Cargando…

Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction

BACKGROUND: Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) due to pelvic malignancies is challenging for endourological management and carries high failure rates for retrograde cystoscopic ureteric stenting. METHODS: We adopted Galdakao-modified Valdivia (GMV) position in the management of MUO in an operating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emam, Ahmed, Elmoazen, Mohamed, Shabayek, Mohamed, Zriek, Amr M., Gad, Hany Hamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03109-4
_version_ 1784648466269470720
author Emam, Ahmed
Elmoazen, Mohamed
Shabayek, Mohamed
Zriek, Amr M.
Gad, Hany Hamed
author_facet Emam, Ahmed
Elmoazen, Mohamed
Shabayek, Mohamed
Zriek, Amr M.
Gad, Hany Hamed
author_sort Emam, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) due to pelvic malignancies is challenging for endourological management and carries high failure rates for retrograde cystoscopic ureteric stenting. METHODS: We adopted Galdakao-modified Valdivia (GMV) position in the management of MUO in an operating room equipped with a C-arm fluoroscopy unit and an ultrasound device. We prospectively studied the added value of this approach in 50 cases who failed retrograde ureteric stenting. RESULTS: Thirty-seven (74%) cases were done under a high level of spinal anesthesia. Mean operative time was 62 min. Antegrade ureteric stenting succeeded in 45/50 (90%) patients who failed retrograde ureteric stenting. GMV position facilitated simultaneous retrograde and antegrade management of MUO. Eight patients (16%) underwent auxiliary cystoscopic procedures to reduce the mass over the ureteric orifice (UO) guided by antegrade methylene blue or over a probing antegrade guidewire. Nephrostomy tube was inserted in the same setting in 16/50 (32%) cases. Antegrade flow of contrast to the bladder (P < 0.001) and ureteric kinks rather than tight stenosis or infiltration of UO (P = 0.014) were significantly associated with the success of antegrade ureteric stenting. No major complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: GMV position is an ideal choice for management of MUO as it allows simultaneous access to the lower and the upper urinary systems to accomplish ureteric stenting either in a retrograde or an antegrade fashion as well as the ability to insert a nephrostomy tube in the same setting, thus shortening the inpatient care and this should be the standard of care in cases with MUO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8831257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88312572022-02-23 Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction Emam, Ahmed Elmoazen, Mohamed Shabayek, Mohamed Zriek, Amr M. Gad, Hany Hamed Int Urol Nephrol Urology - Original Paper BACKGROUND: Malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) due to pelvic malignancies is challenging for endourological management and carries high failure rates for retrograde cystoscopic ureteric stenting. METHODS: We adopted Galdakao-modified Valdivia (GMV) position in the management of MUO in an operating room equipped with a C-arm fluoroscopy unit and an ultrasound device. We prospectively studied the added value of this approach in 50 cases who failed retrograde ureteric stenting. RESULTS: Thirty-seven (74%) cases were done under a high level of spinal anesthesia. Mean operative time was 62 min. Antegrade ureteric stenting succeeded in 45/50 (90%) patients who failed retrograde ureteric stenting. GMV position facilitated simultaneous retrograde and antegrade management of MUO. Eight patients (16%) underwent auxiliary cystoscopic procedures to reduce the mass over the ureteric orifice (UO) guided by antegrade methylene blue or over a probing antegrade guidewire. Nephrostomy tube was inserted in the same setting in 16/50 (32%) cases. Antegrade flow of contrast to the bladder (P < 0.001) and ureteric kinks rather than tight stenosis or infiltration of UO (P = 0.014) were significantly associated with the success of antegrade ureteric stenting. No major complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: GMV position is an ideal choice for management of MUO as it allows simultaneous access to the lower and the upper urinary systems to accomplish ureteric stenting either in a retrograde or an antegrade fashion as well as the ability to insert a nephrostomy tube in the same setting, thus shortening the inpatient care and this should be the standard of care in cases with MUO. Springer Netherlands 2022-01-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8831257/ /pubmed/35084651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03109-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Urology - Original Paper
Emam, Ahmed
Elmoazen, Mohamed
Shabayek, Mohamed
Zriek, Amr M.
Gad, Hany Hamed
Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction
title Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction
title_full Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction
title_fullStr Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction
title_short Evaluation of Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction
title_sort evaluation of galdakao-modified valdivia position in endoscopic management of malignant ureteric obstruction
topic Urology - Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03109-4
work_keys_str_mv AT emamahmed evaluationofgaldakaomodifiedvaldiviapositioninendoscopicmanagementofmalignanturetericobstruction
AT elmoazenmohamed evaluationofgaldakaomodifiedvaldiviapositioninendoscopicmanagementofmalignanturetericobstruction
AT shabayekmohamed evaluationofgaldakaomodifiedvaldiviapositioninendoscopicmanagementofmalignanturetericobstruction
AT zriekamrm evaluationofgaldakaomodifiedvaldiviapositioninendoscopicmanagementofmalignanturetericobstruction
AT gadhanyhamed evaluationofgaldakaomodifiedvaldiviapositioninendoscopicmanagementofmalignanturetericobstruction