Cargando…
‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible?
BACKGROUND: Despite NICE/AUGIS recommendations, the practice of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) has been particularly poor in the UK offered only by 11%–20% surgeons as compared to 33%–67% internationally, possibly due to financial constraints, logistical difficulties and shortage of expert...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33885031 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_271_20 |
_version_ | 1784648305060347904 |
---|---|
author | Imtiaz, Mohammad Prakash, Samip Iqbal, Sara Fernandes, Roland Shah, Ankur Shrestha, Ashish K. Basu, Sanjoy |
author_facet | Imtiaz, Mohammad Prakash, Samip Iqbal, Sara Fernandes, Roland Shah, Ankur Shrestha, Ashish K. Basu, Sanjoy |
author_sort | Imtiaz, Mohammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite NICE/AUGIS recommendations, the practice of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) has been particularly poor in the UK offered only by 11%–20% surgeons as compared to 33%–67% internationally, possibly due to financial constraints, logistical difficulties and shortage of expertise, thus, reflecting the varied provision of emergency general surgical care. To assess whether emergency general surgeons (EGS) could provide a 'Hot Gall Bladder Service' (HGS) with an acceptable outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective HGS observational study that was protocol driven with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and secure online data collection in a district general hospital between July 2018 and June 2019. A weekly dedicated theatre slot was allocated for this list. RESULTS: Of the 143 referred for HGS, 86 (60%) underwent ELC which included 60 (70%) women. Age, ASA and body mass index was 54* (18–85) years, II* (I-III) and 27* (20–54), respectively. 86 included 46 (53%), 19 (22%), 19 (22%) and 2 (3%) patients presenting with acute calculus cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, biliary colic, and acalculus cholecystitis, respectively. 85 (99%) underwent LC with a single conversion. Grade of surgical difficulty, duration of surgery and post-operative stay was 2* (1–4) 68* (30–240) min and 0* (0–13) day, respectively. Eight (9%) required senior surgical input with no intra-operative complications and 2 (2%) 30-day readmissions. One was post-operative subhepatic collection that recovered uneventfully and the second was pancreatitis, imaging was clear requiring no further intervention. CONCLUSION: In the current climate of NHS financial crunch, COVID pandemic and significant pressure on inpatient beds: Safe and cost-effective HGS can be provided by the EGS with input from upper GI/HPB surgeons (when required) with acceptable morbidity and a satisfactory outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8830581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88305812022-02-28 ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible? Imtiaz, Mohammad Prakash, Samip Iqbal, Sara Fernandes, Roland Shah, Ankur Shrestha, Ashish K. Basu, Sanjoy J Minim Access Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite NICE/AUGIS recommendations, the practice of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) has been particularly poor in the UK offered only by 11%–20% surgeons as compared to 33%–67% internationally, possibly due to financial constraints, logistical difficulties and shortage of expertise, thus, reflecting the varied provision of emergency general surgical care. To assess whether emergency general surgeons (EGS) could provide a 'Hot Gall Bladder Service' (HGS) with an acceptable outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective HGS observational study that was protocol driven with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria and secure online data collection in a district general hospital between July 2018 and June 2019. A weekly dedicated theatre slot was allocated for this list. RESULTS: Of the 143 referred for HGS, 86 (60%) underwent ELC which included 60 (70%) women. Age, ASA and body mass index was 54* (18–85) years, II* (I-III) and 27* (20–54), respectively. 86 included 46 (53%), 19 (22%), 19 (22%) and 2 (3%) patients presenting with acute calculus cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, biliary colic, and acalculus cholecystitis, respectively. 85 (99%) underwent LC with a single conversion. Grade of surgical difficulty, duration of surgery and post-operative stay was 2* (1–4) 68* (30–240) min and 0* (0–13) day, respectively. Eight (9%) required senior surgical input with no intra-operative complications and 2 (2%) 30-day readmissions. One was post-operative subhepatic collection that recovered uneventfully and the second was pancreatitis, imaging was clear requiring no further intervention. CONCLUSION: In the current climate of NHS financial crunch, COVID pandemic and significant pressure on inpatient beds: Safe and cost-effective HGS can be provided by the EGS with input from upper GI/HPB surgeons (when required) with acceptable morbidity and a satisfactory outcome. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8830581/ /pubmed/33885031 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_271_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Imtiaz, Mohammad Prakash, Samip Iqbal, Sara Fernandes, Roland Shah, Ankur Shrestha, Ashish K. Basu, Sanjoy ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible? |
title | ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible? |
title_full | ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible? |
title_fullStr | ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible? |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible? |
title_short | ‘Hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: Is this safe and feasible? |
title_sort | ‘hot gall bladder service’ by emergency general surgeons: is this safe and feasible? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33885031 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmas.JMAS_271_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imtiazmohammad hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible AT prakashsamip hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible AT iqbalsara hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible AT fernandesroland hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible AT shahankur hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible AT shresthaashishk hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible AT basusanjoy hotgallbladderservicebyemergencygeneralsurgeonsisthissafeandfeasible |