Cargando…

Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning

External peak power in the countermovement jump is frequently used to monitor athlete training. The gold standard method uses force platforms, but they are unsuitable for field-based testing. However, alternatives based on jump flight time or Newtonian methods applied to inertial sensor data have no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Mark G. E., Bezodis, Neil E., Neville, Jonathon, Summers, Huw, Rees, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263846
_version_ 1784648309980266496
author White, Mark G. E.
Bezodis, Neil E.
Neville, Jonathon
Summers, Huw
Rees, Paul
author_facet White, Mark G. E.
Bezodis, Neil E.
Neville, Jonathon
Summers, Huw
Rees, Paul
author_sort White, Mark G. E.
collection PubMed
description External peak power in the countermovement jump is frequently used to monitor athlete training. The gold standard method uses force platforms, but they are unsuitable for field-based testing. However, alternatives based on jump flight time or Newtonian methods applied to inertial sensor data have not been sufficiently accurate for athlete monitoring. Instead, we developed a machine learning model based on characteristic features (functional principal components) extracted from a single body-worn accelerometer. Data were collected from 69 male and female athletes at recreational, club or national levels, who performed 696 jumps in total. We considered vertical countermovement jumps (with and without arm swing), sensor anatomical locations, machine learning models and whether to use resultant or triaxial signals. Using a novel surrogate model optimisation procedure, we obtained the lowest errors with a support vector machine when using the resultant signal from a lower back sensor in jumps without arm swing. This model had a peak power RMSE of 2.3 W·kg(-1) (5.1% of the mean), estimated using nested cross validation and supported by an independent holdout test (2.0 W·kg(-1)). This error is lower than in previous studies, although it is not yet sufficiently accurate for a field-based method. Our results demonstrate that functional data representations work well in machine learning by reducing model complexity in applications where signals are aligned in time. Our optimisation procedure also was shown to be robust can be used in wider applications with low-cost, noisy objective functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8830617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88306172022-02-11 Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning White, Mark G. E. Bezodis, Neil E. Neville, Jonathon Summers, Huw Rees, Paul PLoS One Research Article External peak power in the countermovement jump is frequently used to monitor athlete training. The gold standard method uses force platforms, but they are unsuitable for field-based testing. However, alternatives based on jump flight time or Newtonian methods applied to inertial sensor data have not been sufficiently accurate for athlete monitoring. Instead, we developed a machine learning model based on characteristic features (functional principal components) extracted from a single body-worn accelerometer. Data were collected from 69 male and female athletes at recreational, club or national levels, who performed 696 jumps in total. We considered vertical countermovement jumps (with and without arm swing), sensor anatomical locations, machine learning models and whether to use resultant or triaxial signals. Using a novel surrogate model optimisation procedure, we obtained the lowest errors with a support vector machine when using the resultant signal from a lower back sensor in jumps without arm swing. This model had a peak power RMSE of 2.3 W·kg(-1) (5.1% of the mean), estimated using nested cross validation and supported by an independent holdout test (2.0 W·kg(-1)). This error is lower than in previous studies, although it is not yet sufficiently accurate for a field-based method. Our results demonstrate that functional data representations work well in machine learning by reducing model complexity in applications where signals are aligned in time. Our optimisation procedure also was shown to be robust can be used in wider applications with low-cost, noisy objective functions. Public Library of Science 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8830617/ /pubmed/35143555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263846 Text en © 2022 White et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
White, Mark G. E.
Bezodis, Neil E.
Neville, Jonathon
Summers, Huw
Rees, Paul
Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning
title Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning
title_full Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning
title_fullStr Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning
title_short Determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning
title_sort determining jumping performance from a single body-worn accelerometer using machine learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263846
work_keys_str_mv AT whitemarkge determiningjumpingperformancefromasinglebodywornaccelerometerusingmachinelearning
AT bezodisneile determiningjumpingperformancefromasinglebodywornaccelerometerusingmachinelearning
AT nevillejonathon determiningjumpingperformancefromasinglebodywornaccelerometerusingmachinelearning
AT summershuw determiningjumpingperformancefromasinglebodywornaccelerometerusingmachinelearning
AT reespaul determiningjumpingperformancefromasinglebodywornaccelerometerusingmachinelearning