Cargando…
Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations
[Image: see text] We present a benchmark study of density functional approximation (DFA) performances in predicting the two-photon-absorption strengths in π-conjugated molecules containing electron-donating/-accepting moieties. A set of 48 organic molecules is chosen for this purpose, for which the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35080389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01056 |
_version_ | 1784648198708527104 |
---|---|
author | Chołuj, Marta Alam, Md. Mehboob Beerepoot, Maarten T. P. Sitkiewicz, Sebastian P. Matito, Eduard Ruud, Kenneth Zaleśny, Robert |
author_facet | Chołuj, Marta Alam, Md. Mehboob Beerepoot, Maarten T. P. Sitkiewicz, Sebastian P. Matito, Eduard Ruud, Kenneth Zaleśny, Robert |
author_sort | Chołuj, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] We present a benchmark study of density functional approximation (DFA) performances in predicting the two-photon-absorption strengths in π-conjugated molecules containing electron-donating/-accepting moieties. A set of 48 organic molecules is chosen for this purpose, for which the two-photon-absorption (2PA) parameters are evaluated using different DFAs, including BLYP, PBE, B3LYP, PBE0, CAM-B3LYP, LC-BLYP, and optimally tuned LC-BLYP. Minnesota functionals and ωB97X-D are also used, applying the two-state approximation, for a subset of molecules. The efficient resolution-of-identity implementation of the coupled-cluster CC2 model (RI-CC2) is used as a reference for the assessment of the DFAs. Two-state models within the framework of both DFAs and RI-CC2 are used to gain a deeper insight into the performance of different DFAs. Our results give a clear picture of the performance of the density functionals in describing the two-photon activity in dipolar π-conjugated systems. The results show that global hybrids are best suited to reproduce the absolute values of 2PA strengths of donor–acceptor molecules. The range-separated functionals CAM-B3LYP and optimally tuned LC-BLYP, however, show the highest linear correlations with the reference RI-CC2 results. Hence, we recommend the latter DFAs for structure–property studies across large series of dipolar compounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8830054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88300542022-02-11 Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations Chołuj, Marta Alam, Md. Mehboob Beerepoot, Maarten T. P. Sitkiewicz, Sebastian P. Matito, Eduard Ruud, Kenneth Zaleśny, Robert J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] We present a benchmark study of density functional approximation (DFA) performances in predicting the two-photon-absorption strengths in π-conjugated molecules containing electron-donating/-accepting moieties. A set of 48 organic molecules is chosen for this purpose, for which the two-photon-absorption (2PA) parameters are evaluated using different DFAs, including BLYP, PBE, B3LYP, PBE0, CAM-B3LYP, LC-BLYP, and optimally tuned LC-BLYP. Minnesota functionals and ωB97X-D are also used, applying the two-state approximation, for a subset of molecules. The efficient resolution-of-identity implementation of the coupled-cluster CC2 model (RI-CC2) is used as a reference for the assessment of the DFAs. Two-state models within the framework of both DFAs and RI-CC2 are used to gain a deeper insight into the performance of different DFAs. Our results give a clear picture of the performance of the density functionals in describing the two-photon activity in dipolar π-conjugated systems. The results show that global hybrids are best suited to reproduce the absolute values of 2PA strengths of donor–acceptor molecules. The range-separated functionals CAM-B3LYP and optimally tuned LC-BLYP, however, show the highest linear correlations with the reference RI-CC2 results. Hence, we recommend the latter DFAs for structure–property studies across large series of dipolar compounds. American Chemical Society 2022-01-26 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8830054/ /pubmed/35080389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01056 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Chołuj, Marta Alam, Md. Mehboob Beerepoot, Maarten T. P. Sitkiewicz, Sebastian P. Matito, Eduard Ruud, Kenneth Zaleśny, Robert Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations |
title | Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption
Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations |
title_full | Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption
Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations |
title_fullStr | Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption
Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations |
title_full_unstemmed | Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption
Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations |
title_short | Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption
Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations |
title_sort | choosing bad versus worse: predictions of two-photon-absorption
strengths based on popular density functional approximations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35080389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01056 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chołujmarta choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations AT alammdmehboob choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations AT beerepootmaartentp choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations AT sitkiewiczsebastianp choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations AT matitoeduard choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations AT ruudkenneth choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations AT zalesnyrobert choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations |