Cargando…
Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction
BACKGROUND: Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) due to pelvic malignancies is challenging for endourological management and carries high failure rates for retrograde cystoscopic ureteric stenting. METHODS: We adopted Galdakao-modified Valdivia (GMV) position in the management of MUO in an operating...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03109-4 |
_version_ | 1784648466269470720 |
---|---|
author | Emam, Ahmed Elmoazen, Mohamed Shabayek, Mohamed Zriek, Amr M. Gad, Hany Hamed |
author_facet | Emam, Ahmed Elmoazen, Mohamed Shabayek, Mohamed Zriek, Amr M. Gad, Hany Hamed |
author_sort | Emam, Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) due to pelvic malignancies is challenging for endourological management and carries high failure rates for retrograde cystoscopic ureteric stenting. METHODS: We adopted Galdakao-modified Valdivia (GMV) position in the management of MUO in an operating room equipped with a C-arm fluoroscopy unit and an ultrasound device. We prospectively studied the added value of this approach in 50 cases who failed retrograde ureteric stenting. RESULTS: Thirty-seven (74%) cases were done under a high level of spinal anesthesia. Mean operative time was 62 min. Antegrade ureteric stenting succeeded in 45/50 (90%) patients who failed retrograde ureteric stenting. GMV position facilitated simultaneous retrograde and antegrade management of MUO. Eight patients (16%) underwent auxiliary cystoscopic procedures to reduce the mass over the ureteric orifice (UO) guided by antegrade methylene blue or over a probing antegrade guidewire. Nephrostomy tube was inserted in the same setting in 16/50 (32%) cases. Antegrade flow of contrast to the bladder (P < 0.001) and ureteric kinks rather than tight stenosis or infiltration of UO (P = 0.014) were significantly associated with the success of antegrade ureteric stenting. No major complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: GMV position is an ideal choice for management of MUO as it allows simultaneous access to the lower and the upper urinary systems to accomplish ureteric stenting either in a retrograde or an antegrade fashion as well as the ability to insert a nephrostomy tube in the same setting, thus shortening the inpatient care and this should be the standard of care in cases with MUO. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8831257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88312572022-02-23 Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction Emam, Ahmed Elmoazen, Mohamed Shabayek, Mohamed Zriek, Amr M. Gad, Hany Hamed Int Urol Nephrol Urology - Original Paper BACKGROUND: Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) due to pelvic malignancies is challenging for endourological management and carries high failure rates for retrograde cystoscopic ureteric stenting. METHODS: We adopted Galdakao-modified Valdivia (GMV) position in the management of MUO in an operating room equipped with a C-arm fluoroscopy unit and an ultrasound device. We prospectively studied the added value of this approach in 50 cases who failed retrograde ureteric stenting. RESULTS: Thirty-seven (74%) cases were done under a high level of spinal anesthesia. Mean operative time was 62 min. Antegrade ureteric stenting succeeded in 45/50 (90%) patients who failed retrograde ureteric stenting. GMV position facilitated simultaneous retrograde and antegrade management of MUO. Eight patients (16%) underwent auxiliary cystoscopic procedures to reduce the mass over the ureteric orifice (UO) guided by antegrade methylene blue or over a probing antegrade guidewire. Nephrostomy tube was inserted in the same setting in 16/50 (32%) cases. Antegrade flow of contrast to the bladder (P < 0.001) and ureteric kinks rather than tight stenosis or infiltration of UO (P = 0.014) were significantly associated with the success of antegrade ureteric stenting. No major complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: GMV position is an ideal choice for management of MUO as it allows simultaneous access to the lower and the upper urinary systems to accomplish ureteric stenting either in a retrograde or an antegrade fashion as well as the ability to insert a nephrostomy tube in the same setting, thus shortening the inpatient care and this should be the standard of care in cases with MUO. Springer Netherlands 2022-01-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8831257/ /pubmed/35084651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03109-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Urology - Original Paper Emam, Ahmed Elmoazen, Mohamed Shabayek, Mohamed Zriek, Amr M. Gad, Hany Hamed Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction |
title | Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction |
title_full | Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction |
title_short | Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction |
title_sort | evaluation of galdakao-modified valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction |
topic | Urology - Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03109-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emamahmed evaluationofgaldakaomodifiedvaldiviapositioninendoscopicmanagementofmalignanturetericobstruction AT elmoazenmohamed evaluationofgaldakaomodifiedvaldiviapositioninendoscopicmanagementofmalignanturetericobstruction AT shabayekmohamed evaluationofgaldakaomodifiedvaldiviapositioninendoscopicmanagementofmalignanturetericobstruction AT zriekamrm evaluationofgaldakaomodifiedvaldiviapositioninendoscopicmanagementofmalignanturetericobstruction AT gadhanyhamed evaluationofgaldakaomodifiedvaldiviapositioninendoscopicmanagementofmalignanturetericobstruction |