Cargando…

Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Surgery: Ten Year Analysis in a Tertiary University Center

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Anastomotic leakage after esophageal surgery remains a feared complication. During the last decade, management of this complication changed from surgical revision to a more conservative and endoscopic approach. However, the treatment remains controversial as the indications for cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Sourani, Nader, Miftode, Sorin, Bockhorn, Maximilian, Arlt, Alexander, Meinhardt, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645084
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.099
_version_ 1784648504760598528
author El-Sourani, Nader
Miftode, Sorin
Bockhorn, Maximilian
Arlt, Alexander
Meinhardt, Christian
author_facet El-Sourani, Nader
Miftode, Sorin
Bockhorn, Maximilian
Arlt, Alexander
Meinhardt, Christian
author_sort El-Sourani, Nader
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Anastomotic leakage after esophageal surgery remains a feared complication. During the last decade, management of this complication changed from surgical revision to a more conservative and endoscopic approach. However, the treatment remains controversial as the indications for conservative, endoscopic, and surgical approaches remain non-standardized. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, all patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for underlying malignancy were included in this study. The data of 28 patients diagnosed with anastomotic leak were further analyzed. RESULTS: Among 141 patients who underwent resection, 28 (19.9%) developed an anastomotic leak, eight (28.6%) of whom died. Thirteen patients were treated with endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT), seven patients with self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) four patients with primary surgery, one patient with a hemoclip, and three patients were treated conservatively. EVT achieved closure in 92.3% of the patients with a large defect and no EVT-related complications. SEMS therapy was successful in clinically stable patients with small defect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: EVT can be successfully applied in the treatment of anastomotic leakage in critically ill patients, while SEMS should be limited to clinically stable patients with a small defect size. Surgery is only warranted in patients with sepsis with graft necrosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8831416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88314162022-02-22 Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Surgery: Ten Year Analysis in a Tertiary University Center El-Sourani, Nader Miftode, Sorin Bockhorn, Maximilian Arlt, Alexander Meinhardt, Christian Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Anastomotic leakage after esophageal surgery remains a feared complication. During the last decade, management of this complication changed from surgical revision to a more conservative and endoscopic approach. However, the treatment remains controversial as the indications for conservative, endoscopic, and surgical approaches remain non-standardized. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2020, all patients who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for underlying malignancy were included in this study. The data of 28 patients diagnosed with anastomotic leak were further analyzed. RESULTS: Among 141 patients who underwent resection, 28 (19.9%) developed an anastomotic leak, eight (28.6%) of whom died. Thirteen patients were treated with endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT), seven patients with self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) four patients with primary surgery, one patient with a hemoclip, and three patients were treated conservatively. EVT achieved closure in 92.3% of the patients with a large defect and no EVT-related complications. SEMS therapy was successful in clinically stable patients with small defect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: EVT can be successfully applied in the treatment of anastomotic leakage in critically ill patients, while SEMS should be limited to clinically stable patients with a small defect size. Surgery is only warranted in patients with sepsis with graft necrosis. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-01 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8831416/ /pubmed/34645084 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.099 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
El-Sourani, Nader
Miftode, Sorin
Bockhorn, Maximilian
Arlt, Alexander
Meinhardt, Christian
Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Surgery: Ten Year Analysis in a Tertiary University Center
title Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Surgery: Ten Year Analysis in a Tertiary University Center
title_full Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Surgery: Ten Year Analysis in a Tertiary University Center
title_fullStr Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Surgery: Ten Year Analysis in a Tertiary University Center
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Surgery: Ten Year Analysis in a Tertiary University Center
title_short Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leakage after Esophageal Surgery: Ten Year Analysis in a Tertiary University Center
title_sort endoscopic management of anastomotic leakage after esophageal surgery: ten year analysis in a tertiary university center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645084
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.099
work_keys_str_mv AT elsouraninader endoscopicmanagementofanastomoticleakageafteresophagealsurgerytenyearanalysisinatertiaryuniversitycenter
AT miftodesorin endoscopicmanagementofanastomoticleakageafteresophagealsurgerytenyearanalysisinatertiaryuniversitycenter
AT bockhornmaximilian endoscopicmanagementofanastomoticleakageafteresophagealsurgerytenyearanalysisinatertiaryuniversitycenter
AT arltalexander endoscopicmanagementofanastomoticleakageafteresophagealsurgerytenyearanalysisinatertiaryuniversitycenter
AT meinhardtchristian endoscopicmanagementofanastomoticleakageafteresophagealsurgerytenyearanalysisinatertiaryuniversitycenter