Cargando…

‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible?

BACKGROUND: Despite NICE/AUGIS recommendations, the practice of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) has been particularly poor in the UK offered only by 11%–20% surgeons as compared to 33%–67% internationally, possibly due to financial constraints, logistical difficulties and shortage of expert...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imtiaz, Mohammad, Prakash, Samip, Iqbal, Sara, Fernandes, Roland, Shah, Ankur, Shrestha, Ashish K., Basu, Sanjoy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33885031
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_271_20
_version_ 1784648305060347904
author Imtiaz, Mohammad
Prakash, Samip
Iqbal, Sara
Fernandes, Roland
Shah, Ankur
Shrestha, Ashish K.
Basu, Sanjoy
author_facet Imtiaz, Mohammad
Prakash, Samip
Iqbal, Sara
Fernandes, Roland
Shah, Ankur
Shrestha, Ashish K.
Basu, Sanjoy
author_sort Imtiaz, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite NICE/AUGIS recommendations, the practice of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) has been particularly poor in the UK offered only by 11%–20% surgeons as compared to 33%–67% internationally, possibly due to financial constraints, logistical difficulties and shortage of expertise, thus, reflecting the varied provision of emergency general surgical care. To assess whether emergency general surgeons (EGS) could provide a 'Hot Gall Bladder Service' (HGS) with an acceptable outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective HGS observational study that was protocol driven with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and secure online data collection in a district general hospital between July 2018 and June 2019. A weekly dedicated theatre slot was allocated for this list. RESULTS: Of the 143 referred for HGS, 86 (60%) underwent ELC which included 60 (70%) women. Age, ASA and body mass index was 54* (18–85) years, II* (I-III) and 27* (20–54), respectively. 86 included 46 (53%), 19 (22%), 19 (22%) and 2 (3%) patients presenting with acute calculus cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, biliary colic, and acalculus cholecystitis, respectively. 85 (99%) underwent LC with a single conversion. Grade of surgical difficulty, duration of surgery and post-operative stay was 2* (1–4) 68* (30–240) min and 0* (0–13) day, respectively. Eight (9%) required senior surgical input with no intra-operative complications and 2 (2%) 30-day readmissions. One was post-operative subhepatic collection that recovered uneventfully and the second was pancreatitis, imaging was clear requiring no further intervention. CONCLUSION: In the current climate of NHS financial crunch, COVID pandemic and significant pressure on inpatient beds: Safe and cost-effective HGS can be provided by the EGS with input from upper GI/HPB surgeons (when required) with acceptable morbidity and a satisfactory outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8830581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88305812022-02-28 ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible? Imtiaz, Mohammad Prakash, Samip Iqbal, Sara Fernandes, Roland Shah, Ankur Shrestha, Ashish K. Basu, Sanjoy J Minim Access Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite NICE/AUGIS recommendations, the practice of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) has been particularly poor in the UK offered only by 11%–20% surgeons as compared to 33%–67% internationally, possibly due to financial constraints, logistical difficulties and shortage of expertise, thus, reflecting the varied provision of emergency general surgical care. To assess whether emergency general surgeons (EGS) could provide a 'Hot Gall Bladder Service' (HGS) with an acceptable outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective HGS observational study that was protocol driven with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and secure online data collection in a district general hospital between July 2018 and June 2019. A weekly dedicated theatre slot was allocated for this list. RESULTS: Of the 143 referred for HGS, 86 (60%) underwent ELC which included 60 (70%) women. Age, ASA and body mass index was 54* (18–85) years, II* (I-III) and 27* (20–54), respectively. 86 included 46 (53%), 19 (22%), 19 (22%) and 2 (3%) patients presenting with acute calculus cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, biliary colic, and acalculus cholecystitis, respectively. 85 (99%) underwent LC with a single conversion. Grade of surgical difficulty, duration of surgery and post-operative stay was 2* (1–4) 68* (30–240) min and 0* (0–13) day, respectively. Eight (9%) required senior surgical input with no intra-operative complications and 2 (2%) 30-day readmissions. One was post-operative subhepatic collection that recovered uneventfully and the second was pancreatitis, imaging was clear requiring no further intervention. CONCLUSION: In the current climate of NHS financial crunch, COVID pandemic and significant pressure on inpatient beds: Safe and cost-effective HGS can be provided by the EGS with input from upper GI/HPB surgeons (when required) with acceptable morbidity and a satisfactory outcome. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8830581/ /pubmed/33885031 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_271_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Imtiaz, Mohammad
Prakash, Samip
Iqbal, Sara
Fernandes, Roland
Shah, Ankur
Shrestha, Ashish K.
Basu, Sanjoy
‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible?
title ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible?
title_full ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible?
title_fullStr ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible?
title_full_unstemmed ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible?
title_short ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible?
title_sort ‘hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: is this safe and feasible?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33885031
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_271_20
work_keys_str_mv AT imtiazmohammad hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible
AT prakashsamip hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible
AT iqbalsara hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible
AT fernandesroland hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible
AT shahankur hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible
AT shresthaashishk hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible
AT basusanjoy hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible