Cargando…

Comparative cohort study of Duhamel and endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease

BACKGROUND: There are limited data available to compare outcomes between surgical approaches for Hirschsprung’s disease. Duhamel and endorectal pull-through (ERPT) are two of the most common procedures performed worldwide. METHODS: Objective outcomes were compared between contemporary cohorts (aged...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davidson, Joseph R., Mutanen, Annika, Salli, Malla, Kyrklund, Kristiina, De Coppi, Paolo, Curry, Joe, Eaton, Simon, Pakarinen, Mikko P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab143
_version_ 1784648343726587904
author Davidson, Joseph R.
Mutanen, Annika
Salli, Malla
Kyrklund, Kristiina
De Coppi, Paolo
Curry, Joe
Eaton, Simon
Pakarinen, Mikko P.
author_facet Davidson, Joseph R.
Mutanen, Annika
Salli, Malla
Kyrklund, Kristiina
De Coppi, Paolo
Curry, Joe
Eaton, Simon
Pakarinen, Mikko P.
author_sort Davidson, Joseph R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are limited data available to compare outcomes between surgical approaches for Hirschsprung’s disease. Duhamel and endorectal pull-through (ERPT) are two of the most common procedures performed worldwide. METHODS: Objective outcomes were compared between contemporary cohorts (aged 4–32 years) after Duhamel or ERPT using case–control methodology. Data were collected using prospectively administered standardized questionnaires on bowel and bladder function and quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Short form 36 and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index). Patients were compared in two age groups (18 years and younger and older than 18 years) and reference made to normative control data. Multivariable analysis explored factors associated with poor outcomes. RESULTS: Cohorts were well matched by demographics, disease characteristics and incidence of postoperative complications (120 patients who underwent Duhamel versus 57 patients who had ERPT). Bowel function scores were similar between groups. Patients who underwent Duhamel demonstrated worse constipation and inferior faecal awareness scores (P < 0.01 for both age groups). Recurrent postoperative enterocolitis was significantly more common after ERPT (34 versus 6 per cent; odds ratio 15.56 (95 per cent c.i. 6.19 to 39.24; P < 0.0001)). On multivariable analysis, poor bowel outcome was the only factor significantly associated with poor urinary outcome (adjusted odds ratio 6.66 (95 per cent c.i. 1.74 to 25.50; P = 0.006)) and was significantly associated with markedly reduced quality of life (QoL) in all instruments used (P < 0.001 for all). There were no associations between QoL measures and pull-through technique. CONCLUSION: Outcomes from Duhamel and ERPT are good in the majority of cases, with comparable bowel function scores. Constipation and impaired faecal awareness were more prevalent after Duhamel, with differences sustained in adulthood. Recurrent enterocolitis was significantly more prevalent after ERPT. Clustering of poor QoL and poor functional outcomes were observed in both cohorts, with seemingly little effect by choice of surgical procedure in terms of QoL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8830754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88307542022-02-14 Comparative cohort study of Duhamel and endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease Davidson, Joseph R. Mutanen, Annika Salli, Malla Kyrklund, Kristiina De Coppi, Paolo Curry, Joe Eaton, Simon Pakarinen, Mikko P. BJS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: There are limited data available to compare outcomes between surgical approaches for Hirschsprung’s disease. Duhamel and endorectal pull-through (ERPT) are two of the most common procedures performed worldwide. METHODS: Objective outcomes were compared between contemporary cohorts (aged 4–32 years) after Duhamel or ERPT using case–control methodology. Data were collected using prospectively administered standardized questionnaires on bowel and bladder function and quality of life (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, Short form 36 and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index). Patients were compared in two age groups (18 years and younger and older than 18 years) and reference made to normative control data. Multivariable analysis explored factors associated with poor outcomes. RESULTS: Cohorts were well matched by demographics, disease characteristics and incidence of postoperative complications (120 patients who underwent Duhamel versus 57 patients who had ERPT). Bowel function scores were similar between groups. Patients who underwent Duhamel demonstrated worse constipation and inferior faecal awareness scores (P < 0.01 for both age groups). Recurrent postoperative enterocolitis was significantly more common after ERPT (34 versus 6 per cent; odds ratio 15.56 (95 per cent c.i. 6.19 to 39.24; P < 0.0001)). On multivariable analysis, poor bowel outcome was the only factor significantly associated with poor urinary outcome (adjusted odds ratio 6.66 (95 per cent c.i. 1.74 to 25.50; P = 0.006)) and was significantly associated with markedly reduced quality of life (QoL) in all instruments used (P < 0.001 for all). There were no associations between QoL measures and pull-through technique. CONCLUSION: Outcomes from Duhamel and ERPT are good in the majority of cases, with comparable bowel function scores. Constipation and impaired faecal awareness were more prevalent after Duhamel, with differences sustained in adulthood. Recurrent enterocolitis was significantly more prevalent after ERPT. Clustering of poor QoL and poor functional outcomes were observed in both cohorts, with seemingly little effect by choice of surgical procedure in terms of QoL. Oxford University Press 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8830754/ /pubmed/35143630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab143 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Davidson, Joseph R.
Mutanen, Annika
Salli, Malla
Kyrklund, Kristiina
De Coppi, Paolo
Curry, Joe
Eaton, Simon
Pakarinen, Mikko P.
Comparative cohort study of Duhamel and endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease
title Comparative cohort study of Duhamel and endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease
title_full Comparative cohort study of Duhamel and endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease
title_fullStr Comparative cohort study of Duhamel and endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparative cohort study of Duhamel and endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease
title_short Comparative cohort study of Duhamel and endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease
title_sort comparative cohort study of duhamel and endorectal pull-through for hirschsprung’s disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab143
work_keys_str_mv AT davidsonjosephr comparativecohortstudyofduhamelandendorectalpullthroughforhirschsprungsdisease
AT mutanenannika comparativecohortstudyofduhamelandendorectalpullthroughforhirschsprungsdisease
AT sallimalla comparativecohortstudyofduhamelandendorectalpullthroughforhirschsprungsdisease
AT kyrklundkristiina comparativecohortstudyofduhamelandendorectalpullthroughforhirschsprungsdisease
AT decoppipaolo comparativecohortstudyofduhamelandendorectalpullthroughforhirschsprungsdisease
AT curryjoe comparativecohortstudyofduhamelandendorectalpullthroughforhirschsprungsdisease
AT eatonsimon comparativecohortstudyofduhamelandendorectalpullthroughforhirschsprungsdisease
AT pakarinenmikkop comparativecohortstudyofduhamelandendorectalpullthroughforhirschsprungsdisease