Cargando…

There is No “Axillary Tail”: Rethinking the Assumption of James Spence

Widely quoted, “the axillary tail of Spence” refers to a contiguous extension of adipose angling superolaterally from the primary breast into the axilla. Described anecdotally in 1871, the “tail of Spence” has been considered important to the fields of general surgery, oncology, plastic surgery, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teplica, David, Cooney, Emmett, Jeffers, Eileen, Sayers, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004086
_version_ 1784648362441572352
author Teplica, David
Cooney, Emmett
Jeffers, Eileen
Sayers, Michael
author_facet Teplica, David
Cooney, Emmett
Jeffers, Eileen
Sayers, Michael
author_sort Teplica, David
collection PubMed
description Widely quoted, “the axillary tail of Spence” refers to a contiguous extension of adipose angling superolaterally from the primary breast into the axilla. Described anecdotally in 1871, the “tail of Spence” has been considered important to the fields of general surgery, oncology, plastic surgery, and anatomy ever since. Despite the ubiquitous presence of the concept in literature, clinical discussions, and educational settings, we argue against the very existence of Spence’s “tail.” While pinch-testing and topographically mapping 316 consecutive patients in preparation for breast and gynecomastia surgery, we found a consistent pattern of focal fat mounds without continuity between breast and axilla. The absence of an uninterrupted superolateral tail was reaffirmed while analyzing 20 research participants who were pinch-tested with calipers and topographically mapped, specifically to define fat pad anatomy. We documented that the axillary breast mound was always distinct from the primary breast and that all women and many men had an additional “lateral chest wall tail” that never angled toward the axilla. In most, rolling the shoulder girdle anteriorly created a visible groove between the axillary mound and the primary breast, with little or no pinchable fat beneath that crease. With all deference to Spence, we have established that the outer half of the chest is consistently defined by three focal adipose structures—an axillary mound, the primary breast mound, and a previously unnamed “lateral chest wall tail”—with no anatomic evidence of an “axillary tail” of fat extending superolaterally from breast to axilla.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8830835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88308352022-02-14 There is No “Axillary Tail”: Rethinking the Assumption of James Spence Teplica, David Cooney, Emmett Jeffers, Eileen Sayers, Michael Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Widely quoted, “the axillary tail of Spence” refers to a contiguous extension of adipose angling superolaterally from the primary breast into the axilla. Described anecdotally in 1871, the “tail of Spence” has been considered important to the fields of general surgery, oncology, plastic surgery, and anatomy ever since. Despite the ubiquitous presence of the concept in literature, clinical discussions, and educational settings, we argue against the very existence of Spence’s “tail.” While pinch-testing and topographically mapping 316 consecutive patients in preparation for breast and gynecomastia surgery, we found a consistent pattern of focal fat mounds without continuity between breast and axilla. The absence of an uninterrupted superolateral tail was reaffirmed while analyzing 20 research participants who were pinch-tested with calipers and topographically mapped, specifically to define fat pad anatomy. We documented that the axillary breast mound was always distinct from the primary breast and that all women and many men had an additional “lateral chest wall tail” that never angled toward the axilla. In most, rolling the shoulder girdle anteriorly created a visible groove between the axillary mound and the primary breast, with little or no pinchable fat beneath that crease. With all deference to Spence, we have established that the outer half of the chest is consistently defined by three focal adipose structures—an axillary mound, the primary breast mound, and a previously unnamed “lateral chest wall tail”—with no anatomic evidence of an “axillary tail” of fat extending superolaterally from breast to axilla. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8830835/ /pubmed/35169519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004086 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast
Teplica, David
Cooney, Emmett
Jeffers, Eileen
Sayers, Michael
There is No “Axillary Tail”: Rethinking the Assumption of James Spence
title There is No “Axillary Tail”: Rethinking the Assumption of James Spence
title_full There is No “Axillary Tail”: Rethinking the Assumption of James Spence
title_fullStr There is No “Axillary Tail”: Rethinking the Assumption of James Spence
title_full_unstemmed There is No “Axillary Tail”: Rethinking the Assumption of James Spence
title_short There is No “Axillary Tail”: Rethinking the Assumption of James Spence
title_sort there is no “axillary tail”: rethinking the assumption of james spence
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8830835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004086
work_keys_str_mv AT teplicadavid thereisnoaxillarytailrethinkingtheassumptionofjamesspence
AT cooneyemmett thereisnoaxillarytailrethinkingtheassumptionofjamesspence
AT jefferseileen thereisnoaxillarytailrethinkingtheassumptionofjamesspence
AT sayersmichael thereisnoaxillarytailrethinkingtheassumptionofjamesspence