Cargando…

Evidence-based dosing of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in future trials

BACKGROUND: Two years into the pandemic, convincing evidence in favour of convalescent plasma (ConvP) as a treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still lacking. This contrasts sharply with the efficacy of potent virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. However, resistance of the Omicr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rijnders, Bart J.A., Huygens, Sammy, Mitjà, Oriol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.01.026
_version_ 1784647832595070976
author Rijnders, Bart J.A.
Huygens, Sammy
Mitjà, Oriol
author_facet Rijnders, Bart J.A.
Huygens, Sammy
Mitjà, Oriol
author_sort Rijnders, Bart J.A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two years into the pandemic, convincing evidence in favour of convalescent plasma (ConvP) as a treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still lacking. This contrasts sharply with the efficacy of potent virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. However, resistance of the Omicron variant against almost all licensed monoclonals turns back the clock, and we can expect that ConvP will regain interest. Indeed, the efficacy of virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies supports the premise that ConvP will work when used at the right time, at the right dose, and containing antibodies with the right affinity. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to review available evidence on dosing of ConvP for COVID-19 and provide guidance for future trials or patient care. SOURCES: Because no dose-finding human trials were ever performed, we reviewed COVID-19 animal model studies and human trials that provide (in)direct data on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ConvP. We also discuss the identification of appropriate ConvP donors in the context of emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants. CONTENT: Compared with dosing in animal studies, almost all human trials used substantially lower doses. Identifying donors with sufficiently high virus-neutralizing antibody titres is challenging, in particular when new variants escape immunity induced by ancestral variants. Ways to avoid underdosing are (a) use of ConvP from two different donors, (b) use only ConvP known to neutralize the variant with which the patient is infected, (c) use two ConvP units with a neutralizing antibody titre ≥1/1250 (when only one plasma unit is available, neutralizing antibody titre of ≥1/2500 is recommended), (d) use an antibody test that correlates well with virus neutralization (use of international units per ml (IU/ml) for virus neutralization is strongly encouraged), and (e) use of donors shortly after a third mRNA vaccination may simplify the donor selection process. IMPLICATIONS: In future trials on ConvP for COVID-19, more stringent donor selection criteria and/or higher volume transfusions should be used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8828382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88283822022-02-10 Evidence-based dosing of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in future trials Rijnders, Bart J.A. Huygens, Sammy Mitjà, Oriol Clin Microbiol Infect Narrative Review BACKGROUND: Two years into the pandemic, convincing evidence in favour of convalescent plasma (ConvP) as a treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still lacking. This contrasts sharply with the efficacy of potent virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. However, resistance of the Omicron variant against almost all licensed monoclonals turns back the clock, and we can expect that ConvP will regain interest. Indeed, the efficacy of virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies supports the premise that ConvP will work when used at the right time, at the right dose, and containing antibodies with the right affinity. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to review available evidence on dosing of ConvP for COVID-19 and provide guidance for future trials or patient care. SOURCES: Because no dose-finding human trials were ever performed, we reviewed COVID-19 animal model studies and human trials that provide (in)direct data on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ConvP. We also discuss the identification of appropriate ConvP donors in the context of emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants. CONTENT: Compared with dosing in animal studies, almost all human trials used substantially lower doses. Identifying donors with sufficiently high virus-neutralizing antibody titres is challenging, in particular when new variants escape immunity induced by ancestral variants. Ways to avoid underdosing are (a) use of ConvP from two different donors, (b) use only ConvP known to neutralize the variant with which the patient is infected, (c) use two ConvP units with a neutralizing antibody titre ≥1/1250 (when only one plasma unit is available, neutralizing antibody titre of ≥1/2500 is recommended), (d) use an antibody test that correlates well with virus neutralization (use of international units per ml (IU/ml) for virus neutralization is strongly encouraged), and (e) use of donors shortly after a third mRNA vaccination may simplify the donor selection process. IMPLICATIONS: In future trials on ConvP for COVID-19, more stringent donor selection criteria and/or higher volume transfusions should be used. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2022-05 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8828382/ /pubmed/35150881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.01.026 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Narrative Review
Rijnders, Bart J.A.
Huygens, Sammy
Mitjà, Oriol
Evidence-based dosing of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in future trials
title Evidence-based dosing of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in future trials
title_full Evidence-based dosing of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in future trials
title_fullStr Evidence-based dosing of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in future trials
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based dosing of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in future trials
title_short Evidence-based dosing of convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in future trials
title_sort evidence-based dosing of convalescent plasma for covid-19 in future trials
topic Narrative Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.01.026
work_keys_str_mv AT rijndersbartja evidencebaseddosingofconvalescentplasmaforcovid19infuturetrials
AT huygenssammy evidencebaseddosingofconvalescentplasmaforcovid19infuturetrials
AT mitjaoriol evidencebaseddosingofconvalescentplasmaforcovid19infuturetrials