Defining the Inframammary Fold by Liposuction: An Essential Tool in Aesthetic Shaping of the Reconstructed Breast. Technique and Long-term Results in a Series of Patients

BACKGROUND: A good inframammary fold (IMF) definition and position is essential to achieve a satisfactory and natural result in breast surgery. This structure can be damaged, especially during mastectomies. Multiple methods are reported in the literature to restore IMF or improve its definition. In this study, we present the results achieved in a series of patients treated with subdermal liposuction. METHODS: We report on all our patients who underwent IMF liposuction between January 2016 and June 2020. Subdermal liposuction was performed with a blunt 3 mm cannula along the new IMF to promote skin retraction and adherence between skin and fascia. Results were evaluated subjectively by the patients and objectively by 8 individuals not involved with the treatment. RESULTS: We performed IMF liposuction in 88 breasts (69 patients), aged 21–74 (mean 52) years for 82 implant-based reconstructions, 2 tuberous breasts, and 4 contralateral breast augmentations. Mean follow-up was 28 months (6–64). Subjective results: the overall result evaluated with the VAS scale reached 86.6/100. All the 22 patients interviewed judged as well defined the new inframammary fold. Objective results: in 83% of cases the definition of the inframammary fold was judged as good or excellent, while symmetry with contralateral IMF, natural appearance, and overall aesthetic outcome were judged as good. CONCLUSION: Based on our long-term satisfactory results, we recommend the technique of subdermal liposuction to improve the definition of IMF in breast reconstruction after mastectomy and other breast procedures. It is effective, easy to perform, minimally invasive, and durable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.