Cargando…

Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study

Background Contaminated toothbrushes can cause several oral and systemic illnesses. This study aimed to identify the most rapid, effective, and affordable method for toothbrush decontamination. In addition, the most prevalent bacterial species colonizing toothbrushes were determined. Methodology Too...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assari, Ahmad S, Mohammed Mahrous, Mohammed, Ahmad, Yahia A, Alotaibi, Faisal, Alshammari, Moath, AlTurki, Firas, AlShammari, Thwaini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35165574
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21117
_version_ 1784648287823855616
author Assari, Ahmad S
Mohammed Mahrous, Mohammed
Ahmad, Yahia A
Alotaibi, Faisal
Alshammari, Moath
AlTurki, Firas
AlShammari, Thwaini
author_facet Assari, Ahmad S
Mohammed Mahrous, Mohammed
Ahmad, Yahia A
Alotaibi, Faisal
Alshammari, Moath
AlTurki, Firas
AlShammari, Thwaini
author_sort Assari, Ahmad S
collection PubMed
description Background Contaminated toothbrushes can cause several oral and systemic illnesses. This study aimed to identify the most rapid, effective, and affordable method for toothbrush decontamination. In addition, the most prevalent bacterial species colonizing toothbrushes were determined. Methodology Toothbrushes were collected after two weeks of use by 55 volunteers. The bacterial count was measured before and after sterilization using 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 0.1% Listerine, 70% white alcohol, 10% povidone-iodine, 1% sodium hypochlorite, 2% glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet radiation, microwave irradiation, 3% hydrogen peroxide, and 100% white vinegar, with tap water rinse as the control. Results A marked reduction in the bacterial count was observed pre- and post-sterilization. All sterilization methods were effective for toothbrush disinfection. Sterilization using 2% glutaraldehyde and 3% hydrogen peroxide solutions resulted in the most significant reduction in the mean bacterial count and percentage reduction in the total bacterial count, respectively. The toothbrush samples were also colonized by several different types of bacteria. The most common colonizing bacterial species included Bacillus subtilis (28% prevalence), Sacrina (26% prevalence),and Streptococcus pneumoniae (24% prevalence). Conclusions Because bacterial contamination cannot be eliminated and different species colonize toothbrush surfaces, cleaning and disinfection are essential to prevent disease transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8830509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88305092022-02-13 Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study Assari, Ahmad S Mohammed Mahrous, Mohammed Ahmad, Yahia A Alotaibi, Faisal Alshammari, Moath AlTurki, Firas AlShammari, Thwaini Cureus Public Health Background Contaminated toothbrushes can cause several oral and systemic illnesses. This study aimed to identify the most rapid, effective, and affordable method for toothbrush decontamination. In addition, the most prevalent bacterial species colonizing toothbrushes were determined. Methodology Toothbrushes were collected after two weeks of use by 55 volunteers. The bacterial count was measured before and after sterilization using 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 0.1% Listerine, 70% white alcohol, 10% povidone-iodine, 1% sodium hypochlorite, 2% glutaraldehyde, ultraviolet radiation, microwave irradiation, 3% hydrogen peroxide, and 100% white vinegar, with tap water rinse as the control. Results A marked reduction in the bacterial count was observed pre- and post-sterilization. All sterilization methods were effective for toothbrush disinfection. Sterilization using 2% glutaraldehyde and 3% hydrogen peroxide solutions resulted in the most significant reduction in the mean bacterial count and percentage reduction in the total bacterial count, respectively. The toothbrush samples were also colonized by several different types of bacteria. The most common colonizing bacterial species included Bacillus subtilis (28% prevalence), Sacrina (26% prevalence),and Streptococcus pneumoniae (24% prevalence). Conclusions Because bacterial contamination cannot be eliminated and different species colonize toothbrush surfaces, cleaning and disinfection are essential to prevent disease transmission. Cureus 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8830509/ /pubmed/35165574 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21117 Text en Copyright © 2022, Assari et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Public Health
Assari, Ahmad S
Mohammed Mahrous, Mohammed
Ahmad, Yahia A
Alotaibi, Faisal
Alshammari, Moath
AlTurki, Firas
AlShammari, Thwaini
Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study
title Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study
title_full Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study
title_fullStr Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study
title_short Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study
title_sort efficacy of different sterilization techniques for toothbrush decontamination: an ex vivo study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35165574
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21117
work_keys_str_mv AT assariahmads efficacyofdifferentsterilizationtechniquesfortoothbrushdecontaminationanexvivostudy
AT mohammedmahrousmohammed efficacyofdifferentsterilizationtechniquesfortoothbrushdecontaminationanexvivostudy
AT ahmadyahiaa efficacyofdifferentsterilizationtechniquesfortoothbrushdecontaminationanexvivostudy
AT alotaibifaisal efficacyofdifferentsterilizationtechniquesfortoothbrushdecontaminationanexvivostudy
AT alshammarimoath efficacyofdifferentsterilizationtechniquesfortoothbrushdecontaminationanexvivostudy
AT alturkifiras efficacyofdifferentsterilizationtechniquesfortoothbrushdecontaminationanexvivostudy
AT alshammarithwaini efficacyofdifferentsterilizationtechniquesfortoothbrushdecontaminationanexvivostudy