Cargando…
Rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel
Rapid detection of pathogens causing bloodstream infections (BSI) directly from positive blood cultures is of highest importance in order to enable an adequate and timely antimicrobial therapy. In this study, the utility and performance of a recently launched next-generation fully automated test sys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34350523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04314-2 |
_version_ | 1784648470171222016 |
---|---|
author | Holma, Tanja Torvikoski, Jukka Friberg, Nathalie Nevalainen, Annika Tarkka, Eveliina Antikainen, Jenni Martelin, Jari J. |
author_facet | Holma, Tanja Torvikoski, Jukka Friberg, Nathalie Nevalainen, Annika Tarkka, Eveliina Antikainen, Jenni Martelin, Jari J. |
author_sort | Holma, Tanja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapid detection of pathogens causing bloodstream infections (BSI) directly from positive blood cultures is of highest importance in order to enable an adequate and timely antimicrobial therapy. In this study, the utility and performance of a recently launched next-generation fully automated test system, the Biofire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel, was evaluated using a set of 103 well-characterized microbial isolates including 29 antimicrobial resistance genes and 80 signal-positive and 23 signal-negative clinical blood culture samples. The results were compared to culture-based reference methods, MALDI-TOF, and/or 16S rDNA sequencing. Of the clinical blood culture samples, 68 were monomicrobial (85.0%) and 12 polymicrobial (15.0%). Six samples contained ESBL (bla(CTX-M)), two MRSA (mecA), and three MRSE (mecA) isolates. In overall, the FilmArray BCID2 panel detected well on-panel targets and resistance markers from mono- and polymicrobial samples. However, one Klebsiella aerogenes and one Bacteroides ovatus were undetected, and the assay falsely reported one Shigella flexneri as Escherichia coli. Hence, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting microbial species were 98.8% (95%CI, 95.8–99.9%) and 99.9% (95%CI, 99.8–99.9%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting of resistance gene markers were 100%. The results were available within 70 min from signal-positive blood cultures with minimal hands-on time. In conclusion, the BCID2 test allows reliable and simplified detection of a vast variety of clinically relevant microbes causing BSI and the most common antimicrobial resistance markers present among these isolates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8831274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88312742022-02-23 Rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel Holma, Tanja Torvikoski, Jukka Friberg, Nathalie Nevalainen, Annika Tarkka, Eveliina Antikainen, Jenni Martelin, Jari J. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Rapid detection of pathogens causing bloodstream infections (BSI) directly from positive blood cultures is of highest importance in order to enable an adequate and timely antimicrobial therapy. In this study, the utility and performance of a recently launched next-generation fully automated test system, the Biofire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel, was evaluated using a set of 103 well-characterized microbial isolates including 29 antimicrobial resistance genes and 80 signal-positive and 23 signal-negative clinical blood culture samples. The results were compared to culture-based reference methods, MALDI-TOF, and/or 16S rDNA sequencing. Of the clinical blood culture samples, 68 were monomicrobial (85.0%) and 12 polymicrobial (15.0%). Six samples contained ESBL (bla(CTX-M)), two MRSA (mecA), and three MRSE (mecA) isolates. In overall, the FilmArray BCID2 panel detected well on-panel targets and resistance markers from mono- and polymicrobial samples. However, one Klebsiella aerogenes and one Bacteroides ovatus were undetected, and the assay falsely reported one Shigella flexneri as Escherichia coli. Hence, the sensitivity and specificity for detecting microbial species were 98.8% (95%CI, 95.8–99.9%) and 99.9% (95%CI, 99.8–99.9%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting of resistance gene markers were 100%. The results were available within 70 min from signal-positive blood cultures with minimal hands-on time. In conclusion, the BCID2 test allows reliable and simplified detection of a vast variety of clinically relevant microbes causing BSI and the most common antimicrobial resistance markers present among these isolates. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8831274/ /pubmed/34350523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04314-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Holma, Tanja Torvikoski, Jukka Friberg, Nathalie Nevalainen, Annika Tarkka, Eveliina Antikainen, Jenni Martelin, Jari J. Rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel |
title | Rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel |
title_full | Rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel |
title_fullStr | Rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel |
title_short | Rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panel |
title_sort | rapid molecular detection of pathogenic microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance markers in blood cultures: evaluation and utility of the next-generation filmarray blood culture identification 2 panel |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34350523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-021-04314-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holmatanja rapidmoleculardetectionofpathogenicmicroorganismsandantimicrobialresistancemarkersinbloodculturesevaluationandutilityofthenextgenerationfilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panel AT torvikoskijukka rapidmoleculardetectionofpathogenicmicroorganismsandantimicrobialresistancemarkersinbloodculturesevaluationandutilityofthenextgenerationfilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panel AT fribergnathalie rapidmoleculardetectionofpathogenicmicroorganismsandantimicrobialresistancemarkersinbloodculturesevaluationandutilityofthenextgenerationfilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panel AT nevalainenannika rapidmoleculardetectionofpathogenicmicroorganismsandantimicrobialresistancemarkersinbloodculturesevaluationandutilityofthenextgenerationfilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panel AT tarkkaeveliina rapidmoleculardetectionofpathogenicmicroorganismsandantimicrobialresistancemarkersinbloodculturesevaluationandutilityofthenextgenerationfilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panel AT antikainenjenni rapidmoleculardetectionofpathogenicmicroorganismsandantimicrobialresistancemarkersinbloodculturesevaluationandutilityofthenextgenerationfilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panel AT martelinjarij rapidmoleculardetectionofpathogenicmicroorganismsandantimicrobialresistancemarkersinbloodculturesevaluationandutilityofthenextgenerationfilmarraybloodcultureidentification2panel |