Cargando…

Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization

BACKGROUND: Clinically evident portal hypertension (CEPH) was previously identified as a prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little is known about the prognostic influence of CEPH on the long‐term outcome of patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoemb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Lukas, Hahn, Felix, Mähringer‐Kunz, Aline, Stoehr, Fabian, Gairing, Simon Johannes, Foerster, Friedrich, Weinmann, Arndt, Galle, Peter Robert, Mittler, Jens, Pinto dos Santos, Daniel, Pitton, Michael Bernhard, Düber, Christoph, Fehrenbach, Uli, Auer, Timo Alexander, Gebauer, Bernhard, Kloeckner, Roman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12188
_version_ 1784648239404810240
author Müller, Lukas
Hahn, Felix
Mähringer‐Kunz, Aline
Stoehr, Fabian
Gairing, Simon Johannes
Foerster, Friedrich
Weinmann, Arndt
Galle, Peter Robert
Mittler, Jens
Pinto dos Santos, Daniel
Pitton, Michael Bernhard
Düber, Christoph
Fehrenbach, Uli
Auer, Timo Alexander
Gebauer, Bernhard
Kloeckner, Roman
author_facet Müller, Lukas
Hahn, Felix
Mähringer‐Kunz, Aline
Stoehr, Fabian
Gairing, Simon Johannes
Foerster, Friedrich
Weinmann, Arndt
Galle, Peter Robert
Mittler, Jens
Pinto dos Santos, Daniel
Pitton, Michael Bernhard
Düber, Christoph
Fehrenbach, Uli
Auer, Timo Alexander
Gebauer, Bernhard
Kloeckner, Roman
author_sort Müller, Lukas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinically evident portal hypertension (CEPH) was previously identified as a prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little is known about the prognostic influence of CEPH on the long‐term outcome of patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), particularly in Western populations. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the prevalence and prognostic influence of CEPH in a Western population of patients with HCC undergoing TACE. METHODS: This retrospective study included 349 treatment‐naïve patients that received initial TACE treatment at our tertiary care center between January 2010 and November 2020. CEPH was defined as a combination of ascites, esophageal/gastric varices, splenomegaly and a low platelet count. We assessed the influence of CEPH and its defining factors on median overall survival (OS) in HCC patients. We compared the effects of CEPH to those of well‐known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of the 349 patients included, 304 (87.1%) patients had liver cirrhosis. CEPH was present in 241 (69.1%) patients. The median OS times were 10.6 months for patients with CEPH and 17.1 months for patients without CEPH (log rank p = 0.036). Median OS without a present surrogate was 17.1 months, while patients with one respectively more than two present CEPH surrogates had a median OS of 10.8 and 9.4 months (log rank p = 0.053). In multivariate analysis, CEPH was no significant risk factor for OS (p = 0.190). Of the CEPH‐defining factors, only ascites reached significance in a univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: CEPH was present in more than two thirds of the patients with HCC undergoing TACE in our cohort of Western patients. Patients with CEPH had a significantly impaired survival in univariate analysis. However, no significance was reached in multivariate analysis. Thus, when TACE treatment is deemed oncologically reasonable, patients should not be excluded from TACE treatment due to the presence of surrogates of portal hypertension alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8830270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88302702022-02-14 Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization Müller, Lukas Hahn, Felix Mähringer‐Kunz, Aline Stoehr, Fabian Gairing, Simon Johannes Foerster, Friedrich Weinmann, Arndt Galle, Peter Robert Mittler, Jens Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Pitton, Michael Bernhard Düber, Christoph Fehrenbach, Uli Auer, Timo Alexander Gebauer, Bernhard Kloeckner, Roman United European Gastroenterol J Hepatobiliary BACKGROUND: Clinically evident portal hypertension (CEPH) was previously identified as a prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little is known about the prognostic influence of CEPH on the long‐term outcome of patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), particularly in Western populations. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the prevalence and prognostic influence of CEPH in a Western population of patients with HCC undergoing TACE. METHODS: This retrospective study included 349 treatment‐naïve patients that received initial TACE treatment at our tertiary care center between January 2010 and November 2020. CEPH was defined as a combination of ascites, esophageal/gastric varices, splenomegaly and a low platelet count. We assessed the influence of CEPH and its defining factors on median overall survival (OS) in HCC patients. We compared the effects of CEPH to those of well‐known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of the 349 patients included, 304 (87.1%) patients had liver cirrhosis. CEPH was present in 241 (69.1%) patients. The median OS times were 10.6 months for patients with CEPH and 17.1 months for patients without CEPH (log rank p = 0.036). Median OS without a present surrogate was 17.1 months, while patients with one respectively more than two present CEPH surrogates had a median OS of 10.8 and 9.4 months (log rank p = 0.053). In multivariate analysis, CEPH was no significant risk factor for OS (p = 0.190). Of the CEPH‐defining factors, only ascites reached significance in a univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: CEPH was present in more than two thirds of the patients with HCC undergoing TACE in our cohort of Western patients. Patients with CEPH had a significantly impaired survival in univariate analysis. However, no significance was reached in multivariate analysis. Thus, when TACE treatment is deemed oncologically reasonable, patients should not be excluded from TACE treatment due to the presence of surrogates of portal hypertension alone. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8830270/ /pubmed/34918471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12188 Text en © 2021 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Hepatobiliary
Müller, Lukas
Hahn, Felix
Mähringer‐Kunz, Aline
Stoehr, Fabian
Gairing, Simon Johannes
Foerster, Friedrich
Weinmann, Arndt
Galle, Peter Robert
Mittler, Jens
Pinto dos Santos, Daniel
Pitton, Michael Bernhard
Düber, Christoph
Fehrenbach, Uli
Auer, Timo Alexander
Gebauer, Bernhard
Kloeckner, Roman
Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization
title Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization
title_full Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization
title_fullStr Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization
title_short Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization
title_sort prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization
topic Hepatobiliary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12188
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerlukas prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT hahnfelix prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT mahringerkunzaline prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT stoehrfabian prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT gairingsimonjohannes prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT foersterfriedrich prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT weinmannarndt prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT gallepeterrobert prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT mittlerjens prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT pintodossantosdaniel prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT pittonmichaelbernhard prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT duberchristoph prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT fehrenbachuli prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT auertimoalexander prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT gebauerbernhard prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization
AT kloecknerroman prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofclinicallyevidentportalhypertensioninpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinomaundergoingtransarterialchemoembolization