Cargando…
Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials
OBJECTIVE: Large stimulus and myogenic artifacts usually prevent detection of sensory evoked potentials to electrical stimulation in trigeminal sensory territory (t-SEP). Stimulus Artifact (SA) removal can be obtained by means of two stimulating modes (Dual Mode Stimulation - DMS) having in common a...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.01.001 |
_version_ | 1784647959529390080 |
---|---|
author | Troni, Walter |
author_facet | Troni, Walter |
author_sort | Troni, Walter |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Large stimulus and myogenic artifacts usually prevent detection of sensory evoked potentials to electrical stimulation in trigeminal sensory territory (t-SEP). Stimulus Artifact (SA) removal can be obtained by means of two stimulating modes (Dual Mode Stimulation - DMS) having in common a fixed cathode alternatingly referred to opposed anodes, resulting in SAs of opposite polarity. Opposite SAs progressively cancel each other out during averaging, without interaction with the underlying bio-electrical events. METHODS: Using DMS, dermatomal t-SEP were recorded from C5/C6 scalp sites in 24 healthy volunteers after selective, electrical stimulation of five trigeminal nerve areas: supraorbital, infraorbital, superior alveolar, inferior alveolar and auriculotemporal. RESULTS: Reproducible t-SEPs were obtained after stimulation at all sites and showed the classical W shape, without significant differences related to the stimulated area. Cortical responses were formed by a sequence of individual peaks labelled, according to polarity and mean latency, as P8, N13, P19, N27, P38. A later, less stable component followed (N55-P67), poorly defined or absent in about one third of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique represents a novel approach, within reach of any neurophysiological unit, to record dermatomal SEPs to electrical stimulation of several, discrete areas of significant clinical interest, covering the whole trigeminal sensory territory. SIGNIFICANCE: DMS represents a simple and robust tool to remove SA as the main drawback that has so far prevented recording of t-SEPs in daily clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8828960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88289602022-02-14 Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials Troni, Walter Clin Neurophysiol Pract Research Paper OBJECTIVE: Large stimulus and myogenic artifacts usually prevent detection of sensory evoked potentials to electrical stimulation in trigeminal sensory territory (t-SEP). Stimulus Artifact (SA) removal can be obtained by means of two stimulating modes (Dual Mode Stimulation - DMS) having in common a fixed cathode alternatingly referred to opposed anodes, resulting in SAs of opposite polarity. Opposite SAs progressively cancel each other out during averaging, without interaction with the underlying bio-electrical events. METHODS: Using DMS, dermatomal t-SEP were recorded from C5/C6 scalp sites in 24 healthy volunteers after selective, electrical stimulation of five trigeminal nerve areas: supraorbital, infraorbital, superior alveolar, inferior alveolar and auriculotemporal. RESULTS: Reproducible t-SEPs were obtained after stimulation at all sites and showed the classical W shape, without significant differences related to the stimulated area. Cortical responses were formed by a sequence of individual peaks labelled, according to polarity and mean latency, as P8, N13, P19, N27, P38. A later, less stable component followed (N55-P67), poorly defined or absent in about one third of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique represents a novel approach, within reach of any neurophysiological unit, to record dermatomal SEPs to electrical stimulation of several, discrete areas of significant clinical interest, covering the whole trigeminal sensory territory. SIGNIFICANCE: DMS represents a simple and robust tool to remove SA as the main drawback that has so far prevented recording of t-SEPs in daily clinical practice. Elsevier 2022-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8828960/ /pubmed/35169660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.01.001 Text en © 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Troni, Walter Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials |
title | Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials |
title_full | Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials |
title_fullStr | Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials |
title_full_unstemmed | Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials |
title_short | Stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials |
title_sort | stimulus artifact removal to detect trigeminal sensory evoked potentials |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8828960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.01.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT troniwalter stimulusartifactremovaltodetecttrigeminalsensoryevokedpotentials |