Cargando…

Prophylactic Antibiotic Practices in Common Otologic Surgeries in Iran

INTRODUCTION: Rational surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is suggested for some selected surgical processes. However, inappropriate utilization of antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces benefits and increases costs and risks, such as antibiotic resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the current practice o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faramarzi, Mohammad, Faramarzi, Ali, Roosta, Sareh, Rabiei, Nikta, Faramarzi, Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223655
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2021.56803.2959
_version_ 1784648142340227072
author Faramarzi, Mohammad
Faramarzi, Ali
Roosta, Sareh
Rabiei, Nikta
Faramarzi, Hossein
author_facet Faramarzi, Mohammad
Faramarzi, Ali
Roosta, Sareh
Rabiei, Nikta
Faramarzi, Hossein
author_sort Faramarzi, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Rational surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is suggested for some selected surgical processes. However, inappropriate utilization of antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces benefits and increases costs and risks, such as antibiotic resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the current practice of antibiotics prescribed by surgeons in common otologic surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among otolaryngologists with at least 5 years of experience in common otologic surgeries (tympanoplasty, tympanomastoidectomy, stapes, or middle ear exploration (MEE) surgeries). A total of 257 otolaryngologists filled a checklist about their selected regimen and timing of antibiotic(s) administration. RESULTS: The rates of antibiotic prophylaxis prescription in dry and wet ears in tympanoplasty were 7.4% and 87.1% (preoperative), 40.9% and 47% (intraoperative), 88.3% and 98% (postoperative); in tympanomastoidectomy with no cholesteatoma were 7.1% and 97.8% (preoperative), 39.6% and 50.9% (intraoperative), 93.7% and 99.6% (postoperative); in tympanomastoidectomy with cholesteatoma were 14% and 98.3% (preoperative), 45.4% and 51.9% (intraoperative), 98.3% and 99.6% (postoperative), respectively, and in stapes or MEE surgeries were 6.4% (preoperative), 41.7% (intraoperative) and 73.1% (postoperative), respectively. There were no significant differences in the rates of prescribing intraoperative prophylaxis between wet and dry ears, except in tympanomastoidectomy without cholesteatoma. Overall, the most prescribed antibiotics were cephazolin, cephlexin, and ciprofloxacin drop. CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed the inappropriate administration and timing of antibiotic prophylaxis regarding current literature evidence. Despite the lack of evidence on the potential role of antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated and contaminated ears, a significant number of surgeons prescribed prophylactic antibiotics in tympanoplasty and tympanomastoidectomy without cholesteatoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8829788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88297882022-02-24 Prophylactic Antibiotic Practices in Common Otologic Surgeries in Iran Faramarzi, Mohammad Faramarzi, Ali Roosta, Sareh Rabiei, Nikta Faramarzi, Hossein Iran J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Rational surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is suggested for some selected surgical processes. However, inappropriate utilization of antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces benefits and increases costs and risks, such as antibiotic resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the current practice of antibiotics prescribed by surgeons in common otologic surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among otolaryngologists with at least 5 years of experience in common otologic surgeries (tympanoplasty, tympanomastoidectomy, stapes, or middle ear exploration (MEE) surgeries). A total of 257 otolaryngologists filled a checklist about their selected regimen and timing of antibiotic(s) administration. RESULTS: The rates of antibiotic prophylaxis prescription in dry and wet ears in tympanoplasty were 7.4% and 87.1% (preoperative), 40.9% and 47% (intraoperative), 88.3% and 98% (postoperative); in tympanomastoidectomy with no cholesteatoma were 7.1% and 97.8% (preoperative), 39.6% and 50.9% (intraoperative), 93.7% and 99.6% (postoperative); in tympanomastoidectomy with cholesteatoma were 14% and 98.3% (preoperative), 45.4% and 51.9% (intraoperative), 98.3% and 99.6% (postoperative), respectively, and in stapes or MEE surgeries were 6.4% (preoperative), 41.7% (intraoperative) and 73.1% (postoperative), respectively. There were no significant differences in the rates of prescribing intraoperative prophylaxis between wet and dry ears, except in tympanomastoidectomy without cholesteatoma. Overall, the most prescribed antibiotics were cephazolin, cephlexin, and ciprofloxacin drop. CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed the inappropriate administration and timing of antibiotic prophylaxis regarding current literature evidence. Despite the lack of evidence on the potential role of antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated and contaminated ears, a significant number of surgeons prescribed prophylactic antibiotics in tympanoplasty and tympanomastoidectomy without cholesteatoma. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8829788/ /pubmed/35223655 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2021.56803.2959 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Faramarzi, Mohammad
Faramarzi, Ali
Roosta, Sareh
Rabiei, Nikta
Faramarzi, Hossein
Prophylactic Antibiotic Practices in Common Otologic Surgeries in Iran
title Prophylactic Antibiotic Practices in Common Otologic Surgeries in Iran
title_full Prophylactic Antibiotic Practices in Common Otologic Surgeries in Iran
title_fullStr Prophylactic Antibiotic Practices in Common Otologic Surgeries in Iran
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic Antibiotic Practices in Common Otologic Surgeries in Iran
title_short Prophylactic Antibiotic Practices in Common Otologic Surgeries in Iran
title_sort prophylactic antibiotic practices in common otologic surgeries in iran
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223655
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2021.56803.2959
work_keys_str_mv AT faramarzimohammad prophylacticantibioticpracticesincommonotologicsurgeriesiniran
AT faramarziali prophylacticantibioticpracticesincommonotologicsurgeriesiniran
AT roostasareh prophylacticantibioticpracticesincommonotologicsurgeriesiniran
AT rabieinikta prophylacticantibioticpracticesincommonotologicsurgeriesiniran
AT faramarzihossein prophylacticantibioticpracticesincommonotologicsurgeriesiniran