Cargando…

Clinical Impact of Different Reconstruction Methods on Remnant Gastric Cancer at the Anastomotic Site after Distal Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The anastomotic site after distal gastrectomy is the area most affected by duodenogastric reflux. Different reconstruction methods may affect the lesion characteristics and treatment outcomes of remnant gastric cancers at the anastomotic site. We retrospectively investigated the cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsumoto, Kei, Tanaka, Shinwa, Toyonaga, Takashi, Ikezawa, Nobuaki, Nishio, Mari, Uraoka, Masanao, Yoshihara, Tomoatsu, Sakaguchi, Hiroya, Abe, Hirofumi, Yoshizaki, Tetsuya, Takao, Madoka, Takao, Toshitatsu, Morita, Yoshinori, Yokozaki, Hiroshi, Kodama, Yuzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34384165
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.084
_version_ 1784648500281081856
author Matsumoto, Kei
Tanaka, Shinwa
Toyonaga, Takashi
Ikezawa, Nobuaki
Nishio, Mari
Uraoka, Masanao
Yoshihara, Tomoatsu
Sakaguchi, Hiroya
Abe, Hirofumi
Yoshizaki, Tetsuya
Takao, Madoka
Takao, Toshitatsu
Morita, Yoshinori
Yokozaki, Hiroshi
Kodama, Yuzo
author_facet Matsumoto, Kei
Tanaka, Shinwa
Toyonaga, Takashi
Ikezawa, Nobuaki
Nishio, Mari
Uraoka, Masanao
Yoshihara, Tomoatsu
Sakaguchi, Hiroya
Abe, Hirofumi
Yoshizaki, Tetsuya
Takao, Madoka
Takao, Toshitatsu
Morita, Yoshinori
Yokozaki, Hiroshi
Kodama, Yuzo
author_sort Matsumoto, Kei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The anastomotic site after distal gastrectomy is the area most affected by duodenogastric reflux. Different reconstruction methods may affect the lesion characteristics and treatment outcomes of remnant gastric cancers at the anastomotic site. We retrospectively investigated the clinicopathologic and endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes of remnant gastric cancers at the anastomotic site. METHODS: We recruited 34 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for remnant gastric cancer at the anastomotic site after distal gastrectomy. Clinicopathology and treatment outcomes were compared between the Billroth II and non-Billroth II groups. RESULTS: The tumor size in the Billroth II group was significantly larger than that in the non-Billroth II group (22 vs. 19 mm; p=0.048). More severe gastritis was detected endoscopically in the Billroth II group (2 vs. 1.33; p=0.0075). Moreover, operation time was longer (238 vs. 121 min; p=0.004) and the frequency of bleeding episodes was higher (7.5 vs. 3.1; p=0.014) in the Billroth II group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to remnant gastric cancers in non-Billroth II patients, those in the Billroth II group had larger lesions with a background of severe remnant gastritis. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for remnant gastric cancers in Billroth II patients involved longer operative times and more frequent bleeding episodes than that in patients without Billroth II.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8831400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88314002022-02-22 Clinical Impact of Different Reconstruction Methods on Remnant Gastric Cancer at the Anastomotic Site after Distal Gastrectomy Matsumoto, Kei Tanaka, Shinwa Toyonaga, Takashi Ikezawa, Nobuaki Nishio, Mari Uraoka, Masanao Yoshihara, Tomoatsu Sakaguchi, Hiroya Abe, Hirofumi Yoshizaki, Tetsuya Takao, Madoka Takao, Toshitatsu Morita, Yoshinori Yokozaki, Hiroshi Kodama, Yuzo Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The anastomotic site after distal gastrectomy is the area most affected by duodenogastric reflux. Different reconstruction methods may affect the lesion characteristics and treatment outcomes of remnant gastric cancers at the anastomotic site. We retrospectively investigated the clinicopathologic and endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes of remnant gastric cancers at the anastomotic site. METHODS: We recruited 34 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for remnant gastric cancer at the anastomotic site after distal gastrectomy. Clinicopathology and treatment outcomes were compared between the Billroth II and non-Billroth II groups. RESULTS: The tumor size in the Billroth II group was significantly larger than that in the non-Billroth II group (22 vs. 19 mm; p=0.048). More severe gastritis was detected endoscopically in the Billroth II group (2 vs. 1.33; p=0.0075). Moreover, operation time was longer (238 vs. 121 min; p=0.004) and the frequency of bleeding episodes was higher (7.5 vs. 3.1; p=0.014) in the Billroth II group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to remnant gastric cancers in non-Billroth II patients, those in the Billroth II group had larger lesions with a background of severe remnant gastritis. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for remnant gastric cancers in Billroth II patients involved longer operative times and more frequent bleeding episodes than that in patients without Billroth II. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-01 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8831400/ /pubmed/34384165 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.084 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Matsumoto, Kei
Tanaka, Shinwa
Toyonaga, Takashi
Ikezawa, Nobuaki
Nishio, Mari
Uraoka, Masanao
Yoshihara, Tomoatsu
Sakaguchi, Hiroya
Abe, Hirofumi
Yoshizaki, Tetsuya
Takao, Madoka
Takao, Toshitatsu
Morita, Yoshinori
Yokozaki, Hiroshi
Kodama, Yuzo
Clinical Impact of Different Reconstruction Methods on Remnant Gastric Cancer at the Anastomotic Site after Distal Gastrectomy
title Clinical Impact of Different Reconstruction Methods on Remnant Gastric Cancer at the Anastomotic Site after Distal Gastrectomy
title_full Clinical Impact of Different Reconstruction Methods on Remnant Gastric Cancer at the Anastomotic Site after Distal Gastrectomy
title_fullStr Clinical Impact of Different Reconstruction Methods on Remnant Gastric Cancer at the Anastomotic Site after Distal Gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Impact of Different Reconstruction Methods on Remnant Gastric Cancer at the Anastomotic Site after Distal Gastrectomy
title_short Clinical Impact of Different Reconstruction Methods on Remnant Gastric Cancer at the Anastomotic Site after Distal Gastrectomy
title_sort clinical impact of different reconstruction methods on remnant gastric cancer at the anastomotic site after distal gastrectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34384165
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.084
work_keys_str_mv AT matsumotokei clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT tanakashinwa clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT toyonagatakashi clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT ikezawanobuaki clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT nishiomari clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT uraokamasanao clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT yoshiharatomoatsu clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT sakaguchihiroya clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT abehirofumi clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT yoshizakitetsuya clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT takaomadoka clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT takaotoshitatsu clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT moritayoshinori clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT yokozakihiroshi clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy
AT kodamayuzo clinicalimpactofdifferentreconstructionmethodsonremnantgastriccancerattheanastomoticsiteafterdistalgastrectomy