Cargando…
Influence of safety glasses, body height and magnification on the occupational eye lens dose during pelvic vascular interventions: a phantom study
OBJECTIVE: By simulating a fluoroscopic-guided vascular intervention, two differently designed radiation safety glasses were compared. The impacts of changing viewing directions and body heights on the eye lens dose were evaluated. Additionally, the effect of variable magnification levels on the ari...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34495352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08231-y |
_version_ | 1784648468155858944 |
---|---|
author | Gangl, Alexander Deutschmann, Hannes Alexander Portugaller, Rupert Horst Stücklschweiger, Georg |
author_facet | Gangl, Alexander Deutschmann, Hannes Alexander Portugaller, Rupert Horst Stücklschweiger, Georg |
author_sort | Gangl, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: By simulating a fluoroscopic-guided vascular intervention, two differently designed radiation safety glasses were compared. The impacts of changing viewing directions and body heights on the eye lens dose were evaluated. Additionally, the effect of variable magnification levels on the arising scattered radiation was determined. METHODS: A phantom head, replacing the operator’s head, was positioned at different heights and rotated in steps of 20° in the horizontal plane. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD), placed in the left orbit of the phantom, detected eye lens doses under protected and completely exposed conditions. In a second step, radiation dose values with increasing magnification levels were detected by RaySafe i3 dosimeters. RESULTS: Changing eye levels and head rotations resulted in a wide range of dose reduction factors (DRF) from 1.1 to 8.5. Increasing the vertical distance between the scattering body and the protective eyewear, DRFs markedly decreased for both glasses. Significant differences between protection glasses were observed. Increasing magnification with consecutively decreasing FOV size variably reduced the dose exposure to the eye lens between 47 and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The safety glasses in the study effectively reduced the dose exposure to the eye lens. However, the extent of the protective effect was significant depending on eye levels and head rotations. This may lead to a false sense of safety for the medical staff. In addition, the application of magnification reduced the quantity of scattering dose significantly. To ensure safe working in the Cath-lab, additional use of protective equipment and the differences in design of protective eyewear should be considered. KEY POINTS: • Eye lens dose changes with physical size of the interventionist and viewing direction. • The use of magnification during fluoroscopic-guided interventions reduces scattered radiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8831265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88312652022-02-23 Influence of safety glasses, body height and magnification on the occupational eye lens dose during pelvic vascular interventions: a phantom study Gangl, Alexander Deutschmann, Hannes Alexander Portugaller, Rupert Horst Stücklschweiger, Georg Eur Radiol Vascular-Interventional OBJECTIVE: By simulating a fluoroscopic-guided vascular intervention, two differently designed radiation safety glasses were compared. The impacts of changing viewing directions and body heights on the eye lens dose were evaluated. Additionally, the effect of variable magnification levels on the arising scattered radiation was determined. METHODS: A phantom head, replacing the operator’s head, was positioned at different heights and rotated in steps of 20° in the horizontal plane. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD), placed in the left orbit of the phantom, detected eye lens doses under protected and completely exposed conditions. In a second step, radiation dose values with increasing magnification levels were detected by RaySafe i3 dosimeters. RESULTS: Changing eye levels and head rotations resulted in a wide range of dose reduction factors (DRF) from 1.1 to 8.5. Increasing the vertical distance between the scattering body and the protective eyewear, DRFs markedly decreased for both glasses. Significant differences between protection glasses were observed. Increasing magnification with consecutively decreasing FOV size variably reduced the dose exposure to the eye lens between 47 and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The safety glasses in the study effectively reduced the dose exposure to the eye lens. However, the extent of the protective effect was significant depending on eye levels and head rotations. This may lead to a false sense of safety for the medical staff. In addition, the application of magnification reduced the quantity of scattering dose significantly. To ensure safe working in the Cath-lab, additional use of protective equipment and the differences in design of protective eyewear should be considered. KEY POINTS: • Eye lens dose changes with physical size of the interventionist and viewing direction. • The use of magnification during fluoroscopic-guided interventions reduces scattered radiation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8831265/ /pubmed/34495352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08231-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Vascular-Interventional Gangl, Alexander Deutschmann, Hannes Alexander Portugaller, Rupert Horst Stücklschweiger, Georg Influence of safety glasses, body height and magnification on the occupational eye lens dose during pelvic vascular interventions: a phantom study |
title | Influence of safety glasses, body height and magnification on the occupational eye lens dose during pelvic vascular interventions: a phantom study |
title_full | Influence of safety glasses, body height and magnification on the occupational eye lens dose during pelvic vascular interventions: a phantom study |
title_fullStr | Influence of safety glasses, body height and magnification on the occupational eye lens dose during pelvic vascular interventions: a phantom study |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of safety glasses, body height and magnification on the occupational eye lens dose during pelvic vascular interventions: a phantom study |
title_short | Influence of safety glasses, body height and magnification on the occupational eye lens dose during pelvic vascular interventions: a phantom study |
title_sort | influence of safety glasses, body height and magnification on the occupational eye lens dose during pelvic vascular interventions: a phantom study |
topic | Vascular-Interventional |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34495352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08231-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ganglalexander influenceofsafetyglassesbodyheightandmagnificationontheoccupationaleyelensdoseduringpelvicvascularinterventionsaphantomstudy AT deutschmannhannesalexander influenceofsafetyglassesbodyheightandmagnificationontheoccupationaleyelensdoseduringpelvicvascularinterventionsaphantomstudy AT portugallerruperthorst influenceofsafetyglassesbodyheightandmagnificationontheoccupationaleyelensdoseduringpelvicvascularinterventionsaphantomstudy AT stucklschweigergeorg influenceofsafetyglassesbodyheightandmagnificationontheoccupationaleyelensdoseduringpelvicvascularinterventionsaphantomstudy |