Cargando…

Current status of delirium assessment tools in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter observational survey

Delirium is a critical challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU) or high care unit (HCU) setting and is associated with poor outcomes. There is not much literature on how many patients in this setting are assessed for delirium and what tools are used. This study investigated the status of delirium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ishii, Kenzo, Kuroda, Kosuke, Tokura, Chika, Michida, Masaaki, Sugimoto, Kentaro, Sato, Tetsufumi, Ishikawa, Tomoki, Hagioka, Shingo, Manabe, Nobuki, Kurasako, Toshiaki, Goto, Takashi, Kimura, Masakazu, Sunami, Kazuharu, Inoue, Kazuyoshi, Tsukiji, Takashi, Yasukawa, Takeshi, Nogami, Satoshi, Tsukioki, Mitsunori, Okabe, Daisuke, Tanino, Masaaki, Morimatsu, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06106-w
_version_ 1784647927013048320
author Ishii, Kenzo
Kuroda, Kosuke
Tokura, Chika
Michida, Masaaki
Sugimoto, Kentaro
Sato, Tetsufumi
Ishikawa, Tomoki
Hagioka, Shingo
Manabe, Nobuki
Kurasako, Toshiaki
Goto, Takashi
Kimura, Masakazu
Sunami, Kazuharu
Inoue, Kazuyoshi
Tsukiji, Takashi
Yasukawa, Takeshi
Nogami, Satoshi
Tsukioki, Mitsunori
Okabe, Daisuke
Tanino, Masaaki
Morimatsu, Hiroshi
author_facet Ishii, Kenzo
Kuroda, Kosuke
Tokura, Chika
Michida, Masaaki
Sugimoto, Kentaro
Sato, Tetsufumi
Ishikawa, Tomoki
Hagioka, Shingo
Manabe, Nobuki
Kurasako, Toshiaki
Goto, Takashi
Kimura, Masakazu
Sunami, Kazuharu
Inoue, Kazuyoshi
Tsukiji, Takashi
Yasukawa, Takeshi
Nogami, Satoshi
Tsukioki, Mitsunori
Okabe, Daisuke
Tanino, Masaaki
Morimatsu, Hiroshi
author_sort Ishii, Kenzo
collection PubMed
description Delirium is a critical challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU) or high care unit (HCU) setting and is associated with poor outcomes. There is not much literature on how many patients in this setting are assessed for delirium and what tools are used. This study investigated the status of delirium assessment tools of patients in the ICU/HCU. We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study among 20 institutions. Data for patients who were admitted to and discharged from the ICU/HCU during a 1-month study period were collected from each institution using a survey sheet. The primary outcome was the usage rate of delirium assessment tools on an institution- and patient-basis. Secondary outcomes were the delirium prevalence assessed by each institution’s assessment tool, comparison of delirium prevalence between delirium assessment tools, delirium prevalence at the end of ICH/HCU stay, and the relationship between potential factors related to delirium and the development of delirium. Result showed that 95% of institutions used the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) or the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) to assess delirium in their ICU/HCU, and the remaining one used another assessment scale. The usage rate (at least once during the ICU/HCU stay) of the ICDSC and the CAM-ICU among individual patients were 64.5% and 25.1%, and only 8.2% of enrolled patients were not assessed by any delirium assessment tool. The prevalence of delirium during ICU/HCU stay was 17.9%, and the prevalence of delirium at the end of the ICU/HCU stay was 5.9%. In conclusion, all institutions used delirium assessment tools in the ICU/HCU, and most patients received delirium assessment. The prevalence of delirium was 17.9%, and two-thirds of patients had recovered at discharge from ICU/HCU. Trial registration number: UMIN000037834.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8828828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88288282022-02-10 Current status of delirium assessment tools in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter observational survey Ishii, Kenzo Kuroda, Kosuke Tokura, Chika Michida, Masaaki Sugimoto, Kentaro Sato, Tetsufumi Ishikawa, Tomoki Hagioka, Shingo Manabe, Nobuki Kurasako, Toshiaki Goto, Takashi Kimura, Masakazu Sunami, Kazuharu Inoue, Kazuyoshi Tsukiji, Takashi Yasukawa, Takeshi Nogami, Satoshi Tsukioki, Mitsunori Okabe, Daisuke Tanino, Masaaki Morimatsu, Hiroshi Sci Rep Article Delirium is a critical challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU) or high care unit (HCU) setting and is associated with poor outcomes. There is not much literature on how many patients in this setting are assessed for delirium and what tools are used. This study investigated the status of delirium assessment tools of patients in the ICU/HCU. We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study among 20 institutions. Data for patients who were admitted to and discharged from the ICU/HCU during a 1-month study period were collected from each institution using a survey sheet. The primary outcome was the usage rate of delirium assessment tools on an institution- and patient-basis. Secondary outcomes were the delirium prevalence assessed by each institution’s assessment tool, comparison of delirium prevalence between delirium assessment tools, delirium prevalence at the end of ICH/HCU stay, and the relationship between potential factors related to delirium and the development of delirium. Result showed that 95% of institutions used the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) or the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) to assess delirium in their ICU/HCU, and the remaining one used another assessment scale. The usage rate (at least once during the ICU/HCU stay) of the ICDSC and the CAM-ICU among individual patients were 64.5% and 25.1%, and only 8.2% of enrolled patients were not assessed by any delirium assessment tool. The prevalence of delirium during ICU/HCU stay was 17.9%, and the prevalence of delirium at the end of the ICU/HCU stay was 5.9%. In conclusion, all institutions used delirium assessment tools in the ICU/HCU, and most patients received delirium assessment. The prevalence of delirium was 17.9%, and two-thirds of patients had recovered at discharge from ICU/HCU. Trial registration number: UMIN000037834. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8828828/ /pubmed/35140285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06106-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ishii, Kenzo
Kuroda, Kosuke
Tokura, Chika
Michida, Masaaki
Sugimoto, Kentaro
Sato, Tetsufumi
Ishikawa, Tomoki
Hagioka, Shingo
Manabe, Nobuki
Kurasako, Toshiaki
Goto, Takashi
Kimura, Masakazu
Sunami, Kazuharu
Inoue, Kazuyoshi
Tsukiji, Takashi
Yasukawa, Takeshi
Nogami, Satoshi
Tsukioki, Mitsunori
Okabe, Daisuke
Tanino, Masaaki
Morimatsu, Hiroshi
Current status of delirium assessment tools in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter observational survey
title Current status of delirium assessment tools in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter observational survey
title_full Current status of delirium assessment tools in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter observational survey
title_fullStr Current status of delirium assessment tools in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter observational survey
title_full_unstemmed Current status of delirium assessment tools in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter observational survey
title_short Current status of delirium assessment tools in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter observational survey
title_sort current status of delirium assessment tools in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter observational survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06106-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ishiikenzo currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT kurodakosuke currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT tokurachika currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT michidamasaaki currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT sugimotokentaro currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT satotetsufumi currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT ishikawatomoki currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT hagiokashingo currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT manabenobuki currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT kurasakotoshiaki currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT gototakashi currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT kimuramasakazu currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT sunamikazuharu currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT inouekazuyoshi currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT tsukijitakashi currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT yasukawatakeshi currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT nogamisatoshi currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT tsukiokimitsunori currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT okabedaisuke currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT taninomasaaki currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey
AT morimatsuhiroshi currentstatusofdeliriumassessmenttoolsintheintensivecareunitaprospectivemulticenterobservationalsurvey