Cargando…
Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning
External peak power in the countermovement jump is frequently used to monitor athlete training. The gold standard method uses force platforms, but they are unsuitable for field-based testing. However, alternatives based on jump flight time or Newtonian methods applied to inertial sensor data have no...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263846 |
_version_ | 1784648309980266496 |
---|---|
author | White, Mark G. E. Bezodis, Neil E. Neville, Jonathon Summers, Huw Rees, Paul |
author_facet | White, Mark G. E. Bezodis, Neil E. Neville, Jonathon Summers, Huw Rees, Paul |
author_sort | White, Mark G. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | External peak power in the countermovement jump is frequently used to monitor athlete training. The gold standard method uses force platforms, but they are unsuitable for field-based testing. However, alternatives based on jump flight time or Newtonian methods applied to inertial sensor data have not been sufficiently accurate for athlete monitoring. Instead, we developed a machine learning model based on characteristic features (functional principal components) extracted from a single body-worn accelerometer. Data were collected from 69 male and female athletes at recreational, club or national levels, who performed 696 jumps in total. We considered vertical countermovement jumps (with and without arm swing), sensor anatomical locations, machine learning models and whether to use resultant or triaxial signals. Using a novel surrogate model optimisation procedure, we obtained the lowest errors with a support vector machine when using the resultant signal from a lower back sensor in jumps without arm swing. This model had a peak power RMSE of 2.3 W·kg(-1) (5.1% of the mean), estimated using nested cross validation and supported by an independent holdout test (2.0 W·kg(-1)). This error is lower than in previous studies, although it is not yet sufficiently accurate for a field-based method. Our results demonstrate that functional data representations work well in machine learning by reducing model complexity in applications where signals are aligned in time. Our optimisation procedure also was shown to be robust can be used in wider applications with low-cost, noisy objective functions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8830617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88306172022-02-11 Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning White, Mark G. E. Bezodis, Neil E. Neville, Jonathon Summers, Huw Rees, Paul PLoS One Research Article External peak power in the countermovement jump is frequently used to monitor athlete training. The gold standard method uses force platforms, but they are unsuitable for field-based testing. However, alternatives based on jump flight time or Newtonian methods applied to inertial sensor data have not been sufficiently accurate for athlete monitoring. Instead, we developed a machine learning model based on characteristic features (functional principal components) extracted from a single body-worn accelerometer. Data were collected from 69 male and female athletes at recreational, club or national levels, who performed 696 jumps in total. We considered vertical countermovement jumps (with and without arm swing), sensor anatomical locations, machine learning models and whether to use resultant or triaxial signals. Using a novel surrogate model optimisation procedure, we obtained the lowest errors with a support vector machine when using the resultant signal from a lower back sensor in jumps without arm swing. This model had a peak power RMSE of 2.3 W·kg(-1) (5.1% of the mean), estimated using nested cross validation and supported by an independent holdout test (2.0 W·kg(-1)). This error is lower than in previous studies, although it is not yet sufficiently accurate for a field-based method. Our results demonstrate that functional data representations work well in machine learning by reducing model complexity in applications where signals are aligned in time. Our optimisation procedure also was shown to be robust can be used in wider applications with low-cost, noisy objective functions. Public Library of Science 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8830617/ /pubmed/35143555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263846 Text en © 2022 White et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article White, Mark G. E. Bezodis, Neil E. Neville, Jonathon Summers, Huw Rees, Paul Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning |
title | Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning |
title_full | Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning |
title_fullStr | Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning |
title_short | Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning |
title_sort | determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263846 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitemarkge determiningjumpingperformancefromasinglebodywornaccelerometerusingmachinelearning AT bezodisneile determiningjumpingperformancefromasinglebodywornaccelerometerusingmachinelearning AT nevillejonathon determiningjumpingperformancefromasinglebodywornaccelerometerusingmachinelearning AT summershuw determiningjumpingperformancefromasinglebodywornaccelerometerusingmachinelearning AT reespaul determiningjumpingperformancefromasinglebodywornaccelerometerusingmachinelearning |