Cargando…
Assessing negative core beliefs in eating disorders: revision of the Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire
BACKGROUND: Increased theoretical and empirical attention has been given to examining the role of core beliefs in both the development and maintenance of eating disorders (EDs). The Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire (ED-CBQ) is self-report measure designed to assess five dimensions of core...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00542-9 |
_version_ | 1784648220813557760 |
---|---|
author | Hatoum, Amaani H. Burton, Amy L. Abbott, Maree J. |
author_facet | Hatoum, Amaani H. Burton, Amy L. Abbott, Maree J. |
author_sort | Hatoum, Amaani H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increased theoretical and empirical attention has been given to examining the role of core beliefs in both the development and maintenance of eating disorders (EDs). The Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire (ED-CBQ) is self-report measure designed to assess five dimensions of core beliefs relating to eating disorders; self-loathing, unassertive/inhibited, demanding/needing help and support, abandoned/deprived, and high standards for the self. The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the ED-CBQ and to develop a revised and improved version of the original measure after evaluating its factor structure and related properties. METHODS: A sample of undergraduate university students (N = 763) completed an online test battery of questionnaires. Putative ED-symptomatic (n = 384) and non-ED (n = 379) subgroups were created from self-reported responses from the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDEQ). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were performed, and internal consistency, construct validity, group differences and clinical utility was examined. RESULTS: An initial CFA did not support the original five-factor 40-item ED-CBQ. A revised version was developed that possessed equal or superior psychometric properties to the original 40-item measure. The ED-CBQ-R demonstrated superior model fit, similar levels of reliability and construct validity, and the ability to discriminate between putative ED diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the ED-CBQ-R is a valid, reliable, but more importantly an efficient and accessible measure with the potential to be utilised both clinically and in research settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40337-022-00542-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8830168 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88301682022-02-11 Assessing negative core beliefs in eating disorders: revision of the Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire Hatoum, Amaani H. Burton, Amy L. Abbott, Maree J. J Eat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Increased theoretical and empirical attention has been given to examining the role of core beliefs in both the development and maintenance of eating disorders (EDs). The Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire (ED-CBQ) is self-report measure designed to assess five dimensions of core beliefs relating to eating disorders; self-loathing, unassertive/inhibited, demanding/needing help and support, abandoned/deprived, and high standards for the self. The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the ED-CBQ and to develop a revised and improved version of the original measure after evaluating its factor structure and related properties. METHODS: A sample of undergraduate university students (N = 763) completed an online test battery of questionnaires. Putative ED-symptomatic (n = 384) and non-ED (n = 379) subgroups were created from self-reported responses from the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDEQ). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were performed, and internal consistency, construct validity, group differences and clinical utility was examined. RESULTS: An initial CFA did not support the original five-factor 40-item ED-CBQ. A revised version was developed that possessed equal or superior psychometric properties to the original 40-item measure. The ED-CBQ-R demonstrated superior model fit, similar levels of reliability and construct validity, and the ability to discriminate between putative ED diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the ED-CBQ-R is a valid, reliable, but more importantly an efficient and accessible measure with the potential to be utilised both clinically and in research settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40337-022-00542-9. BioMed Central 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8830168/ /pubmed/35144689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00542-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hatoum, Amaani H. Burton, Amy L. Abbott, Maree J. Assessing negative core beliefs in eating disorders: revision of the Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire |
title | Assessing negative core beliefs in eating disorders: revision of the Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire |
title_full | Assessing negative core beliefs in eating disorders: revision of the Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Assessing negative core beliefs in eating disorders: revision of the Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing negative core beliefs in eating disorders: revision of the Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire |
title_short | Assessing negative core beliefs in eating disorders: revision of the Eating Disorder Core Beliefs Questionnaire |
title_sort | assessing negative core beliefs in eating disorders: revision of the eating disorder core beliefs questionnaire |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830168/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00542-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hatoumamaanih assessingnegativecorebeliefsineatingdisordersrevisionoftheeatingdisordercorebeliefsquestionnaire AT burtonamyl assessingnegativecorebeliefsineatingdisordersrevisionoftheeatingdisordercorebeliefsquestionnaire AT abbottmareej assessingnegativecorebeliefsineatingdisordersrevisionoftheeatingdisordercorebeliefsquestionnaire |