Cargando…

Differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study

The aim of surgical training across the 10 surgical specialties is to produce competent day 1 consultants. Progression through training in the UK is assessed by the Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine variation in ARCP outcomes within surgical train...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hope, Carla, Lund, Jonathan, Griffiths, Gareth, Humes, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053391
_version_ 1784648229108842496
author Hope, Carla
Lund, Jonathan
Griffiths, Gareth
Humes, David
author_facet Hope, Carla
Lund, Jonathan
Griffiths, Gareth
Humes, David
author_sort Hope, Carla
collection PubMed
description The aim of surgical training across the 10 surgical specialties is to produce competent day 1 consultants. Progression through training in the UK is assessed by the Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine variation in ARCP outcomes within surgical training and identify differences in outcomes between specialties. DESIGN: A national cohort study using data from the UK Medical Education Database was performed. ARCP outcome was the primary outcome measure. Multilevel ordinal regression analyses were performed, with ARCP outcomes nested within trainees. PARTICIPANTS: Higher surgical trainees (ST3–ST8) from nine UK surgical specialties were included (vascular surgery was excluded due to insufficient data). All surgical trainees across the UK with an ARCP outcome between 2010 and 2017 were included. RESULTS: Eight thousand two hundred and twenty trainees with an ARCP outcome awarded between 2010 and 2017 were included, comprising 31 788 ARCP outcomes. There was substantial variation in the proportion of non-standard outcomes recorded across specialties with general surgery trainees having the highest proportion of non-standard outcomes (22.5%) and urology trainees the fewest (12.4%). After adjustment, general surgery trainees were 1.3 times more likely to receive a non-standard ARCP outcome compared with trainees in trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.45, p=0.001). Urology trainees were 36% less likely to receive a non-standard outcome compared with T&O trainees (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.75, p<0.001). Female trainees and older age were associated with non-standard outcomes (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.22, p=0.020; OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.05, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the training outcome assessments across surgical specialties. General surgery has higher rates of non-standard outcomes compared with other surgical specialties. Across all specialties, female sex and older age were associated with non-standard outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8830220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88302202022-02-22 Differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study Hope, Carla Lund, Jonathan Griffiths, Gareth Humes, David BMJ Open Medical Education and Training The aim of surgical training across the 10 surgical specialties is to produce competent day 1 consultants. Progression through training in the UK is assessed by the Annual Review of Competency Progression (ARCP). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine variation in ARCP outcomes within surgical training and identify differences in outcomes between specialties. DESIGN: A national cohort study using data from the UK Medical Education Database was performed. ARCP outcome was the primary outcome measure. Multilevel ordinal regression analyses were performed, with ARCP outcomes nested within trainees. PARTICIPANTS: Higher surgical trainees (ST3–ST8) from nine UK surgical specialties were included (vascular surgery was excluded due to insufficient data). All surgical trainees across the UK with an ARCP outcome between 2010 and 2017 were included. RESULTS: Eight thousand two hundred and twenty trainees with an ARCP outcome awarded between 2010 and 2017 were included, comprising 31 788 ARCP outcomes. There was substantial variation in the proportion of non-standard outcomes recorded across specialties with general surgery trainees having the highest proportion of non-standard outcomes (22.5%) and urology trainees the fewest (12.4%). After adjustment, general surgery trainees were 1.3 times more likely to receive a non-standard ARCP outcome compared with trainees in trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.45, p=0.001). Urology trainees were 36% less likely to receive a non-standard outcome compared with T&O trainees (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.75, p<0.001). Female trainees and older age were associated with non-standard outcomes (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.22, p=0.020; OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.05, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the training outcome assessments across surgical specialties. General surgery has higher rates of non-standard outcomes compared with other surgical specialties. Across all specialties, female sex and older age were associated with non-standard outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8830220/ /pubmed/35140154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053391 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Hope, Carla
Lund, Jonathan
Griffiths, Gareth
Humes, David
Differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study
title Differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study
title_full Differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study
title_fullStr Differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study
title_short Differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study
title_sort differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053391
work_keys_str_mv AT hopecarla differencesinprogressionbysurgicalspecialtyanationalcohortstudy
AT lundjonathan differencesinprogressionbysurgicalspecialtyanationalcohortstudy
AT griffithsgareth differencesinprogressionbysurgicalspecialtyanationalcohortstudy
AT humesdavid differencesinprogressionbysurgicalspecialtyanationalcohortstudy