Cargando…
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is currently recommended for patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, recent studies have yielded controversial results. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS. METHODS: Three electronic databases we...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155618 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.818215 |
_version_ | 1784648131309207552 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Mengyi Cui, Weichen Li, Linping |
author_facet | Sun, Mengyi Cui, Weichen Li, Linping |
author_sort | Sun, Mengyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is currently recommended for patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, recent studies have yielded controversial results. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS. METHODS: Three electronic databases were queried until April 25, 2021. We defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) as the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary efficacy endpoints included stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and myocardial infarction. The safety endpoints were (major and minor) bleeding. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to represent the estimated effect sizes. RESULTS: A total of 270,937 patients with ACS from 10 clinical trials and 18 observational studies were included. No significant difference was detected in MACE (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60–1.08, p = 0.15, I(2) = 64.83%). However, ticagrelor introduced a higher risk of bleeding (1.46, 1.17–1.83, 0.00, 61.66%) and minor bleeding (1.71, 1.33–2.21, 0.00, 4.65%) in clinical trials. The results of secondary efficacy endpoints differed in the clinical trials and observational studies. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor showed better therapeutic effects in patients who underwent the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (0.38, 0.23–0.63, 0.00, 0) than those intended for PCI (1.03, 0.76–1.38, 0.87, 64.26%). Meanwhile, ticagrelor showed different therapeutic effects on patients with ACS of different ethnicities and different countries. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor is not superior to clopidogrel in MACE but is associated with a higher risk of bleeding in patients with ACS. Different PCI strategies, ethnicities, and countries may be the factors that contribute to different therapeutic effects of ticagrelor. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021251212). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8829718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88297182022-02-11 Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Sun, Mengyi Cui, Weichen Li, Linping Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is currently recommended for patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, recent studies have yielded controversial results. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS. METHODS: Three electronic databases were queried until April 25, 2021. We defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) as the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary efficacy endpoints included stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and myocardial infarction. The safety endpoints were (major and minor) bleeding. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to represent the estimated effect sizes. RESULTS: A total of 270,937 patients with ACS from 10 clinical trials and 18 observational studies were included. No significant difference was detected in MACE (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60–1.08, p = 0.15, I(2) = 64.83%). However, ticagrelor introduced a higher risk of bleeding (1.46, 1.17–1.83, 0.00, 61.66%) and minor bleeding (1.71, 1.33–2.21, 0.00, 4.65%) in clinical trials. The results of secondary efficacy endpoints differed in the clinical trials and observational studies. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor showed better therapeutic effects in patients who underwent the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (0.38, 0.23–0.63, 0.00, 0) than those intended for PCI (1.03, 0.76–1.38, 0.87, 64.26%). Meanwhile, ticagrelor showed different therapeutic effects on patients with ACS of different ethnicities and different countries. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor is not superior to clopidogrel in MACE but is associated with a higher risk of bleeding in patients with ACS. Different PCI strategies, ethnicities, and countries may be the factors that contribute to different therapeutic effects of ticagrelor. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021251212). Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8829718/ /pubmed/35155618 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.818215 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Cui and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Sun, Mengyi Cui, Weichen Li, Linping Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome: a comprehensive meta-analysis |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155618 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.818215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunmengyi comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenticagrelorandclopidogrelinacutecoronarysyndromeacomprehensivemetaanalysis AT cuiweichen comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenticagrelorandclopidogrelinacutecoronarysyndromeacomprehensivemetaanalysis AT lilinping comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenticagrelorandclopidogrelinacutecoronarysyndromeacomprehensivemetaanalysis |