Cargando…
Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, performance, and complications of a non-surgical, minimally-invasive procedure of deep contraceptive implant removal under continuous ultrasound guidance. METHODS: The ultrasound-guided procedure consisted of local anesthesia using lid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34651210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08263-4 |
_version_ | 1784648464940924928 |
---|---|
author | Jacques, Thibaut Brienne, Charlotte Henry, Simon Baffet, Hortense Giraudet, Géraldine Demondion, Xavier Cotten, Anne |
author_facet | Jacques, Thibaut Brienne, Charlotte Henry, Simon Baffet, Hortense Giraudet, Géraldine Demondion, Xavier Cotten, Anne |
author_sort | Jacques, Thibaut |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, performance, and complications of a non-surgical, minimally-invasive procedure of deep contraceptive implant removal under continuous ultrasound guidance. METHODS: The ultrasound-guided procedure consisted of local anesthesia using lidocaine chlorhydrate 1% (10 mg/mL) with a 21-G needle, followed by hydrodissection using NaCl 0.9% (9 mg/mL) and implant extraction using a Hartmann grasping microforceps. The parameters studied were the implant localization, success and complication rates, pain throughout the intervention, volumes of lidocaïne and NaCl used, duration of the procedure, and size of the incision. Between November 2019 and January 2021, 45 patients were referred to the musculoskeletal radiology department for ultrasound-guided removal of a deep contraceptive implant and were all retrospectively included. RESULTS: All implants were successfully removed en bloc (100%). The mean incision size was 2.7 ± 0.5 mm. The mean duration of the extraction procedure was 7.7 ± 6.3 min. There were no major complications (infection, nerve, or vessel damage). As a minor complication, 21 patients (46.7%) reported a benign superficial skin ecchymosis at the puncture site, spontaneously regressing in less than 1 week. The procedure was very well-tolerated, with low pain rating throughout (1.0 ± 1.5/10 during implant extraction). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance alone is feasible, effective, and safe. In the present cohort, all implants were successfully removed, whatever the location, with short procedural time, small incision size, low pain levels, and no significant complications. This procedure could become a gold standard in this indication. KEY POINTS: • Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance alone is feasible, which led to a success rate of 100% whatever the location (even close to neurovascular structures), with only a small skin incision (2.7 ± 0.5 mm). • The procedure was safe, quick, without any major complications, and very well tolerated in terms of pain. • This minimally invasive ultrasound-guided procedure could become the future gold standard for the removal of deep contraceptive implants, as an alternative to surgical extraction, even for implants in difficult locations such as subfascial ones or those close to neurovascular structures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08263-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8831252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88312522022-02-23 Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe Jacques, Thibaut Brienne, Charlotte Henry, Simon Baffet, Hortense Giraudet, Géraldine Demondion, Xavier Cotten, Anne Eur Radiol Interventional OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility, performance, and complications of a non-surgical, minimally-invasive procedure of deep contraceptive implant removal under continuous ultrasound guidance. METHODS: The ultrasound-guided procedure consisted of local anesthesia using lidocaine chlorhydrate 1% (10 mg/mL) with a 21-G needle, followed by hydrodissection using NaCl 0.9% (9 mg/mL) and implant extraction using a Hartmann grasping microforceps. The parameters studied were the implant localization, success and complication rates, pain throughout the intervention, volumes of lidocaïne and NaCl used, duration of the procedure, and size of the incision. Between November 2019 and January 2021, 45 patients were referred to the musculoskeletal radiology department for ultrasound-guided removal of a deep contraceptive implant and were all retrospectively included. RESULTS: All implants were successfully removed en bloc (100%). The mean incision size was 2.7 ± 0.5 mm. The mean duration of the extraction procedure was 7.7 ± 6.3 min. There were no major complications (infection, nerve, or vessel damage). As a minor complication, 21 patients (46.7%) reported a benign superficial skin ecchymosis at the puncture site, spontaneously regressing in less than 1 week. The procedure was very well-tolerated, with low pain rating throughout (1.0 ± 1.5/10 during implant extraction). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance alone is feasible, effective, and safe. In the present cohort, all implants were successfully removed, whatever the location, with short procedural time, small incision size, low pain levels, and no significant complications. This procedure could become a gold standard in this indication. KEY POINTS: • Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance alone is feasible, which led to a success rate of 100% whatever the location (even close to neurovascular structures), with only a small skin incision (2.7 ± 0.5 mm). • The procedure was safe, quick, without any major complications, and very well tolerated in terms of pain. • This minimally invasive ultrasound-guided procedure could become the future gold standard for the removal of deep contraceptive implants, as an alternative to surgical extraction, even for implants in difficult locations such as subfascial ones or those close to neurovascular structures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08263-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8831252/ /pubmed/34651210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08263-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Interventional Jacques, Thibaut Brienne, Charlotte Henry, Simon Baffet, Hortense Giraudet, Géraldine Demondion, Xavier Cotten, Anne Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe |
title | Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe |
title_full | Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe |
title_short | Minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe |
title_sort | minimally invasive removal of deep contraceptive implants under continuous ultrasound guidance is effective, quick, and safe |
topic | Interventional |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34651210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08263-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacquesthibaut minimallyinvasiveremovalofdeepcontraceptiveimplantsundercontinuousultrasoundguidanceiseffectivequickandsafe AT briennecharlotte minimallyinvasiveremovalofdeepcontraceptiveimplantsundercontinuousultrasoundguidanceiseffectivequickandsafe AT henrysimon minimallyinvasiveremovalofdeepcontraceptiveimplantsundercontinuousultrasoundguidanceiseffectivequickandsafe AT baffethortense minimallyinvasiveremovalofdeepcontraceptiveimplantsundercontinuousultrasoundguidanceiseffectivequickandsafe AT giraudetgeraldine minimallyinvasiveremovalofdeepcontraceptiveimplantsundercontinuousultrasoundguidanceiseffectivequickandsafe AT demondionxavier minimallyinvasiveremovalofdeepcontraceptiveimplantsundercontinuousultrasoundguidanceiseffectivequickandsafe AT cottenanne minimallyinvasiveremovalofdeepcontraceptiveimplantsundercontinuousultrasoundguidanceiseffectivequickandsafe |