Cargando…

Does powered stapler improve the mechanical integrity of gastrojejunal anastomosis compared to the current techniques? Experimental study in ex vivo porcine models

BACKGROUND: Numerous techniques have been described for fashioning gastrojejunostomy (GJ) in a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. These include hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) and mechanical anastomosis; the latter includes circular stapled anastomosis (CSA) or manual linear stapled anastomosis (mLSA). More rece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sahloul, Mohamed, Kapoulas, Spyridon, Giet, Leeying, Ludwig, Christian, Mahawar, Kamal, Dennison, Ashley R., Singhal, Rishi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35017398
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_222_20
_version_ 1784648300870238208
author Sahloul, Mohamed
Kapoulas, Spyridon
Giet, Leeying
Ludwig, Christian
Mahawar, Kamal
Dennison, Ashley R.
Singhal, Rishi
author_facet Sahloul, Mohamed
Kapoulas, Spyridon
Giet, Leeying
Ludwig, Christian
Mahawar, Kamal
Dennison, Ashley R.
Singhal, Rishi
author_sort Sahloul, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous techniques have been described for fashioning gastrojejunostomy (GJ) in a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. These include hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) and mechanical anastomosis; the latter includes circular stapled anastomosis (CSA) or manual linear stapled anastomosis (mLSA). More recently, this list also includes powered linear stapled anastomosis (pLSA). The aim of this study was to analyse if addition of power to stapling would improve the integrity of GJ anastomosis in ex vivo porcine models. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The present study included five groups – mLSA1, mLSA2, HSA, CSA, and pLSA. Sequential infusions of methylene blue-coloured saline were performed into the GJ models. Pressure readings were recorded till the point of leak denoting burst pressure (BP). Total volume (TV) and site of leak were recorded. Compliance was calculated from the equation ΔTV/ΔBP. RESULTS: Differences in pouch and intestinal thickness were not statistically significant between the models. BPs were higher in the mechanical anastomosis groups, i.e., pLSA 21 ± 9.85 mmHg, CSA 20.33 ± 5.78 mmHg, mLSA1 18 ± 4.69 mmHg and mLSA2 11 ± 2.94 mmHg, when compared to HSA 9.67 ± 3.79 mm Hg, which was found to be statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.03). Overall, the highest BP was recorded for powered stapling followed by circular, and then, linear stapling; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.86). There was no statistically significant difference among groups with regard to compliance (Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.082). CONCLUSION: Despite the limited number of samples, mechanical anastomosis showed a statistically higher BP when compared to HSA, suggesting better anastomotic integrity. The pLSA group showed promising results with the highest BP recorded among all groups; however, this did not reach statistical significance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8830564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88305642022-02-28 Does powered stapler improve the mechanical integrity of gastrojejunal anastomosis compared to the current techniques? Experimental study in ex vivo porcine models Sahloul, Mohamed Kapoulas, Spyridon Giet, Leeying Ludwig, Christian Mahawar, Kamal Dennison, Ashley R. Singhal, Rishi J Minim Access Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Numerous techniques have been described for fashioning gastrojejunostomy (GJ) in a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. These include hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) and mechanical anastomosis; the latter includes circular stapled anastomosis (CSA) or manual linear stapled anastomosis (mLSA). More recently, this list also includes powered linear stapled anastomosis (pLSA). The aim of this study was to analyse if addition of power to stapling would improve the integrity of GJ anastomosis in ex vivo porcine models. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The present study included five groups – mLSA1, mLSA2, HSA, CSA, and pLSA. Sequential infusions of methylene blue-coloured saline were performed into the GJ models. Pressure readings were recorded till the point of leak denoting burst pressure (BP). Total volume (TV) and site of leak were recorded. Compliance was calculated from the equation ΔTV/ΔBP. RESULTS: Differences in pouch and intestinal thickness were not statistically significant between the models. BPs were higher in the mechanical anastomosis groups, i.e., pLSA 21 ± 9.85 mmHg, CSA 20.33 ± 5.78 mmHg, mLSA1 18 ± 4.69 mmHg and mLSA2 11 ± 2.94 mmHg, when compared to HSA 9.67 ± 3.79 mm Hg, which was found to be statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.03). Overall, the highest BP was recorded for powered stapling followed by circular, and then, linear stapling; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.86). There was no statistically significant difference among groups with regard to compliance (Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.082). CONCLUSION: Despite the limited number of samples, mechanical anastomosis showed a statistically higher BP when compared to HSA, suggesting better anastomotic integrity. The pLSA group showed promising results with the highest BP recorded among all groups; however, this did not reach statistical significance. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8830564/ /pubmed/35017398 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_222_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sahloul, Mohamed
Kapoulas, Spyridon
Giet, Leeying
Ludwig, Christian
Mahawar, Kamal
Dennison, Ashley R.
Singhal, Rishi
Does powered stapler improve the mechanical integrity of gastrojejunal anastomosis compared to the current techniques? Experimental study in ex vivo porcine models
title Does powered stapler improve the mechanical integrity of gastrojejunal anastomosis compared to the current techniques? Experimental study in ex vivo porcine models
title_full Does powered stapler improve the mechanical integrity of gastrojejunal anastomosis compared to the current techniques? Experimental study in ex vivo porcine models
title_fullStr Does powered stapler improve the mechanical integrity of gastrojejunal anastomosis compared to the current techniques? Experimental study in ex vivo porcine models
title_full_unstemmed Does powered stapler improve the mechanical integrity of gastrojejunal anastomosis compared to the current techniques? Experimental study in ex vivo porcine models
title_short Does powered stapler improve the mechanical integrity of gastrojejunal anastomosis compared to the current techniques? Experimental study in ex vivo porcine models
title_sort does powered stapler improve the mechanical integrity of gastrojejunal anastomosis compared to the current techniques? experimental study in ex vivo porcine models
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35017398
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_222_20
work_keys_str_mv AT sahloulmohamed doespoweredstaplerimprovethemechanicalintegrityofgastrojejunalanastomosiscomparedtothecurrenttechniquesexperimentalstudyinexvivoporcinemodels
AT kapoulasspyridon doespoweredstaplerimprovethemechanicalintegrityofgastrojejunalanastomosiscomparedtothecurrenttechniquesexperimentalstudyinexvivoporcinemodels
AT gietleeying doespoweredstaplerimprovethemechanicalintegrityofgastrojejunalanastomosiscomparedtothecurrenttechniquesexperimentalstudyinexvivoporcinemodels
AT ludwigchristian doespoweredstaplerimprovethemechanicalintegrityofgastrojejunalanastomosiscomparedtothecurrenttechniquesexperimentalstudyinexvivoporcinemodels
AT mahawarkamal doespoweredstaplerimprovethemechanicalintegrityofgastrojejunalanastomosiscomparedtothecurrenttechniquesexperimentalstudyinexvivoporcinemodels
AT dennisonashleyr doespoweredstaplerimprovethemechanicalintegrityofgastrojejunalanastomosiscomparedtothecurrenttechniquesexperimentalstudyinexvivoporcinemodels
AT singhalrishi doespoweredstaplerimprovethemechanicalintegrityofgastrojejunalanastomosiscomparedtothecurrenttechniquesexperimentalstudyinexvivoporcinemodels