Cargando…

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is currently recommended for patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, recent studies have yielded controversial results. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS. METHODS: Three electronic databases we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Mengyi, Cui, Weichen, Li, Linping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155618
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.818215
_version_ 1784648131309207552
author Sun, Mengyi
Cui, Weichen
Li, Linping
author_facet Sun, Mengyi
Cui, Weichen
Li, Linping
author_sort Sun, Mengyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is currently recommended for patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, recent studies have yielded controversial results. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS. METHODS: Three electronic databases were queried until April 25, 2021. We defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) as the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary efficacy endpoints included stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and myocardial infarction. The safety endpoints were (major and minor) bleeding. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to represent the estimated effect sizes. RESULTS: A total of 270,937 patients with ACS from 10 clinical trials and 18 observational studies were included. No significant difference was detected in MACE (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60–1.08, p = 0.15, I(2) = 64.83%). However, ticagrelor introduced a higher risk of bleeding (1.46, 1.17–1.83, 0.00, 61.66%) and minor bleeding (1.71, 1.33–2.21, 0.00, 4.65%) in clinical trials. The results of secondary efficacy endpoints differed in the clinical trials and observational studies. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor showed better therapeutic effects in patients who underwent the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (0.38, 0.23–0.63, 0.00, 0) than those intended for PCI (1.03, 0.76–1.38, 0.87, 64.26%). Meanwhile, ticagrelor showed different therapeutic effects on patients with ACS of different ethnicities and different countries. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor is not superior to clopidogrel in MACE but is associated with a higher risk of bleeding in patients with ACS. Different PCI strategies, ethnicities, and countries may be the factors that contribute to different therapeutic effects of ticagrelor. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021251212).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8829718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88297182022-02-11 Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Sun, Mengyi Cui, Weichen Li, Linping Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is currently recommended for patients with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, recent studies have yielded controversial results. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with ACS. METHODS: Three electronic databases were queried until April 25, 2021. We defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) as the primary efficacy endpoint. The secondary efficacy endpoints included stroke, stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and myocardial infarction. The safety endpoints were (major and minor) bleeding. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to represent the estimated effect sizes. RESULTS: A total of 270,937 patients with ACS from 10 clinical trials and 18 observational studies were included. No significant difference was detected in MACE (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60–1.08, p = 0.15, I(2) = 64.83%). However, ticagrelor introduced a higher risk of bleeding (1.46, 1.17–1.83, 0.00, 61.66%) and minor bleeding (1.71, 1.33–2.21, 0.00, 4.65%) in clinical trials. The results of secondary efficacy endpoints differed in the clinical trials and observational studies. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor showed better therapeutic effects in patients who underwent the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (0.38, 0.23–0.63, 0.00, 0) than those intended for PCI (1.03, 0.76–1.38, 0.87, 64.26%). Meanwhile, ticagrelor showed different therapeutic effects on patients with ACS of different ethnicities and different countries. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that ticagrelor is not superior to clopidogrel in MACE but is associated with a higher risk of bleeding in patients with ACS. Different PCI strategies, ethnicities, and countries may be the factors that contribute to different therapeutic effects of ticagrelor. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021251212). Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8829718/ /pubmed/35155618 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.818215 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Cui and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Sun, Mengyi
Cui, Weichen
Li, Linping
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome: a comprehensive meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155618
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.818215
work_keys_str_mv AT sunmengyi comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenticagrelorandclopidogrelinacutecoronarysyndromeacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT cuiweichen comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenticagrelorandclopidogrelinacutecoronarysyndromeacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT lilinping comparisonofclinicaloutcomesbetweenticagrelorandclopidogrelinacutecoronarysyndromeacomprehensivemetaanalysis