji endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation AT saitoyutaka endoscopicultrasoundguidedcholedochoduodenostomywithoutfistuladilationusingastentwitha59frdeliverysystemcomparisontoaconventionalprocedurewithfistuladilation |