Cargando…
Defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a “coffee-break” CT study and implications for current nodule management guidelines
OBJECTIVES: An increase in lung nodule volume on serial CT may represent true growth or measurement variation. In nodule guidelines, a 25% increase in nodule volume is frequently used to determine that growth has occurred; this is based on previous same-day, test–retest (coffee-break) studies examin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08302-0 |
_version_ | 1784648486793248768 |
---|---|
author | Bartlett, Emily C. Kemp, Samuel V. Rawal, Bhavin Devaraj, Anand |
author_facet | Bartlett, Emily C. Kemp, Samuel V. Rawal, Bhavin Devaraj, Anand |
author_sort | Bartlett, Emily C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: An increase in lung nodule volume on serial CT may represent true growth or measurement variation. In nodule guidelines, a 25% increase in nodule volume is frequently used to determine that growth has occurred; this is based on previous same-day, test–retest (coffee-break) studies examining metastatic nodules. Whether results from prior studies apply to small non-metastatic nodules is unknown. This study aimed to establish the interscan variability in the volumetric measurements of small-sized non-metastatic nodules. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. Between March 2019 and January 2021, 45 adults (25 males; mean age 65 years, range 37–84 years) with previously identified pulmonary nodules (30–150 mm(3)) requiring surveillance, without a known primary tumour, underwent two same-day CT scans. Non-calcified solid nodules were measured using commercial volumetry software, and interscan variability of volume measurements was assessed using a Bland–Altman method and limits of agreement. RESULTS: One hundred nodules (range 28–170 mm(3); mean 81.1 mm(3)) were analysed. The lower and upper limits of agreement for the absolute volume difference between the two scans were − 14.2 mm(3) and 12.0 mm(3) respectively (mean difference 1.09 mm(3), range − 33–12 mm(3)). The lower and upper limits of agreement for relative volume difference were − 16.4% and 14.6% respectively (mean difference 0.90%, range − 24.1–32.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The interscan volume variability in this cohort of small non-metastatic nodules was smaller than that in previous studies involving lung metastases of varying sizes. An increase of 15% in nodule volume on sequential CT may represent true growth, and closer surveillance of these nodules may be warranted. KEY POINTS: • In current pulmonary nodule management guidelines, a threshold of 25% increase in volume is required to determine that true growth of a pulmonary nodule has occurred. • This test–retest (coffee break) study has demonstrated that a smaller threshold of 15% increase in volume may represent true growth in small non-metastatic nodules. • Closer surveillance of some small nodules growing 15–25% over a short interval may be appropriate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8831344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88313442022-02-23 Defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a “coffee-break” CT study and implications for current nodule management guidelines Bartlett, Emily C. Kemp, Samuel V. Rawal, Bhavin Devaraj, Anand Eur Radiol Chest OBJECTIVES: An increase in lung nodule volume on serial CT may represent true growth or measurement variation. In nodule guidelines, a 25% increase in nodule volume is frequently used to determine that growth has occurred; this is based on previous same-day, test–retest (coffee-break) studies examining metastatic nodules. Whether results from prior studies apply to small non-metastatic nodules is unknown. This study aimed to establish the interscan variability in the volumetric measurements of small-sized non-metastatic nodules. METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this study. Between March 2019 and January 2021, 45 adults (25 males; mean age 65 years, range 37–84 years) with previously identified pulmonary nodules (30–150 mm(3)) requiring surveillance, without a known primary tumour, underwent two same-day CT scans. Non-calcified solid nodules were measured using commercial volumetry software, and interscan variability of volume measurements was assessed using a Bland–Altman method and limits of agreement. RESULTS: One hundred nodules (range 28–170 mm(3); mean 81.1 mm(3)) were analysed. The lower and upper limits of agreement for the absolute volume difference between the two scans were − 14.2 mm(3) and 12.0 mm(3) respectively (mean difference 1.09 mm(3), range − 33–12 mm(3)). The lower and upper limits of agreement for relative volume difference were − 16.4% and 14.6% respectively (mean difference 0.90%, range − 24.1–32.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The interscan volume variability in this cohort of small non-metastatic nodules was smaller than that in previous studies involving lung metastases of varying sizes. An increase of 15% in nodule volume on sequential CT may represent true growth, and closer surveillance of these nodules may be warranted. KEY POINTS: • In current pulmonary nodule management guidelines, a threshold of 25% increase in volume is required to determine that true growth of a pulmonary nodule has occurred. • This test–retest (coffee break) study has demonstrated that a smaller threshold of 15% increase in volume may represent true growth in small non-metastatic nodules. • Closer surveillance of some small nodules growing 15–25% over a short interval may be appropriate. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8831344/ /pubmed/34580748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08302-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Chest Bartlett, Emily C. Kemp, Samuel V. Rawal, Bhavin Devaraj, Anand Defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a “coffee-break” CT study and implications for current nodule management guidelines |
title | Defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a “coffee-break” CT study and implications for current nodule management guidelines |
title_full | Defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a “coffee-break” CT study and implications for current nodule management guidelines |
title_fullStr | Defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a “coffee-break” CT study and implications for current nodule management guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a “coffee-break” CT study and implications for current nodule management guidelines |
title_short | Defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a “coffee-break” CT study and implications for current nodule management guidelines |
title_sort | defining growth in small pulmonary nodules using volumetry: results from a “coffee-break” ct study and implications for current nodule management guidelines |
topic | Chest |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08302-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartlettemilyc defininggrowthinsmallpulmonarynodulesusingvolumetryresultsfromacoffeebreakctstudyandimplicationsforcurrentnodulemanagementguidelines AT kempsamuelv defininggrowthinsmallpulmonarynodulesusingvolumetryresultsfromacoffeebreakctstudyandimplicationsforcurrentnodulemanagementguidelines AT rawalbhavin defininggrowthinsmallpulmonarynodulesusingvolumetryresultsfromacoffeebreakctstudyandimplicationsforcurrentnodulemanagementguidelines AT devarajanand defininggrowthinsmallpulmonarynodulesusingvolumetryresultsfromacoffeebreakctstudyandimplicationsforcurrentnodulemanagementguidelines |