Cargando…

Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) has been the focus of numerous observational studies over the years and a common strategy employed in their design is the use of composite and aggregate outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to identify composite and aggregate outcomes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magro, Fernando, Alves, Catarina, Santiago, Mafalda, Ministro, Paula, Lago, Paula, Correia, Luís, Gonçalves, Raquel, Carvalho, Diana, Portela, Francisco, Dias, Cláudia Camila, Dignass, Axel, Danese, Silvio, Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent, Estevinho, Maria Manuela, Moreira, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12183
_version_ 1784648242138447872
author Magro, Fernando
Alves, Catarina
Santiago, Mafalda
Ministro, Paula
Lago, Paula
Correia, Luís
Gonçalves, Raquel
Carvalho, Diana
Portela, Francisco
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Dignass, Axel
Danese, Silvio
Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent
Estevinho, Maria Manuela
Moreira, Paula
author_facet Magro, Fernando
Alves, Catarina
Santiago, Mafalda
Ministro, Paula
Lago, Paula
Correia, Luís
Gonçalves, Raquel
Carvalho, Diana
Portela, Francisco
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Dignass, Axel
Danese, Silvio
Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent
Estevinho, Maria Manuela
Moreira, Paula
author_sort Magro, Fernando
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) has been the focus of numerous observational studies over the years and a common strategy employed in their design is the use of composite and aggregate outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to identify composite and aggregate outcomes of observational studies in UC and to evaluate how the number and type of variables included and the length of follow‐up affect the frequency of patients that achieve these outcomes. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out using MEDLINE [via PubMed], Scopus, and Web of Science online databases. Observational studies that included UC patients and reported composite or aggregate outcomes were identified. A set of variables considered to be representative of progressive or disabling UC was defined, the proportion of patients attaining the outcomes was determined and a random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed by dividing the identified studies into subgroups according to different criteria of interest. RESULTS: A total of 10,264 records were identified in the systematic search, of which 33 were retained for qualitative analysis and 20 were included in the meta‐analysis. The mean frequency for composite outcomes was 0.363 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.323‐0.403]. The frequency of composite outcome for the subgroup of studies that included the variable “Biologics” was significantly higher than for those in which this variable was not reported [0.410; 95% CI 0.364‐0.457 versus 0.298; 95% CI 0.232‐0.364; p = 0.006]. Composite outcomes were also more frequent as the follow‐up duration increased. CONCLUSION: The frequency of composite outcomes in observational studies of UC is dependent on the specific identity of the variables being reported. Moreover, longer follow‐up periods are associated with higher frequencies of composite outcomes. The evidence provided here is useful for the design of future observational studies of UC that aim to maximize the frequency of patients that achieve composite outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8830283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88302832022-02-14 Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Magro, Fernando Alves, Catarina Santiago, Mafalda Ministro, Paula Lago, Paula Correia, Luís Gonçalves, Raquel Carvalho, Diana Portela, Francisco Dias, Cláudia Camila Dignass, Axel Danese, Silvio Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent Estevinho, Maria Manuela Moreira, Paula United European Gastroenterol J Inflammatory Bowel Disease BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) has been the focus of numerous observational studies over the years and a common strategy employed in their design is the use of composite and aggregate outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to identify composite and aggregate outcomes of observational studies in UC and to evaluate how the number and type of variables included and the length of follow‐up affect the frequency of patients that achieve these outcomes. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out using MEDLINE [via PubMed], Scopus, and Web of Science online databases. Observational studies that included UC patients and reported composite or aggregate outcomes were identified. A set of variables considered to be representative of progressive or disabling UC was defined, the proportion of patients attaining the outcomes was determined and a random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed by dividing the identified studies into subgroups according to different criteria of interest. RESULTS: A total of 10,264 records were identified in the systematic search, of which 33 were retained for qualitative analysis and 20 were included in the meta‐analysis. The mean frequency for composite outcomes was 0.363 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.323‐0.403]. The frequency of composite outcome for the subgroup of studies that included the variable “Biologics” was significantly higher than for those in which this variable was not reported [0.410; 95% CI 0.364‐0.457 versus 0.298; 95% CI 0.232‐0.364; p = 0.006]. Composite outcomes were also more frequent as the follow‐up duration increased. CONCLUSION: The frequency of composite outcomes in observational studies of UC is dependent on the specific identity of the variables being reported. Moreover, longer follow‐up periods are associated with higher frequencies of composite outcomes. The evidence provided here is useful for the design of future observational studies of UC that aim to maximize the frequency of patients that achieve composite outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8830283/ /pubmed/34907660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12183 Text en © 2021 The Authors. United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Magro, Fernando
Alves, Catarina
Santiago, Mafalda
Ministro, Paula
Lago, Paula
Correia, Luís
Gonçalves, Raquel
Carvalho, Diana
Portela, Francisco
Dias, Cláudia Camila
Dignass, Axel
Danese, Silvio
Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent
Estevinho, Maria Manuela
Moreira, Paula
Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Inflammatory Bowel Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12183
work_keys_str_mv AT magrofernando compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alvescatarina compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT santiagomafalda compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ministropaula compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lagopaula compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT correialuis compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goncalvesraquel compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carvalhodiana compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT portelafrancisco compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT diasclaudiacamila compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dignassaxel compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT danesesilvio compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT peyrinbirouletlaurent compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT estevinhomariamanuela compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moreirapaula compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT compositeoutcomesinobservationalstudiesofulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis