Cargando…

Defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a “coffee-break” CT study and implications for current nodule management guidelines

OBJECTIVES: An increase in lung nodule volume on serial CT may represent true growth or measurement variation. In nodule guidelines, a 25% increase in nodule volume is frequently used to determine that growth has occurred; this is based on previous same-day, test–retest (coffee-break) studies examin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartlett, Emily C., Kemp, Samuel V., Rawal, Bhavin, Devaraj, Anand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08302-0
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: An increase in lung nodule volume on serial CT may represent true growth or measurement variation. In nodule guidelines, a 25% increase in nodule volume is frequently used to determine that growth has occurred; this is based on previous same-day, test–retest (coffee-break) studies examining metastatic nodules. Whether results from prior studies apply to small non-metastatic nodules is unknown. This study aimed to establish the interscan variability in the volumetric measurements of small-sized non-metastatic nodules. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. Between March 2019 and January 2021, 45 adults (25 males; mean age 65 years, range 37–84 years) with previously identified pulmonary nodules (30–150 mm(3)) requiring surveillance, without a known primary tumour, underwent two same-day CT scans. Non-calcified solid nodules were measured using commercial volumetry software, and interscan variability of volume measurements was assessed using a Bland–Altman method and limits of agreement. RESULTS: One hundred nodules (range 28–170 mm(3); mean 81.1 mm(3)) were analysed. The lower and upper limits of agreement for the absolute volume difference between the two scans were − 14.2 mm(3) and 12.0 mm(3) respectively (mean difference 1.09 mm(3), range − 33–12 mm(3)). The lower and upper limits of agreement for relative volume difference were − 16.4% and 14.6% respectively (mean difference 0.90%, range − 24.1–32.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The interscan volume variability in this cohort of small non-metastatic nodules was smaller than that in previous studies involving lung metastases of varying sizes. An increase of 15% in nodule volume on sequential CT may represent true growth, and closer surveillance of these nodules may be warranted. KEY POINTS: • In current pulmonary nodule management guidelines, a threshold of 25% increase in volume is required to determine that true growth of a pulmonary nodule has occurred. • This test–retest (coffee break) study has demonstrated that a smaller threshold of 15% increase in volume may represent true growth in small non-metastatic nodules. • Closer surveillance of some small nodules growing 15–25% over a short interval may be appropriate.