Cargando…
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: Can it be an “Underwater” revolution?
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a newly developed technique for the removal of colorectal, duodenal, esophageal, gastric, ampullary, and small intestinal lesions. We performed a PubMed literature search for articles reporting UEMR outcomes for colorectal polyps. Four randomized con...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35310727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.84 |
_version_ | 1784647802215727104 |
---|---|
author | Takeuchi, Yoji Shichijo, Satoki Uedo, Noriya Ishihara, Ryu |
author_facet | Takeuchi, Yoji Shichijo, Satoki Uedo, Noriya Ishihara, Ryu |
author_sort | Takeuchi, Yoji |
collection | PubMed |
description | Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a newly developed technique for the removal of colorectal, duodenal, esophageal, gastric, ampullary, and small intestinal lesions. We performed a PubMed literature search for articles reporting UEMR outcomes for colorectal polyps. Four randomized controlled trials, nine non‐randomized prospective trials, 16 retrospective studies, and 27 case reports were selected for assessment of the efficacy and safety of UEMR. We summarized the therapeutic outcomes of UEMR in each category according to the lesion characteristics [small size (<10 mm), intermediate size (10–19 mm), large size (≥20 mm), recurrent lesion, and rectal neuroendocrine tumor], and calculated the incidence of adverse events among the included articles. As the treatment outcomes for small polyps appeared similar between UEMR and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR), UEMR can be a standard procedure for small colorectal polyps suspicious for high‐grade dysplasia to avoid incomplete removal of occult invasive cancer by cold snare polypectomy. As UEMR showed satisfactory outcomes for intermediate‐size lesions and recurrent lesions after endoscopic resection, UEMR can be a standard procedure for these lesions. Regarding large lesions and rectal neuroendocrine tumors, comparisons of UEMR with current standard methods for them were lacking, and further investigations are warranted. Adverse events appeared comparable or less frequent for UEMR compared with CEMR but still existed. Therefore, careful implementation of this new technique in clinical practice is important for its widespread use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8828230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88282302022-03-17 Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: Can it be an “Underwater” revolution? Takeuchi, Yoji Shichijo, Satoki Uedo, Noriya Ishihara, Ryu DEN Open Reviews Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a newly developed technique for the removal of colorectal, duodenal, esophageal, gastric, ampullary, and small intestinal lesions. We performed a PubMed literature search for articles reporting UEMR outcomes for colorectal polyps. Four randomized controlled trials, nine non‐randomized prospective trials, 16 retrospective studies, and 27 case reports were selected for assessment of the efficacy and safety of UEMR. We summarized the therapeutic outcomes of UEMR in each category according to the lesion characteristics [small size (<10 mm), intermediate size (10–19 mm), large size (≥20 mm), recurrent lesion, and rectal neuroendocrine tumor], and calculated the incidence of adverse events among the included articles. As the treatment outcomes for small polyps appeared similar between UEMR and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR), UEMR can be a standard procedure for small colorectal polyps suspicious for high‐grade dysplasia to avoid incomplete removal of occult invasive cancer by cold snare polypectomy. As UEMR showed satisfactory outcomes for intermediate‐size lesions and recurrent lesions after endoscopic resection, UEMR can be a standard procedure for these lesions. Regarding large lesions and rectal neuroendocrine tumors, comparisons of UEMR with current standard methods for them were lacking, and further investigations are warranted. Adverse events appeared comparable or less frequent for UEMR compared with CEMR but still existed. Therefore, careful implementation of this new technique in clinical practice is important for its widespread use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8828230/ /pubmed/35310727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.84 Text en © 2022 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Takeuchi, Yoji Shichijo, Satoki Uedo, Noriya Ishihara, Ryu Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: Can it be an “Underwater” revolution? |
title | Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: Can it be an “Underwater” revolution? |
title_full | Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: Can it be an “Underwater” revolution? |
title_fullStr | Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: Can it be an “Underwater” revolution? |
title_full_unstemmed | Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: Can it be an “Underwater” revolution? |
title_short | Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: Can it be an “Underwater” revolution? |
title_sort | underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: can it be an “underwater” revolution? |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35310727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.84 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT takeuchiyoji underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionforcolorectallesionscanitbeanunderwaterrevolution AT shichijosatoki underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionforcolorectallesionscanitbeanunderwaterrevolution AT uedonoriya underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionforcolorectallesionscanitbeanunderwaterrevolution AT ishihararyu underwaterendoscopicmucosalresectionforcolorectallesionscanitbeanunderwaterrevolution |