Cargando…

Ultrashort echo time MRI of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast T1w MRI sequences

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic value of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the lung versus the gold standard computed tomography (CT) and two T1-weighted MRI sequences in children. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with proven oncologic disease (14 male, 9 female; me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renz, Diane M., Herrmann, Karl-Heinz, Kraemer, Martin, Boettcher, Joachim, Waginger, Matthias, Krueger, Paul-Christian, Pfeil, Alexander, Streitparth, Florian, Kentouche, Karim, Gruhn, Bernd, Mainz, Jochen G., Stenzel, Martin, Teichgraeber, Ulf K., Reichenbach, Juergen R., Mentzel, Hans-Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34668994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08236-7
_version_ 1784648467679805440
author Renz, Diane M.
Herrmann, Karl-Heinz
Kraemer, Martin
Boettcher, Joachim
Waginger, Matthias
Krueger, Paul-Christian
Pfeil, Alexander
Streitparth, Florian
Kentouche, Karim
Gruhn, Bernd
Mainz, Jochen G.
Stenzel, Martin
Teichgraeber, Ulf K.
Reichenbach, Juergen R.
Mentzel, Hans-Joachim
author_facet Renz, Diane M.
Herrmann, Karl-Heinz
Kraemer, Martin
Boettcher, Joachim
Waginger, Matthias
Krueger, Paul-Christian
Pfeil, Alexander
Streitparth, Florian
Kentouche, Karim
Gruhn, Bernd
Mainz, Jochen G.
Stenzel, Martin
Teichgraeber, Ulf K.
Reichenbach, Juergen R.
Mentzel, Hans-Joachim
author_sort Renz, Diane M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic value of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the lung versus the gold standard computed tomography (CT) and two T1-weighted MRI sequences in children. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with proven oncologic disease (14 male, 9 female; mean age 9.0 + / − 5.4 years) received 35 low-dose CT and MRI examinations of the lung. The MRI protocol (1.5-T) included the following post-contrast sequences: two-dimensional (2D) incoherent gradient echo (GRE; acquisition with breath-hold), 3D volume interpolated GRE (breath-hold), and 3D high-resolution radial UTE sequences (performed during free-breathing). Images were evaluated by considering image quality as well as distinct diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and parenchymal areal opacities with consideration of sizes and characterisations. RESULTS: The UTE technique showed significantly higher overall image quality, better sharpness, and fewer artefacts than both other sequences. On CT, 110 pulmonary nodules with a mean diameter of 4.9 + / − 2.9 mm were detected. UTE imaging resulted in a significantly higher detection rate compared to both other sequences (p < 0.01): 76.4% (84 of 110 nodules) for UTE versus 60.9% (67 of 110) for incoherent GRE and 62.7% (69 of 110) for volume interpolated GRE sequences. The detection of parenchymal areal opacities by the UTE technique was also significantly higher with a rate of 93.3% (42 of 45 opacities) versus 77.8% (35 of 45) for 2D GRE and 80.0% (36 of 45) for 3D GRE sequences (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The UTE technique for lung MRI is favourable in children with generally high diagnostic performance compared to standard T1-weighted sequences as well as CT. Key Points • Due to the possible acquisition during free-breathing of the patients, the UTE MRI sequence for the lung is favourable in children. • The UTE technique reaches higher overall image quality, better sharpness, and lower artefacts, but not higher contrast compared to standard post-contrast T1-weighted sequences. • In comparison to the gold standard chest CT, the detection rate of small pulmonary nodules small nodules ≤ 4 mm and subtle parenchymal areal opacities is higher with the UTE imaging than standard T1-weighted sequences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08236-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8831263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88312632022-02-23 Ultrashort echo time MRI of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast T1w MRI sequences Renz, Diane M. Herrmann, Karl-Heinz Kraemer, Martin Boettcher, Joachim Waginger, Matthias Krueger, Paul-Christian Pfeil, Alexander Streitparth, Florian Kentouche, Karim Gruhn, Bernd Mainz, Jochen G. Stenzel, Martin Teichgraeber, Ulf K. Reichenbach, Juergen R. Mentzel, Hans-Joachim Eur Radiol Paediatric OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic value of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the lung versus the gold standard computed tomography (CT) and two T1-weighted MRI sequences in children. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with proven oncologic disease (14 male, 9 female; mean age 9.0 + / − 5.4 years) received 35 low-dose CT and MRI examinations of the lung. The MRI protocol (1.5-T) included the following post-contrast sequences: two-dimensional (2D) incoherent gradient echo (GRE; acquisition with breath-hold), 3D volume interpolated GRE (breath-hold), and 3D high-resolution radial UTE sequences (performed during free-breathing). Images were evaluated by considering image quality as well as distinct diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and parenchymal areal opacities with consideration of sizes and characterisations. RESULTS: The UTE technique showed significantly higher overall image quality, better sharpness, and fewer artefacts than both other sequences. On CT, 110 pulmonary nodules with a mean diameter of 4.9 + / − 2.9 mm were detected. UTE imaging resulted in a significantly higher detection rate compared to both other sequences (p < 0.01): 76.4% (84 of 110 nodules) for UTE versus 60.9% (67 of 110) for incoherent GRE and 62.7% (69 of 110) for volume interpolated GRE sequences. The detection of parenchymal areal opacities by the UTE technique was also significantly higher with a rate of 93.3% (42 of 45 opacities) versus 77.8% (35 of 45) for 2D GRE and 80.0% (36 of 45) for 3D GRE sequences (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The UTE technique for lung MRI is favourable in children with generally high diagnostic performance compared to standard T1-weighted sequences as well as CT. Key Points • Due to the possible acquisition during free-breathing of the patients, the UTE MRI sequence for the lung is favourable in children. • The UTE technique reaches higher overall image quality, better sharpness, and lower artefacts, but not higher contrast compared to standard post-contrast T1-weighted sequences. • In comparison to the gold standard chest CT, the detection rate of small pulmonary nodules small nodules ≤ 4 mm and subtle parenchymal areal opacities is higher with the UTE imaging than standard T1-weighted sequences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08236-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8831263/ /pubmed/34668994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08236-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Paediatric
Renz, Diane M.
Herrmann, Karl-Heinz
Kraemer, Martin
Boettcher, Joachim
Waginger, Matthias
Krueger, Paul-Christian
Pfeil, Alexander
Streitparth, Florian
Kentouche, Karim
Gruhn, Bernd
Mainz, Jochen G.
Stenzel, Martin
Teichgraeber, Ulf K.
Reichenbach, Juergen R.
Mentzel, Hans-Joachim
Ultrashort echo time MRI of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast T1w MRI sequences
title Ultrashort echo time MRI of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast T1w MRI sequences
title_full Ultrashort echo time MRI of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast T1w MRI sequences
title_fullStr Ultrashort echo time MRI of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast T1w MRI sequences
title_full_unstemmed Ultrashort echo time MRI of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast T1w MRI sequences
title_short Ultrashort echo time MRI of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast T1w MRI sequences
title_sort ultrashort echo time mri of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast t1w mri sequences
topic Paediatric
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34668994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08236-7
work_keys_str_mv AT renzdianem ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT herrmannkarlheinz ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT kraemermartin ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT boettcherjoachim ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT wagingermatthias ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT kruegerpaulchristian ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT pfeilalexander ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT streitparthflorian ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT kentouchekarim ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT gruhnbernd ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT mainzjocheng ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT stenzelmartin ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT teichgraeberulfk ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT reichenbachjuergenr ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences
AT mentzelhansjoachim ultrashortechotimemriofthelunginchildrenandadolescentscomparisonwithnonenhancedcomputedtomographyandstandardpostcontrastt1wmrisequences