Cargando…

Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials

OBJECTIVE: Large stimulus and myogenic artifacts usually prevent detection of sensory evoked potentials to electrical stimulation in trigeminal sensory territory (t-SEP). Stimulus Artifact (SA) removal can be obtained by means of two stimulating modes (Dual Mode Stimulation - DMS) having in common a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Troni, Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.01.001
_version_ 1784647959529390080
author Troni, Walter
author_facet Troni, Walter
author_sort Troni, Walter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Large stimulus and myogenic artifacts usually prevent detection of sensory evoked potentials to electrical stimulation in trigeminal sensory territory (t-SEP). Stimulus Artifact (SA) removal can be obtained by means of two stimulating modes (Dual Mode Stimulation - DMS) having in common a fixed cathode alternatingly referred to opposed anodes, resulting in SAs of opposite polarity. Opposite SAs progressively cancel each other out during averaging, without interaction with the underlying bio-electrical events. METHODS: Using DMS, dermatomal t-SEP were recorded from C5/C6 scalp sites in 24 healthy volunteers after selective, electrical stimulation of five trigeminal nerve areas: supraorbital, infraorbital, superior alveolar, inferior alveolar and auriculotemporal. RESULTS: Reproducible t-SEPs were obtained after stimulation at all sites and showed the classical W shape, without significant differences related to the stimulated area. Cortical responses were formed by a sequence of individual peaks labelled, according to polarity and mean latency, as P8, N13, P19, N27, P38. A later, less stable component followed (N55-P67), poorly defined or absent in about one third of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique represents a novel approach, within reach of any neurophysiological unit, to record dermatomal SEPs to electrical stimulation of several, discrete areas of significant clinical interest, covering the whole trigeminal sensory territory. SIGNIFICANCE: DMS represents a simple and robust tool to remove SA as the main drawback that has so far prevented recording of t-SEPs in daily clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8828960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88289602022-02-14 Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials Troni, Walter Clin Neurophysiol Pract Research Paper OBJECTIVE: Large stimulus and myogenic artifacts usually prevent detection of sensory evoked potentials to electrical stimulation in trigeminal sensory territory (t-SEP). Stimulus Artifact (SA) removal can be obtained by means of two stimulating modes (Dual Mode Stimulation - DMS) having in common a fixed cathode alternatingly referred to opposed anodes, resulting in SAs of opposite polarity. Opposite SAs progressively cancel each other out during averaging, without interaction with the underlying bio-electrical events. METHODS: Using DMS, dermatomal t-SEP were recorded from C5/C6 scalp sites in 24 healthy volunteers after selective, electrical stimulation of five trigeminal nerve areas: supraorbital, infraorbital, superior alveolar, inferior alveolar and auriculotemporal. RESULTS: Reproducible t-SEPs were obtained after stimulation at all sites and showed the classical W shape, without significant differences related to the stimulated area. Cortical responses were formed by a sequence of individual peaks labelled, according to polarity and mean latency, as P8, N13, P19, N27, P38. A later, less stable component followed (N55-P67), poorly defined or absent in about one third of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique represents a novel approach, within reach of any neurophysiological unit, to record dermatomal SEPs to electrical stimulation of several, discrete areas of significant clinical interest, covering the whole trigeminal sensory territory. SIGNIFICANCE: DMS represents a simple and robust tool to remove SA as the main drawback that has so far prevented recording of t-SEPs in daily clinical practice. Elsevier 2022-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8828960/ /pubmed/35169660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.01.001 Text en © 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Troni, Walter
Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials
title Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials
title_full Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials
title_fullStr Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials
title_full_unstemmed Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials
title_short Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials
title_sort stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT troniwalter stimulusartifactremovaltodetecttrigeminalsensoryevokedpotentials