Cargando…
Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: Review the safety of fertility preservation through ovarian stimulation with oocyte or embryo cryopreservation, including cycle and medication options. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review of peer-reviewed sources revealed 2 applicable randomized control trials and 60 cohort studies as we...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17455065221074886 |
_version_ | 1784648129860075520 |
---|---|
author | Ozcan, Meghan CH Snegovskikh, Victoria Adamson, G David |
author_facet | Ozcan, Meghan CH Snegovskikh, Victoria Adamson, G David |
author_sort | Ozcan, Meghan CH |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Review the safety of fertility preservation through ovarian stimulation with oocyte or embryo cryopreservation, including cycle and medication options. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review of peer-reviewed sources revealed 2 applicable randomized control trials and 60 cohort studies as well as 20 additional expert opinions or reviews. RESULTS: The capacity for future family building is important for the majority of reproductive age people, despite life-altering medical or oncologic diagnosis. Modern fertility preservation generates a high rate of oocyte yield while utilizing protocols that can be started at multiple points in the menstrual cycle and suppressing supra-physiologic levels of estrogen. Finally, more than one quarter of fertility preservation patients will return to later utilize fertility services. CONCLUSION: For most patients, fertility preservation can safely be pursued and completed within 2 weeks without affecting disease severity or long-term survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8829712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88297122022-02-11 Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review Ozcan, Meghan CH Snegovskikh, Victoria Adamson, G David Womens Health (Lond) Onco-fertility: bridging the gap between cancer and reproductive health OBJECTIVE: Review the safety of fertility preservation through ovarian stimulation with oocyte or embryo cryopreservation, including cycle and medication options. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic review of peer-reviewed sources revealed 2 applicable randomized control trials and 60 cohort studies as well as 20 additional expert opinions or reviews. RESULTS: The capacity for future family building is important for the majority of reproductive age people, despite life-altering medical or oncologic diagnosis. Modern fertility preservation generates a high rate of oocyte yield while utilizing protocols that can be started at multiple points in the menstrual cycle and suppressing supra-physiologic levels of estrogen. Finally, more than one quarter of fertility preservation patients will return to later utilize fertility services. CONCLUSION: For most patients, fertility preservation can safely be pursued and completed within 2 weeks without affecting disease severity or long-term survival. SAGE Publications 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8829712/ /pubmed/35130799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17455065221074886 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Onco-fertility: bridging the gap between cancer and reproductive health Ozcan, Meghan CH Snegovskikh, Victoria Adamson, G David Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review |
title | Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review |
title_full | Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review |
title_short | Oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: Principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review |
title_sort | oocyte and embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatments: principles of safe ovarian stimulation, a systematic review |
topic | Onco-fertility: bridging the gap between cancer and reproductive health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17455065221074886 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozcanmeghanch oocyteandembryocryopreservationbeforegonadotoxictreatmentsprinciplesofsafeovarianstimulationasystematicreview AT snegovskikhvictoria oocyteandembryocryopreservationbeforegonadotoxictreatmentsprinciplesofsafeovarianstimulationasystematicreview AT adamsongdavid oocyteandembryocryopreservationbeforegonadotoxictreatmentsprinciplesofsafeovarianstimulationasystematicreview |