Cargando…

Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations

[Image: see text] We present a benchmark study of density functional approximation (DFA) performances in predicting the two-photon-absorption strengths in π-conjugated molecules containing electron-donating/-accepting moieties. A set of 48 organic molecules is chosen for this purpose, for which the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chołuj, Marta, Alam, Md. Mehboob, Beerepoot, Maarten T. P., Sitkiewicz, Sebastian P., Matito, Eduard, Ruud, Kenneth, Zaleśny, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35080389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01056
_version_ 1784648198708527104
author Chołuj, Marta
Alam, Md. Mehboob
Beerepoot, Maarten T. P.
Sitkiewicz, Sebastian P.
Matito, Eduard
Ruud, Kenneth
Zaleśny, Robert
author_facet Chołuj, Marta
Alam, Md. Mehboob
Beerepoot, Maarten T. P.
Sitkiewicz, Sebastian P.
Matito, Eduard
Ruud, Kenneth
Zaleśny, Robert
author_sort Chołuj, Marta
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] We present a benchmark study of density functional approximation (DFA) performances in predicting the two-photon-absorption strengths in π-conjugated molecules containing electron-donating/-accepting moieties. A set of 48 organic molecules is chosen for this purpose, for which the two-photon-absorption (2PA) parameters are evaluated using different DFAs, including BLYP, PBE, B3LYP, PBE0, CAM-B3LYP, LC-BLYP, and optimally tuned LC-BLYP. Minnesota functionals and ωB97X-D are also used, applying the two-state approximation, for a subset of molecules. The efficient resolution-of-identity implementation of the coupled-cluster CC2 model (RI-CC2) is used as a reference for the assessment of the DFAs. Two-state models within the framework of both DFAs and RI-CC2 are used to gain a deeper insight into the performance of different DFAs. Our results give a clear picture of the performance of the density functionals in describing the two-photon activity in dipolar π-conjugated systems. The results show that global hybrids are best suited to reproduce the absolute values of 2PA strengths of donor–acceptor molecules. The range-separated functionals CAM-B3LYP and optimally tuned LC-BLYP, however, show the highest linear correlations with the reference RI-CC2 results. Hence, we recommend the latter DFAs for structure–property studies across large series of dipolar compounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8830054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88300542022-02-11 Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations Chołuj, Marta Alam, Md. Mehboob Beerepoot, Maarten T. P. Sitkiewicz, Sebastian P. Matito, Eduard Ruud, Kenneth Zaleśny, Robert J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] We present a benchmark study of density functional approximation (DFA) performances in predicting the two-photon-absorption strengths in π-conjugated molecules containing electron-donating/-accepting moieties. A set of 48 organic molecules is chosen for this purpose, for which the two-photon-absorption (2PA) parameters are evaluated using different DFAs, including BLYP, PBE, B3LYP, PBE0, CAM-B3LYP, LC-BLYP, and optimally tuned LC-BLYP. Minnesota functionals and ωB97X-D are also used, applying the two-state approximation, for a subset of molecules. The efficient resolution-of-identity implementation of the coupled-cluster CC2 model (RI-CC2) is used as a reference for the assessment of the DFAs. Two-state models within the framework of both DFAs and RI-CC2 are used to gain a deeper insight into the performance of different DFAs. Our results give a clear picture of the performance of the density functionals in describing the two-photon activity in dipolar π-conjugated systems. The results show that global hybrids are best suited to reproduce the absolute values of 2PA strengths of donor–acceptor molecules. The range-separated functionals CAM-B3LYP and optimally tuned LC-BLYP, however, show the highest linear correlations with the reference RI-CC2 results. Hence, we recommend the latter DFAs for structure–property studies across large series of dipolar compounds. American Chemical Society 2022-01-26 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8830054/ /pubmed/35080389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01056 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Chołuj, Marta
Alam, Md. Mehboob
Beerepoot, Maarten T. P.
Sitkiewicz, Sebastian P.
Matito, Eduard
Ruud, Kenneth
Zaleśny, Robert
Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations
title Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations
title_full Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations
title_fullStr Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations
title_full_unstemmed Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations
title_short Choosing Bad versus Worse: Predictions of Two-Photon-Absorption Strengths Based on Popular Density Functional Approximations
title_sort choosing bad versus worse: predictions of two-photon-absorption strengths based on popular density functional approximations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35080389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01056
work_keys_str_mv AT chołujmarta choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations
AT alammdmehboob choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations
AT beerepootmaartentp choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations
AT sitkiewiczsebastianp choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations
AT matitoeduard choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations
AT ruudkenneth choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations
AT zalesnyrobert choosingbadversusworsepredictionsoftwophotonabsorptionstrengthsbasedonpopulardensityfunctionalapproximations