Cargando…
Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA)
OBJECTIVES: Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can inform surgical planning but might cause overtreatment by increasing the mastectomy rate. The Multicenter International Prospective Analysis (MIPA) study investigated this controversial issue. METHODS: This observational study enro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08240-x |
_version_ | 1784648467917832192 |
---|---|
author | Sardanelli, Francesco Trimboli, Rubina M. Houssami, Nehmat Gilbert, Fiona J. Helbich, Thomas H. Álvarez Benito, Marina Balleyguier, Corinne Bazzocchi, Massimo Bult, Peter Calabrese, Massimo Camps Herrero, Julia Cartia, Francesco Cassano, Enrico Clauser, Paola Cozzi, Andrea de Andrade, Danúbia A. de Lima Docema, Marcos F. Depretto, Catherine Dominelli, Valeria Forrai, Gábor Girometti, Rossano Harms, Steven E. Hilborne, Sarah Ienzi, Raffaele Lobbes, Marc B. I. Losio, Claudio Mann, Ritse M. Montemezzi, Stefania Obdeijn, Inge-Marie Ozcan, Umit A. Pediconi, Federica Pinker, Katja Preibsch, Heike Raya Povedano, José L. Sacchetto, Daniela Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P. Schiaffino, Simone Schlooz, Margrethe Szabó, Botond K. Taylor, Donna B. Ulus, Özden S. Van Goethem, Mireille Veltman, Jeroen Weigel, Stefanie Wenkel, Evelyn Zuiani, Chiara Di Leo, Giovanni |
author_facet | Sardanelli, Francesco Trimboli, Rubina M. Houssami, Nehmat Gilbert, Fiona J. Helbich, Thomas H. Álvarez Benito, Marina Balleyguier, Corinne Bazzocchi, Massimo Bult, Peter Calabrese, Massimo Camps Herrero, Julia Cartia, Francesco Cassano, Enrico Clauser, Paola Cozzi, Andrea de Andrade, Danúbia A. de Lima Docema, Marcos F. Depretto, Catherine Dominelli, Valeria Forrai, Gábor Girometti, Rossano Harms, Steven E. Hilborne, Sarah Ienzi, Raffaele Lobbes, Marc B. I. Losio, Claudio Mann, Ritse M. Montemezzi, Stefania Obdeijn, Inge-Marie Ozcan, Umit A. Pediconi, Federica Pinker, Katja Preibsch, Heike Raya Povedano, José L. Sacchetto, Daniela Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P. Schiaffino, Simone Schlooz, Margrethe Szabó, Botond K. Taylor, Donna B. Ulus, Özden S. Van Goethem, Mireille Veltman, Jeroen Weigel, Stefanie Wenkel, Evelyn Zuiani, Chiara Di Leo, Giovanni |
author_sort | Sardanelli, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can inform surgical planning but might cause overtreatment by increasing the mastectomy rate. The Multicenter International Prospective Analysis (MIPA) study investigated this controversial issue. METHODS: This observational study enrolled women aged 18–80 years with biopsy-proven breast cancer, who underwent MRI in addition to conventional imaging (mammography and/or breast ultrasonography) or conventional imaging alone before surgery as routine practice at 27 centers. Exclusion criteria included planned neoadjuvant therapy, pregnancy, personal history of any cancer, and distant metastases. RESULTS: Of 5896 analyzed patients, 2763 (46.9%) had conventional imaging only (noMRI group), and 3133 (53.1%) underwent MRI that was performed for diagnosis, screening, or unknown purposes in 692/3133 women (22.1%), with preoperative intent in 2441/3133 women (77.9%, MRI group). Patients in the MRI group were younger, had denser breasts, more cancers ≥ 20 mm, and a higher rate of invasive lobular histology than patients who underwent conventional imaging alone (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Mastectomy was planned based on conventional imaging in 22.4% (MRI group) versus 14.4% (noMRI group) (p < 0.001). The additional planned mastectomy rate in the MRI group was 11.3%. The overall performed first- plus second-line mastectomy rate was 36.3% (MRI group) versus 18.0% (noMRI group) (p < 0.001). In women receiving conserving surgery, MRI group had a significantly lower reoperation rate (8.5% versus 11.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians requested breast MRI for women with a higher a priori probability of receiving mastectomy. MRI was associated with 11.3% more mastectomies, and with 3.2% fewer reoperations in the breast conservation subgroup. KEY POINTS: • In 19% of patients of the MIPA study, breast MRI was performed for screening or diagnostic purposes. • The current patient selection to preoperative breast MRI implies an 11% increase in mastectomies, counterbalanced by a 3% reduction of the reoperation rate. • Data from the MIPA study can support discussion in tumor boards when preoperative MRI is under consideration and should be shared with patients to achieve informed decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8831264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88312642022-03-02 Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA) Sardanelli, Francesco Trimboli, Rubina M. Houssami, Nehmat Gilbert, Fiona J. Helbich, Thomas H. Álvarez Benito, Marina Balleyguier, Corinne Bazzocchi, Massimo Bult, Peter Calabrese, Massimo Camps Herrero, Julia Cartia, Francesco Cassano, Enrico Clauser, Paola Cozzi, Andrea de Andrade, Danúbia A. de Lima Docema, Marcos F. Depretto, Catherine Dominelli, Valeria Forrai, Gábor Girometti, Rossano Harms, Steven E. Hilborne, Sarah Ienzi, Raffaele Lobbes, Marc B. I. Losio, Claudio Mann, Ritse M. Montemezzi, Stefania Obdeijn, Inge-Marie Ozcan, Umit A. Pediconi, Federica Pinker, Katja Preibsch, Heike Raya Povedano, José L. Sacchetto, Daniela Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P. Schiaffino, Simone Schlooz, Margrethe Szabó, Botond K. Taylor, Donna B. Ulus, Özden S. Van Goethem, Mireille Veltman, Jeroen Weigel, Stefanie Wenkel, Evelyn Zuiani, Chiara Di Leo, Giovanni Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVES: Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can inform surgical planning but might cause overtreatment by increasing the mastectomy rate. The Multicenter International Prospective Analysis (MIPA) study investigated this controversial issue. METHODS: This observational study enrolled women aged 18–80 years with biopsy-proven breast cancer, who underwent MRI in addition to conventional imaging (mammography and/or breast ultrasonography) or conventional imaging alone before surgery as routine practice at 27 centers. Exclusion criteria included planned neoadjuvant therapy, pregnancy, personal history of any cancer, and distant metastases. RESULTS: Of 5896 analyzed patients, 2763 (46.9%) had conventional imaging only (noMRI group), and 3133 (53.1%) underwent MRI that was performed for diagnosis, screening, or unknown purposes in 692/3133 women (22.1%), with preoperative intent in 2441/3133 women (77.9%, MRI group). Patients in the MRI group were younger, had denser breasts, more cancers ≥ 20 mm, and a higher rate of invasive lobular histology than patients who underwent conventional imaging alone (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Mastectomy was planned based on conventional imaging in 22.4% (MRI group) versus 14.4% (noMRI group) (p < 0.001). The additional planned mastectomy rate in the MRI group was 11.3%. The overall performed first- plus second-line mastectomy rate was 36.3% (MRI group) versus 18.0% (noMRI group) (p < 0.001). In women receiving conserving surgery, MRI group had a significantly lower reoperation rate (8.5% versus 11.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians requested breast MRI for women with a higher a priori probability of receiving mastectomy. MRI was associated with 11.3% more mastectomies, and with 3.2% fewer reoperations in the breast conservation subgroup. KEY POINTS: • In 19% of patients of the MIPA study, breast MRI was performed for screening or diagnostic purposes. • The current patient selection to preoperative breast MRI implies an 11% increase in mastectomies, counterbalanced by a 3% reduction of the reoperation rate. • Data from the MIPA study can support discussion in tumor boards when preoperative MRI is under consideration and should be shared with patients to achieve informed decision-making. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8831264/ /pubmed/34643778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08240-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Breast Sardanelli, Francesco Trimboli, Rubina M. Houssami, Nehmat Gilbert, Fiona J. Helbich, Thomas H. Álvarez Benito, Marina Balleyguier, Corinne Bazzocchi, Massimo Bult, Peter Calabrese, Massimo Camps Herrero, Julia Cartia, Francesco Cassano, Enrico Clauser, Paola Cozzi, Andrea de Andrade, Danúbia A. de Lima Docema, Marcos F. Depretto, Catherine Dominelli, Valeria Forrai, Gábor Girometti, Rossano Harms, Steven E. Hilborne, Sarah Ienzi, Raffaele Lobbes, Marc B. I. Losio, Claudio Mann, Ritse M. Montemezzi, Stefania Obdeijn, Inge-Marie Ozcan, Umit A. Pediconi, Federica Pinker, Katja Preibsch, Heike Raya Povedano, José L. Sacchetto, Daniela Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P. Schiaffino, Simone Schlooz, Margrethe Szabó, Botond K. Taylor, Donna B. Ulus, Özden S. Van Goethem, Mireille Veltman, Jeroen Weigel, Stefanie Wenkel, Evelyn Zuiani, Chiara Di Leo, Giovanni Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA) |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA) |
title_full | Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA) |
title_fullStr | Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA) |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA) |
title_short | Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA) |
title_sort | magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery: results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (mipa) |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08240-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sardanellifrancesco magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT trimbolirubinam magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT houssaminehmat magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT gilbertfionaj magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT helbichthomash magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT alvarezbenitomarina magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT balleyguiercorinne magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT bazzocchimassimo magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT bultpeter magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT calabresemassimo magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT campsherrerojulia magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT cartiafrancesco magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT cassanoenrico magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT clauserpaola magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT cozziandrea magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT deandradedanubiaa magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT delimadocemamarcosf magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT deprettocatherine magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT dominellivaleria magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT forraigabor magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT giromettirossano magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT harmsstevene magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT hilbornesarah magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT ienziraffaele magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT lobbesmarcbi magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT losioclaudio magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT mannritsem magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT montemezzistefania magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT obdeijningemarie magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT ozcanumita magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT pediconifederica magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT pinkerkatja magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT preibschheike magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT rayapovedanojosel magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT sacchettodaniela magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT scaperrottagianfrancop magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT schiaffinosimone magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT schloozmargrethe magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT szabobotondk magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT taylordonnab magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT ulusozdens magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT vangoethemmireille magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT veltmanjeroen magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT weigelstefanie magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT wenkelevelyn magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT zuianichiara magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa AT dileogiovanni magneticresonanceimagingbeforebreastcancersurgeryresultsofanobservationalmulticenterinternationalprospectiveanalysismipa |