Cargando…
Smart Assistive Technology for Cooking for People With Cognitive Impairments Following a Traumatic Brain Injury: User Experience Study
BACKGROUND: User experience (UX), including usability, should be formally assessed multiple times throughout the development process to optimize the acceptability and integration of a new technology before implementing it within the home environment of people living with cognitive impairments. OBJEC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35080496 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28701 |
_version_ | 1784648126613684224 |
---|---|
author | Gagnon-Roy, Mireille Pinard, Stéphanie Bottari, Carolina Le Morellec, Fanny Laliberté, Catherine Ben Lagha, Rym Yaddaden, Amel Pigot, Hélène Giroux, Sylvain Bier, Nathalie |
author_facet | Gagnon-Roy, Mireille Pinard, Stéphanie Bottari, Carolina Le Morellec, Fanny Laliberté, Catherine Ben Lagha, Rym Yaddaden, Amel Pigot, Hélène Giroux, Sylvain Bier, Nathalie |
author_sort | Gagnon-Roy, Mireille |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: User experience (UX), including usability, should be formally assessed multiple times throughout the development process to optimize the acceptability and integration of a new technology before implementing it within the home environment of people living with cognitive impairments. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify UX issues, notably usability issues, and factors to consider for the future implementation of the COOK (Cognitive Orthosis for Cooking) within the home of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) to identify modifications to improve the technology. METHODS: This study comprised two rounds of UX evaluations, including extensive usability testing, which were completed in a laboratory context: 3 sessions with 5 experts and, after improvement of COOK, 2 sessions with 10 participants with TBI. Each session included the use of scenarios and questionnaires on UX and usability. RESULTS: Both rounds demonstrated good usability outcomes and hedonic qualities. Various usability issues were identified by participants, such as navigation inconsistencies, technical bugs, and the need for more feedback. Factors to consider in the future implementation of COOK were also mentioned by participants with TBI, including environmental (eg, space available and presence of pets) and personal factors (eg, level of comfort with technology, presence of visual deficits, and preferences). CONCLUSIONS: By evaluating UX, including usability, various times throughout the development process and including experts and end users, our research team was able to develop a technology that was perceived as usable, pleasant, and well-designed. This research is an example of how and when people with cognitive impairments (ie, people with TBI) can be involved in evaluating the UX of new technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8829699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88296992022-02-11 Smart Assistive Technology for Cooking for People With Cognitive Impairments Following a Traumatic Brain Injury: User Experience Study Gagnon-Roy, Mireille Pinard, Stéphanie Bottari, Carolina Le Morellec, Fanny Laliberté, Catherine Ben Lagha, Rym Yaddaden, Amel Pigot, Hélène Giroux, Sylvain Bier, Nathalie JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol Original Paper BACKGROUND: User experience (UX), including usability, should be formally assessed multiple times throughout the development process to optimize the acceptability and integration of a new technology before implementing it within the home environment of people living with cognitive impairments. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify UX issues, notably usability issues, and factors to consider for the future implementation of the COOK (Cognitive Orthosis for Cooking) within the home of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) to identify modifications to improve the technology. METHODS: This study comprised two rounds of UX evaluations, including extensive usability testing, which were completed in a laboratory context: 3 sessions with 5 experts and, after improvement of COOK, 2 sessions with 10 participants with TBI. Each session included the use of scenarios and questionnaires on UX and usability. RESULTS: Both rounds demonstrated good usability outcomes and hedonic qualities. Various usability issues were identified by participants, such as navigation inconsistencies, technical bugs, and the need for more feedback. Factors to consider in the future implementation of COOK were also mentioned by participants with TBI, including environmental (eg, space available and presence of pets) and personal factors (eg, level of comfort with technology, presence of visual deficits, and preferences). CONCLUSIONS: By evaluating UX, including usability, various times throughout the development process and including experts and end users, our research team was able to develop a technology that was perceived as usable, pleasant, and well-designed. This research is an example of how and when people with cognitive impairments (ie, people with TBI) can be involved in evaluating the UX of new technology. JMIR Publications 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8829699/ /pubmed/35080496 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28701 Text en ©Mireille Gagnon-Roy, Stéphanie Pinard, Carolina Bottari, Fanny Le Morellec, Catherine Laliberté, Rym Ben Lagha, Amel Yaddaden, Hélène Pigot, Sylvain Giroux, Nathalie Bier. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 26.01.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Gagnon-Roy, Mireille Pinard, Stéphanie Bottari, Carolina Le Morellec, Fanny Laliberté, Catherine Ben Lagha, Rym Yaddaden, Amel Pigot, Hélène Giroux, Sylvain Bier, Nathalie Smart Assistive Technology for Cooking for People With Cognitive Impairments Following a Traumatic Brain Injury: User Experience Study |
title | Smart Assistive Technology for Cooking for People With Cognitive Impairments Following a Traumatic Brain Injury: User Experience Study |
title_full | Smart Assistive Technology for Cooking for People With Cognitive Impairments Following a Traumatic Brain Injury: User Experience Study |
title_fullStr | Smart Assistive Technology for Cooking for People With Cognitive Impairments Following a Traumatic Brain Injury: User Experience Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Smart Assistive Technology for Cooking for People With Cognitive Impairments Following a Traumatic Brain Injury: User Experience Study |
title_short | Smart Assistive Technology for Cooking for People With Cognitive Impairments Following a Traumatic Brain Injury: User Experience Study |
title_sort | smart assistive technology for cooking for people with cognitive impairments following a traumatic brain injury: user experience study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35080496 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gagnonroymireille smartassistivetechnologyforcookingforpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentsfollowingatraumaticbraininjuryuserexperiencestudy AT pinardstephanie smartassistivetechnologyforcookingforpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentsfollowingatraumaticbraininjuryuserexperiencestudy AT bottaricarolina smartassistivetechnologyforcookingforpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentsfollowingatraumaticbraininjuryuserexperiencestudy AT lemorellecfanny smartassistivetechnologyforcookingforpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentsfollowingatraumaticbraininjuryuserexperiencestudy AT lalibertecatherine smartassistivetechnologyforcookingforpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentsfollowingatraumaticbraininjuryuserexperiencestudy AT benlagharym smartassistivetechnologyforcookingforpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentsfollowingatraumaticbraininjuryuserexperiencestudy AT yaddadenamel smartassistivetechnologyforcookingforpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentsfollowingatraumaticbraininjuryuserexperiencestudy AT pigothelene smartassistivetechnologyforcookingforpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentsfollowingatraumaticbraininjuryuserexperiencestudy AT girouxsylvain smartassistivetechnologyforcookingforpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentsfollowingatraumaticbraininjuryuserexperiencestudy AT biernathalie smartassistivetechnologyforcookingforpeoplewithcognitiveimpairmentsfollowingatraumaticbraininjuryuserexperiencestudy |