Cargando…
Comparison of scope holding sign on endoscopy and lower esophageal sphincter contraction on high‐resolution manometry: A pilot study
OBJECTIVES: Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) plays a key role in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) pathogenesis. In retroflexion and under sufficient insufflation, it can be seen how the lower esophagus grasps the endoscope, which we named scope holding sign (SHS). This study aimed to compare t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35310738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.50 |
_version_ | 1784647790115160064 |
---|---|
author | Fujiyoshi, Yusuke Inoue, Haruhiro Shimamura, Yuto Fujiyoshi, Mary Raina Angeli Rodriguez de Santiago, Enrique Nishikawa, Yohei Toshimori, Akiko Tanabe, Mayo Sumi, Kazuya Iwaya, Yugo Ono, Masashi Izawa, Shinya Ikeda, Haruo Onimaru, Manabu |
author_facet | Fujiyoshi, Yusuke Inoue, Haruhiro Shimamura, Yuto Fujiyoshi, Mary Raina Angeli Rodriguez de Santiago, Enrique Nishikawa, Yohei Toshimori, Akiko Tanabe, Mayo Sumi, Kazuya Iwaya, Yugo Ono, Masashi Izawa, Shinya Ikeda, Haruo Onimaru, Manabu |
author_sort | Fujiyoshi, Yusuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) plays a key role in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) pathogenesis. In retroflexion and under sufficient insufflation, it can be seen how the lower esophagus grasps the endoscope, which we named scope holding sign (SHS). This study aimed to compare the SHS and LES pressure on high‐resolution manometry (HRM), to elucidate whether the sphincter can be visualized endoscopically. METHODS: This was a single‐center, prospective pilot study. Patients with symptoms of GERD, who underwent endoscopy and HRM between February 2021 and April 2021, were included. A manometry catheter and an ultra‐slim endoscope were inserted, and the resting LES pressure was measured. The lower esophagus holding (SHS‐positive) and releasing (SHS‐negative) the endoscope and catheter were observed. The LES pressures during SHS‐positive and SHS‐negative were compared. RESULTS: Eleven patients (median age: 57 years; eight men) with normal esophageal motility were analyzed. The median LES pressure in SHS‐positive was significantly higher than the resting LES pressure (40.4 [22.9–74.0] vs. 25.9 [2.0–66.7] mm Hg; p = 0.001) and the LES pressure in SHS‐negative (4.6 [1.5–9.3]; p = 0.001). Furthermore, the LES pressure in SHS‐negative was significantly lower than the resting LES pressure (4.6 [1.5–9.3] vs. 25.9 [2.0–66.7] mm Hg; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the SHS parallels LES pressure, indicating that the sphincter can be observed endoscopically. This may enable us to evaluate LES function during endoscopy in patients with GERD, thus, deserving further evaluation in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8828180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88281802022-03-17 Comparison of scope holding sign on endoscopy and lower esophageal sphincter contraction on high‐resolution manometry: A pilot study Fujiyoshi, Yusuke Inoue, Haruhiro Shimamura, Yuto Fujiyoshi, Mary Raina Angeli Rodriguez de Santiago, Enrique Nishikawa, Yohei Toshimori, Akiko Tanabe, Mayo Sumi, Kazuya Iwaya, Yugo Ono, Masashi Izawa, Shinya Ikeda, Haruo Onimaru, Manabu DEN Open Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) plays a key role in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) pathogenesis. In retroflexion and under sufficient insufflation, it can be seen how the lower esophagus grasps the endoscope, which we named scope holding sign (SHS). This study aimed to compare the SHS and LES pressure on high‐resolution manometry (HRM), to elucidate whether the sphincter can be visualized endoscopically. METHODS: This was a single‐center, prospective pilot study. Patients with symptoms of GERD, who underwent endoscopy and HRM between February 2021 and April 2021, were included. A manometry catheter and an ultra‐slim endoscope were inserted, and the resting LES pressure was measured. The lower esophagus holding (SHS‐positive) and releasing (SHS‐negative) the endoscope and catheter were observed. The LES pressures during SHS‐positive and SHS‐negative were compared. RESULTS: Eleven patients (median age: 57 years; eight men) with normal esophageal motility were analyzed. The median LES pressure in SHS‐positive was significantly higher than the resting LES pressure (40.4 [22.9–74.0] vs. 25.9 [2.0–66.7] mm Hg; p = 0.001) and the LES pressure in SHS‐negative (4.6 [1.5–9.3]; p = 0.001). Furthermore, the LES pressure in SHS‐negative was significantly lower than the resting LES pressure (4.6 [1.5–9.3] vs. 25.9 [2.0–66.7] mm Hg; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the SHS parallels LES pressure, indicating that the sphincter can be observed endoscopically. This may enable us to evaluate LES function during endoscopy in patients with GERD, thus, deserving further evaluation in future studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8828180/ /pubmed/35310738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.50 Text en © 2021 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Fujiyoshi, Yusuke Inoue, Haruhiro Shimamura, Yuto Fujiyoshi, Mary Raina Angeli Rodriguez de Santiago, Enrique Nishikawa, Yohei Toshimori, Akiko Tanabe, Mayo Sumi, Kazuya Iwaya, Yugo Ono, Masashi Izawa, Shinya Ikeda, Haruo Onimaru, Manabu Comparison of scope holding sign on endoscopy and lower esophageal sphincter contraction on high‐resolution manometry: A pilot study |
title | Comparison of scope holding sign on endoscopy and lower esophageal sphincter contraction on high‐resolution manometry: A pilot study |
title_full | Comparison of scope holding sign on endoscopy and lower esophageal sphincter contraction on high‐resolution manometry: A pilot study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of scope holding sign on endoscopy and lower esophageal sphincter contraction on high‐resolution manometry: A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of scope holding sign on endoscopy and lower esophageal sphincter contraction on high‐resolution manometry: A pilot study |
title_short | Comparison of scope holding sign on endoscopy and lower esophageal sphincter contraction on high‐resolution manometry: A pilot study |
title_sort | comparison of scope holding sign on endoscopy and lower esophageal sphincter contraction on high‐resolution manometry: a pilot study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35310738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.50 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fujiyoshiyusuke comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT inoueharuhiro comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT shimamurayuto comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT fujiyoshimaryrainaangeli comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT rodriguezdesantiagoenrique comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT nishikawayohei comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT toshimoriakiko comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT tanabemayo comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT sumikazuya comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT iwayayugo comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT onomasashi comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT izawashinya comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT ikedaharuo comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy AT onimarumanabu comparisonofscopeholdingsignonendoscopyandloweresophagealsphinctercontractiononhighresolutionmanometryapilotstudy |